Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “نهاية التاريخ والإنسان الأخير” as Want to Read:
نهاية التاريخ والإنسان الأخير
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

نهاية التاريخ والإنسان الأخير

3.55  ·  Rating details ·  5,176 ratings  ·  379 reviews
Ever since its first publication in 1992, The End of History and the Last Man has provoked controversy and debate. Francis Fukuyama's prescient analysis of religious fundamentalism, politics, scientific progress, ethical codes, and war is as essential for a world fighting fundamentalist terrorists as it was for the end of the Cold War. Now updated with a new afterword, The ...more
Paperback, 356 pages
Published January 1st 1993 by مركز الإنماء القومي (first published 1992)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Popular Answered Questions
Jason Williams It goes roughly in these steps:

1. America is a liberal democracy where a combination of capitalism and "moderately redistributionist" public policy ha…more
It goes roughly in these steps:

1. America is a liberal democracy where a combination of capitalism and "moderately redistributionist" public policy have resolved problems of class and inequality.

2. There is no other and no better ideological paradigm remaining that could challenge liberal democracy. Liberal democracy is the best and there is nothing better to come.

3. America, the paragon and champion of liberal democracy, won the Cold War.

4. History is therefore over. America and all liberal democracies are now post-historical.

5. Anybody still fighting against liberal democracy remains in a state of history. They need to catch up or be caught up by force.

6. "Project for a New American Century" (a now-defunct public policy and foreign policy think tank)(less)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.55  · 
Rating details
 ·  5,176 ratings  ·  379 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of نهاية التاريخ والإنسان الأخير
Feb 15, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I was thinking of reading one of the author’s more recent works, “On the Origins of Political Order” when I saw a comment from him about how that book was in part an attempt to update “The End of History” with what he knows about the world now. As I’d never read “The End of History” I decided to start with that. The book takes the reader back to those optimistic days of the early 90s, when dictators of all stripes seemed to be on the run. I’d be interested to read of the author’s more recent tho ...more
Mar 03, 2010 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Fukuyama has been much ridiculed since the publication of this book, and the piling-on only increased in intensity after the towering cataclysm of September 11th seemed to herald the exact opposite of what Fukuyama allegedly proclaimed. I say allegedly because Fukuyama himself backed away from the logical implications of his own theory long before the final page—in a review of Trust, another Goodreads member accused Fukuyama of incessant hedging, an imputation with which I concur. This is the wa ...more
K.D. Absolutely
Nov 03, 2009 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to K.D. by: 501 Must Read Books
Shelves: 501, history, non-fiction
Intelligently written history book that is included in the 501 Must-Read Books. Published in 1992 and based in the authors earlier essay, The End of History, this book says that since the end of Cold War in 1989, history also ceases because there is no balance of power and so liberal democracy will prevail unopposed. The essay came out of course after 9/11 when the landscape of the world was changed especially because of the economic crisis that followed the attack.

Fukuyama expounds on the earli
Dec 19, 2007 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I normally dont get down with political philosophy books, but this one really explores some serious ideas while putting them in the context of history. Fukuyama bases almost all of his ideology off of Hegel and Kojeve, a modern Hegel scholar from Czech Republic. I love history yet have found Hegel incomprehensible and too dense to even consider buying one of his tomes - for people who are interested in history or the idea of dialectics, read this book. Fukuyama explains Hegel while placing him i ...more
John Morgan
While I certainly disagree with this book's thesis - that the spread of globalist capitalism and liberal democracy to all parts of the world represents the goal and end point of the historical process - it certainly remains the archetypal work for the American political outlook of the 1990s, during the brief, magical period between America's triumph in the Cold War and 9/11. And, of course, this dream of the '90s remains a potent force in many quarters of America today, even if the events of the ...more
“But it is not necessarily the case that liberal democracy is the political system best suited to resolving social conflicts per se. A democracy's ability to peacefully resolve conflicts is greatest when those conflicts arise between socalled "interest groups" that share a larger, pre-existing consensus on the basic values or rules of the game, and when the conflicts are primarily economic in nature. But there are other kinds of non-economic conflicts that are far more intractable, havin
Jan 07, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: economics, history
I first read this book when it came out in 1992, was impressed by it and kept it for a second read that I completed yesterday.

My first impression that this is a very important work has been confirmed, not only did I find my original highlighting justified, I added a bit more. The derision the book has received is not justified and is based on a superficial analysis of the author's idea.

Fukuyama takes as his theme the idea of G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) that history is linear and has arrived at its
Jun 11, 2011 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
we are at the end of history, apparently, with so-called liberal capitalism. marx was right about method, apparently, but not about result. (cf. Spectres of Marx!) ...more
Jul 13, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
Fukuyama posits liberal democracy as a natural endpoint for human societies, because it satisfies the needs of "man as man," the desiring and reasoning parts, but also the desire for "recognition" as a being with dignity and self-esteem. The End of History was a term first coined by Hegel after the victory of the French in the Battle of Jena. It meant not that events would cease to occur, but that the final and most satisfying form of human society had been promulgated. According to the dialecti ...more
Arun Divakar
When I was done with this book, all I had in my head was a faint buzzing. I took it initially to be a sign of incomprehension but later figured it out to be one of weariness. The weariness stemmed from the theories that the author postulates in the book. A quick look at the reviews tells me that I am not the only one with the same ideas. According to Fukuyama, we reach the end of history when we achieve the liberal-capitalist democratic form of government. He is quick to tell us that this does n ...more
Gordan Karlic
Feb 25, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I didn't plan on writing a long review but because of Marko Pustaj, it will be quite long but even then I will only scratch the surface.
I will start with the questions what is liberal democracy? And who was the victor of the Cold war?
Let's answer the second question first. Primarily victor of the Cold war isn't liberal democracy as Fukuyama thought, it is capitalism. Sure countries with liberal democracies lead capitalism toward victory, but during 45 years of Cold often too often did those coun
Ray Hartley
May 12, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Francis Fukuyama must hold the title for Most Misunderstood Intellectual. He is derided for having predicted in this seminal work written after the fall of the Berlin wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union that history had "ended". Of course history didn't end and that was not what Fukuyama was suggesting. He was positing that that there would be no "higher stage of development" which would follow capitalism and liberal democracy. Instead, there would be a continuous refinement and adjustment ...more
Apr 03, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
The only interesting thing about this book is how it was so dominant when it came out, with everybody cheering for the conversion of the former "communist" nations to "democracy", and how irrelevant it is now.

This guy is kind of an asshole, and his sole accomplishment is that we can gauge which way the ideology of hegemony is pointing by the relative popularity of his cheerleading efforts.
Frederik Vandelannoote
Excellent book that explains the American imperialist and capitalist mind. In general i don't agree with this hegelian type of progressive philosophy or do I sympatise with liberalism, but that being said, good insides. ...more
The main thesis of this book is that the combination of free market capitalism and liberal democracy (based on human rights) represents 'the end of history'. To wit, all countries and peoples in the world will eventually attain this supposedly homogeneous state of government, and it will be stable and self-sustaining. The justification for this thesis is based predominantly in philosophy, although also in history. It is interesting to note that far longer is spent on justifying the long-term sus ...more
A Man Called Ove
Is liberal democracy the highest state of evolution of the state/government so far ?
The book argues that liberal democracy is indeed the best form so far and goes further to argue that it is the best form that can ever be achieved. In that sense, it is the "end of history" and the middle-class human being is the "last man".
3-4 years ago, I read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand which makes a great case for uninhibited/unfettered individual (economic) liberty with a "laissez-faire" (minimum) government
Jan 26, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It's easy to ridicule Fukuyama today because we have the power of hindsight on our hands. But given the political climate in which the book was written, it makes ample sense, contextually.
The argument of liberal democracy being the end of history seemed very compelling, but I was very uncomfortable with the idea. The Anglo-Saxon liberalism, on which the modern democracy seems to be based, is incapable of dealing with a human being's intricacies. The introduction of Christianity in the text is al
Gary Inbinder
Second reading: Originally read in 1992

The title refers to an odd fusion of Hegelian/Marxian historicism by way of Alexander Kojeve and Nietzsche. Many readers will interpret this book as triumphalist flag-waving for Liberal Democracy's late 20th century triumph over Soviet Socialism. I don't think that's what Fukuyama intended. Wars of aggression, oppression, poverty, plague, famine, prejudice, intolerance, etc. are here and will be for the foreseeable future. We're very much "in history." If t
Mohammad Aboomar
I am mesmerized by how clear and convincing this book was. Ideas like the directional interpretation of history, the master/slave relationship, the struggle for recognition and thymos were new to me. Now I have to read Hegel, Nietzsche and Koheve to get more into the author's frame of mind.

I agree with Fukuyama about many points, above all his portrayal of liberal democracy as the end of history according the Hegelian approach. My main disagreement with him is that he puts the US and Europe in t
Steve Greenleaf
Feb 26, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
At the Jaipur Literature Festival, I looked forward to hearing a program on “History Strikes Back & the End of Globalism”. It was dialogue between John Ralston Saul & Hubert Vedrine (a former French foreign minister). I hadn’t read either author, although Saul’s Voltaire’s Bastards is packed with my other books back in Iowa City). I wasn’t sure what to expect. The Glamorous Nomad and C joined me. We were in for a surprise.

Saul opened the session by singling out “some guy called Francis Fukuyama
Jun 15, 2018 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: politiek
This book must be one of the books I referred to the most often. But until now, I have not spent any time to read it. Shame on me. And while I am aware of the main thesis, the book was in some way worth reading.

For one, the book is not all about politics, but it discusses philosophy too. Especially Hegel, Rousseau, Kant and Nietzsche (to name a few) are dealt with in detail.

Based on Hegel's historicism, Fukuyama builds a political theory that eventually liberal democracy will prevail. At the tim
Aug 22, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: cold-war, philosophy
Composition: 2/5
Evidence: 2/5
Writing Style: 3/5
Balance: 1/5

This is the book-length project from the author who received widespread attention for proclaiming the end of history with the fall of the Soviet Union. The original quotation made it sound like an exuberant shout, celebrating the victory of Western liberal democracy over Soviet-style communism. It sounded like a comparative politics project or perhaps a comparative ideologies analysis. The context of that quote, published in the 1989 sum
Kristian D'Amato
Though ultimately equivocal and therefore flawed in its bold claim that liberal democracy is the final stage of ideological evolution, this book gives a compelling analysis of thymos, the desire for recognition. Thymos has nearly vanished from most accounts of human motivation, eclipsed by its two worldly companions: material desire and rationality, but The End of History lands it back where it belongs and proves (imho) that no purely utilitarian theory of the social contract can be quite as con ...more
Feb 18, 2021 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
my life was better before i read this
Tariq Fadel
Nov 23, 2020 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I found this an incredibly thought provoking and profound book on political sciences. The objective of the author is to convince you that the entire history of humanity and all the stages that it went through will culminate in the world becoming a McWorld. That is every country in the world will eventually be liberal, democratic and capitalist. And while I'm not sold, I must confess that the author displayed a respectable amount of cautious skepticism in his prophecy.
The first counterargument I
Michael Gerald
I read this book as part of my graduate class in Political Science.

This book started as an essay in the magazine The National Interest in 1989. The feedback it got led to it being expanded to a full book in 1992. Thus, the book was written in the euphoria over the collapse of communism in Europe.

In this book, Fukuyama (a former Assistant Secretary of State) suggests that there are two driving forces of history: the logic of modern science and the struggle for recognition. The combination of the
Gregg Wingo
Mar 19, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Fukuyama's seminal work is many things to many people. It is about government, oppression, laws, justice, warfare, economics, etc. But fundamentally it is about pride and vanity in the individual human. The work is focused most about the "desire for recognition" in all of us. Whether it be our simple primate social behavior or the lust of capital accumulation or intellectual acknowledgement or sexual prowess - every member of humankind desires recognition within their community and culture.

Navid Asmari Saadabad
A collection of strong premises and notable historical facts followed by inaccurate conclusions.
Starting with Alexander Kojéve’s interpretation of Hegel and the concept of human consciousness, Fukuyama, asserts that desire, reason, and thymos (desire for recognition) are the main ingredients that constitute a human, each of which must be satisfied in the society.
He claims that the rapid progress in modern science and technology has provided the means for satisfying desire, while leaving the man
Alex Lee
I've heard so much about this book, that I had to finally read it.

It's not what I thought it would be. I thought there would be more economics. But instead of approaching the political situation through economics, it appears Fukuyama went deeper into the psyche. Additionally, not only did he use Nietzsche as a frame for his book, he also used Hegel to do it with! So this is a strange book. It's a hodgepodge of different ideas, extended maximally for their consequences, and then used as a frame t
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
  • Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis
  • Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics
  • Theory of International Politics
  • The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
  • Politics Among Nations
  • World Order
  • Orientalism
  • The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities
  • Arms and Influence
  • Diplomacy
  • The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
  • Island of the Blue Foxes: Disaster and Triumph on the World's Greatest Scientific Expedition
  • The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad
  • The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848
  • The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations
  • Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield
  • The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy
See similar books…
Yoshihiro Francis Fukuyama (born 27 October 1952) is an American philosopher, political economist, and author.

Francis Fukuyama was born in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago. His father, Yoshio Fukuyama, a second-generation Japanese-American, was trained as a minister in the Congregational Church and received a doctorate in sociology from the University of Chicago. His mother, Toshiko Kawata Fu

News & Interviews

Care to travel to past times for some serious drama? Check out this season's biggest historical fiction novels and be transported to tales of...
83 likes · 21 comments
“It was the slave's continuing desire for recognition that was the motor which propelled history forward, not the idle complacency and unchanging self-identity of the master” 33 likes
“For Hegel, freedom was not just a psychological phenomenon, but the essence of what was distinctively human. In this sense, freedom and nature are diametrically opposed. Freedom does not mean the freedom to live in nature or according to nature; rather, freedom begins only where nature ends. Human freedom emerges only when man is able to transcend his natural, animal existence, and to create a new self for himself. The emblematic starting point for this process of self-creation is the struggle to the death for pure prestige.” 9 likes
More quotes…