What do you think?
Rate this book


There's no hiding off the grid.
Joe Pickett's old friend Nate Romanowski is off the grid, lying low while the FBI search for him. But they're not the only ones looking. Nate finds himself confronted by agents who need his help assessing a potential terror threat in Wyoming's Red Desert – in return they'll make Nate's criminal record disappear. Nate knows they can't be trusted – but with his liberty at stake, he has to comply... for now.
Meanwhile, Joe's heading south, under orders from State Governor Rulon to investigate a rash of crimes and an uptick in secretive federal activity along Interstate 80...
As they pursue their quarries, both men will be drawn deep into the Red Desert, 9,000 square miles of bleak, punishing terrain, home to a secret that could take them both down.
371 pages, Hardcover
First published March 8, 2016

I love the characters, and pleased to see more of Nate Romanowski, but wtf?
What was even the point of the woo-woo stuff? The book opens with Nate having a prophetic bad dream. It turns out Joe Pickett's wife, MaryBeth has the same dream. It serves no useful purpose to the novel, so why do it?
Box has a bad habit of writing stuff that he thinks sounds good without checking out the science. In a previous Pickett novel, I'd complained about his lack of understanding of the mechanics of white-water rafting, but here it's much worse because the story focuses on Nate Romanowski, a falconer, and he doesn't seem to have researched falconry very well.
At one point, Nate stoops to lecturing, and says his birds are "...falcons. All falcons are hawks, but not all hawks are falcons." I don't know, maybe that's just a colloquial Americanism of the kind that calls Vultures "buzzards", when a buzzard is really a kind of hawk, but the fact is all falcons (and hawks) are raptors. But falcons are not hawks. In at least two places it says one of his birds, a "red tail" is a falcon, but a red-tail is actually a hawk. The sport is known as "falconry", whether the birds are hawks or falcons: but it's also known as "hawking".
In another place, Joe misnames the Grizzly Bear as "Ursus horribilis" and the scientist studying the bears says "We don't use that name..." Now, I suspect that Box might know the proper name for a grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) but that would ruin his dig at scientists who can look at an animal as some sort of free-of-original-sin creation, without ever thinking about their impact on people. As Joe puts it "If you don't say it out loud, it can't mean 'horrible bear.'" But that's not the scientist's point. They don't call it Ursus horribilis because the taxonomists have now decided that all Brown bears across Europe, Asia, and North America are one species—Ursus arctos—and the Grizzly is just one subspecies.
And finally, the whole basis of the book is a plot to destroy an American data center with an EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) weapon. That part would probably work. Actually disabling cars is considered remotely possible—destroying your laptop and cell-phone is pretty much impossible. It turns out that for an EMP to work the electronics need a long antenna. The national electrical grid is one huge antenna, which makes it vulnerable even to solar flares. Your phone doesn't contain enough wiring to work as an antenna for the EMP.
Just very sloppy.