One of my pet peeves with series is when an author writes something new that contradicts something written in an earlier book. It perpetually annoyed me with Sookie, until CH was able to get a fact checker, then it improved somewhat. With 2 authors writing together, you would think they would have a better chance at avoiding this mistake. At least put in a disclaimer.
Ok, I picked up Neferet's Curse because I'm already invested in this series, and thought hey, this might actually be more interesting. The problem I have is that this story is COMPLETELY different than what is described in Marked. Handily, I had just decided to reread the entire series before I start Hidden, because I can't remember a lot of what's happened, and wanted to avoid being a little confused like I was with Destined. So, having just read it, here's the passage from page 211 of Marked:
"My mother died when I was ten years old. My father did not remarry. Instead, he began to use me as his wife. From the time I was ten until Nyx saved me by Marking me when I was fifteen, he abused me." Neferet paused and let the shock of what she was saying settle into me before she continued. "So you see, when I say that I understand what it is to have your home become an unbearable place I am not just spouting platitudes."
So here are the contradictions:
1. Neferet was 10 when her mother died. Emily in the book is 15.
2. Neferet is immediately and continually abused from age 10 until 15. Emily is only raped once, her last night as a human. Part of that is because she wisely blocked her bedroom door with a dresser so her father couldn't come in.
3. Neferet was Marked at age 15, Emily is 16.
I get why P.C. Cast wrote the novella this way....as the character of Neferet has developed in this series, I can see how Emily in this book turned into Neferet in the other books. I see the agenda, the seeds of coldness, rationalization of her actions, the conniving act, manipulation, and above all the self reliance and isolation, and putting herself above others. (Let's not forget the obvious reference to the white bull, and her fascination with it). So knowing the developed Neferet, I can see the emergence from the girl Emily into the power-hungry High Priestess.
HOWEVER, the initial bitter declaration in the first book seems to me to be a more complete story....I can only imagine what effect that kind of abuse could have on a child, especially in the 19th century, when there weren't any sort of child protective services. Abuse, long or short, is devastating, but to me, the 6 month period told in NC seems incomplete when compared to the original mention of the story. Of course it would be more difficult to write, given the subject matter, but I just feel this novella could have been done so much better. It feels contrived, even though I believe Cast's heartfelt words in her postscript. I guess what I feel disappointed about is the same thing I'm disappointed about with the entire series now: when they began the books, they didn't have the full deal, and it was supposed to be much shorter. As I've stated in other reviews of this series, I believe that once the authors got on the money train, I feel they've been milking it for all it's worth, and that includes these novellas (which are actually more expensive on sale than I paid for the first few books). It's a shame really, when the series was awesome at first. But now, I just want it to be over so I know how it all ends. Thankfully I only have to wait for 2 more books.