I wrote an ordinary review for the first Forest Lord book, then a shorter rant about the second one. This time, let's try bullet points. Here are some takeaways from Rise of the Wolf:
Positives
- Steven A. McKay is a great storyteller. Even when he made decisions I found frustrating, he knows how to tell an engrossing story that captures the atmosphere of a medieval folk tale. Much like the first two books, there are numerous side quests that draw from Robin Hood's lore while adding a few neat twists to keep readers on their toes. It just goes to show that there are a few self-published gems out there. The storytelling is further strengthened by Nick Ellsworth's excellent audiobook narration.
- I like learning about the backstories of each of the outlaws, and I think spreading them out over the course of the series (ex. Will and Tuck in the first book, Little John in the second, Allan and Matt in the third) was a smart decision.
- The most controversial part of this book was clearly the decision to kill off Allan-a-Dale. Personally, I think this was a brave decision that added some realism and emotional weight to the story. I particularly liked how, after three books of the outlaws constantly complaining about Matt, we learn that Allan actually liked his old comrade, and was hurt by his betrayal. Similarly, I appreciated how the author came up with a creative way to finally off Guy of Gisbourne, making it a team effort between Robin, Matilda, and Marjorie. That said. . .
Negatives
- The Guy of the second book was arguably the best character in the story so far, but he clearly overstayed his welcome. Guy is a much less complex villain in the third book, and he strangely feels less threatening because of it. Nothing he does is any more malevolent than what the outlaws themselves do regularly, save his decision to target Robin's son in his last act, which feels like it was thrown in specifically for the purpose of making Robin and the outlaws look heroic by comparison.
- As with the first two novels, the framing of Robin and his gang as heroes doesn't sit well with me. It would be one thing if we were supposed to see the outlaws as anti-heroes, or as criminals starring in a crime drama, but we're not. We're told over and over again how honorable Robin is and how the good people of Wakefield and beyond view him and his gang as guardian angels, despite them being every bit as violent and amoral as most of the series' designated villains (if not quite as excessively as in the last book). One scene in the previous book that stuck with me (two, technically) involved one of the outlaws brutally murdering a woman who led him on so she could steal from him (remember, this is a story where the heroes are all thieves). You would think this would have had some lasting effect on the character, but no, it's never even mentioned. Instead we're told multiple times how honorable this man is. Throughout the series, McKay has men threaten women with violence as a means of emphasizing their villainy. Yet when one man chooses to act on it, it's brushed under the rug because, hey, he's one of Robin's friends, and she was a lying slut anyway.
- This book comes to a nice, definitive close. Which is why it's so baffling that there's a fourth book after this.
In Between
- The women in this story are . . . okay, I guess. Not the worst I've read, but certainly not the best either.
- Not all of the deaths worked as well as Allan's or Guy's. Osferth's felt unnecessarily cruel, and Gareth's just felt random.