Almost unbearably dispiriting, this sorry tale about a widow, Francesca Bassington, living in what I believe is termed gracious penury, grievously tolerating the unchecked excesses of her feckless, vicious, emotionally careless, selfish son, Comus. Why she should have named him after Milton’s Lord of Misrule, it is hard to imagine, for the boy has certainly arrived at adulthood fully possessed by his name as well as having no regular income, either earned or unearned.
But these faults in mother and son have repercussions, and Saki explores these in this short novel. Francesca is permanently troubled not only by Comus’ behaviour that alienates him from the small world of Society in which they live, but has constantly to be on the lookout for some opportunity, an opening, a sinecure of some kind that might provide the young man with a financially secure future. That secure future is, of course, one she would expect to serve her too. Her insecurity is frequently highlighted by her anxiety about her apartments which were left to her by a friend on the understanding that as soon as that friend’s daughter is married she, Francesca, will have to find herself alternative accommodation. And said daughter, Emmeline Chetrof, is seventeen and ‘passably good-looking’ and therefore likely to be married within five years. It is a pressing problem.
Meanwhile, Comus has lost any chance of making himself eligible as a suitor for Emmeline by beating her young brother at school. When Lancelot Chetrof writes home to his sister and remarks that the prefects on the whole ‘are rather decent,’ but that ‘Some are Beasts. Bassington is a prefect though only a junior one. He is the Limit as Beasts go’, then it is curtains for Francesca’s plans in that area.
Similarly, in spite of his undoubted manly appearance and social charm, Comus ruins his chances with wealthy heiress, Elaine de Frey, from whom he regularly borrows small sums of money and then has the effrontery to insist on gifting himself one of her family’s silver bread-and-butter dishes as a ‘souvenir of a happy tea-party’, intending to have the crest removed and to keep his collar studs in it. It is not long before his rival, young opposition MP, the speechifying Courtenay Youghal, is able to supplant him.
And so on, Saki leading both mother and son to sad, utterly undistinguished ends.
The novel is both fun – when caustically satirical – and not much fun – when considering the irredeemable characteristics of the two protagonists’ lives. This latter aspect is not alleviated by Saki’s according either of them a smidgeon of sympathy. This is not entirely true: Comus is given a pitifully melancholy moment as he contemplates his loneliness, but this is undermined by Saki making it clear the ‘joyous scrambling frolic’ Comus observes is one which his actions have rendered inaccessible to him; and in Francesca’s case, her discovery that her one source of financial assurance is a dud, is offered no consolation. Saki, for me, clearly has abandoned these people as beneath contempt, and, justified as he may make himself felt, his judgment left me feeling as if my sensitivities had been sandpapered and then poulticed with acid drops.
His style, however, is a delight. Taut sentences, packed with the pith and bite I associate with Pope. Nevertheless, I often find Pope so condensed as to require repeated reading before reaching full – or fuller – understanding, and I frequently found myself having to re-read passages of ‘Bassington’. This necessarily impeded the fluency with which I read the novel. But on balance such halting progress was worth it.