When booksellers and bookmen get around to writing their book about books, I have come to find, they often fail to trust their materials – books. Rather than books, bookmen (to use the old fashioned, sexist term) feel compelled to tell us about famous people they’ve met, engage in literary criticism, or persist in telling us about themselves at tedious length. And “Sixpence House” is another example of the failure of the genre. “Sixpence House” is not the worst book-on-books book I’ve read, but it is a missed opportunity. And I am sorry to say this because its author, Paul Collins is my kind of guy when it comes to books – rather than being attracted to rare first editions and pristine dust jackets, he is drawn to the obscure, the forgotten, and the bargain. He is straightforward in his interest in the dusty corners of book collecting, and he quotes from his finds – wonderful lost bits of literary and quasi-literary and just weird disjecta membra that can be found in ancient periodicals and utterly forgotten volumes. But like I said, he doesn’t trust his material. Books co-star (at most) in “Sixpence House,” sharing space several other things I care very little about, in descending order: English food, English real estate transactions, the author’s short story collection, the author’s toddler son’s endless toddling and funny noises, the author’s wife’s jigsaw puzzles and interior decorating ideas, the author’s (and his wife’s lockstep) political-environmental views and snarky cultural-social commentary.
The tale is this: Collins, his wife and toddler, sell their place in San Francisco and move to Hay-on-Wye, a hamlet on the English-Welsh border that has become a “book town” – more than forty used book stores. I thought the book would be an account of setting up shop there and their adventures in the book trade. Not so. They move there with vague plans to do exactly this, they look over some houses to buy (a process described in a great deal of detail, which wasn’t bad, but not really of interest to me), can’t find one, and so move back to Oregon or someplace where it rains a lot. The Sixpence House of the title is one of the properties they look at and don’t purchase. I’m not entirely sure what they planned to do to make a living – “write” seems to be the plan. During their stay, the author visits some bookstores, pubs, and real estate offices, all of which we are told about.
This book is such a disappointment about half the time. The author’s toddler stories interested me about as much as cute baby stories told by people I don’t know usually interest me, which is to say not at all (so let me tell you about my cats…). The socio-political commentary is not only NPR ideal market segment predictable, it is often by turns arrogant and nasty. I cringed at the little at his high-toned description about how he and his wife don’t drive or own cars and how this demonstrates their overall goodness and virtue and how this is only possible in a few choice USA cities, while the rest of us bake the planet in our SUVs. “Back in America, I sometimes wondered whether my wife and I were the only people in the country without cars, without licenses even; she’s never had one, and I neglected to renew mine years ago. When People would tell us that something was nearby, Jennifer and I would look at each other and silently think, yes, it’s nearby, for car people….” A little of this goes a long way with me. The problem with this coming from this sort of guy is the remarkable fact that the car-less often seem to need to hitch rides in other people’s cars and, even worse in a carbon-footprint sort of way, it seems they are criss-crossing the globe in jets all the time (Collins mentions he has been to England a multitude of times). Even their little oops!-changed-my-mind trip to Hay was, finally, just a rather extravagant waste of resources by a couple of Westerners trying, vaguely, to “find” themselves. Other moments of cultural commentary – both English and ‘mericun – too often veer from the sharply-observed to the supercilious and even nasty. By the end of the book I was making my own nasty observation – just where exactly do the Collins’ family get their money? Nobody seems to work except the author, for a couple weeks at one of the local bookstores. They sold their place in San Francisco, which no doubt brought in a lot, but where did that place come from? SF has about the highest real estate prices in the country – I know one person who lives there and she has a trust fund. Collins mentions an advance for his short story collection, but I find it impossible to believe a first-time short story collection advance amounts to very much. I suspected a trust fund, which doesn’t matter at all, except when the trust fund kid keeps poking fun at the peasants toiling in the fields (and closing their shops and pubs at hours inconvenient to him) around him.
However, despite myself, I did mildly enjoy Collins’ observations on English people and ways of life. The bizarre food -- I laughed out loud when he reports spotted someone purchasing a tin of “Mr. Brain’s Pork Faggots in a Rich West Country Sauce” (p.192) -- the absurd utilities, the medieval real estate transactions all add up to a young-man-abroad kind of travelogue of a fairly predictable sort. Collins tends towards the merciless when describing other people, and although this keeps him from finding Mr. Chips on every pub stool, it comes off rather harsh and unsympathetic finally. Perhaps the most compelling character in the story, the eccentric, energetic, competitive, anarchic, disorganized and stroke-ravaged Richard Booth, who created the Hay-on-Wye used book phenomenon and lives in a disintegrating, fire-ravaged castle looming over the town. Booth hires Collins as his “American expert” for his bookstore and although Collins gives a dispassionate, unsentimental portrait of this strange man, Booth comes off more of a crank and bad businessman than fascinating eccentric.
But back to the books. As with his more general cultural observations, when it comes to books Collins reveals a snobbishness that can be quite harsh – he describes contemporary dust jackets and how they are designed to appeal to certain types of readers. This goes from pages 111-113 and it is meant to be funny, I think, but it comes off just mean. The terms “uneducated readers” and “crap” are used. But he generally handles books more delicately than this. In fact Collins is, like I say, my kind of bookman (I mean this as a compliment, I think). While he loves the old, weird, neglected stuff, he does not wallow in Love of Books rhetoric that so often ruins books about books – no rhapsodies on glorious smells and the crinkly ivory pages and whatnot. And no bragging about pristine F. Scott Fitzgerald dust jackets, thank God. In fact he does a great job with the grubbiness and even filth that attends any pile of books, whether in a neglected shop or your own shelves (or floor). His selections from his reading are witty and interesting, but too few and far between. His ruminations on the fact most authors wind up utterly forgotten, persisting only in used book shops and the bottom of boxes in estate sales is well done, melancholy, and true. His asides are promising:
“Look at all these dead shelves. For every book you recognize there are twenty that you don’t. Usually this heartens me – what an adventure to read those twenty! But no I just feel kind of blue about it. Even writing and publishing a bad book, a boring and stupid book, takes gargantuan effort. And for what?” (p. 123)
In a couple of places Collins describes dispassionately the fact that the booksellers of Hay will burn books – lots of them, in bonfires. The charred pages will even drift across town sometimes (to his credit, Collins does not make a Holocaust comparison). One dealer even tried to figure out a way to sell old books as fuel for wood-burning stoves (the packing and rendering was too expensive to be practicable). Collins’ lack of sentimentality on this point was bracing and admirable (I so, so, so wanted to like this book more than I did). The typical booklover’s book would make knee-jerk Nazi comparisons and generally weep and wail about these books consigned to the flames. But the fact is, a lot of books are simply unsellable; in fact you cannot give them away. The books come into Hay from the USA by the shipping container load, and as ramshackle, unprofitable, and chaotic as they often are, used book dealers are in business. There is simply nowhere to store six copies of Frommer’s Guide to Italy, 1982. Two hundred years from now they will be rare, but now who would want them? (and even if one person does, the other five copies will go a’begging, taking up shelf space for the rest of the proprietor’s natural life span, unless he does something about them).
I completely agree with Collins’ take on the best-managed, best-organized bookstore in Hay (I ran a few paragraphs together here – Collins’s has a weakness for single-sentence paragraphs that are meant to be dramatic):
“The Cinema Bookshop is better run than Booths’s: the hundreds of thousands of books here are priced and categorized, and related subjects are in proximity to each other. A proper modern cash register is at the front of the store, and a magneto-whatever exit gate will shriek if you try to steal their stuff…Yet I have never bought a book in the Cinema Bookshop. Not one. The titles themselves are curiously inert. Booth’s, in its wide-armed embrace of everything that avalanches upon it, has become a de facto library of the forgotten, with both everything you could want and everything that nobody could ever want. But the Cinema Bookshop is a used-book store run as if it were a new-book store; all the books are correctly priced, and there are no shocking bargains here. There is no surer way than that to suck the fun out of book hunting.” (pp. 106-107)
As good as this is, I do wish he had described Booth’s in a contrastingly positive way. He prefers Booth’s squalor, but it seems to be a grudging preference. Mostly, when describing Booths he complains about the squalor and filth, or the way the employees fail to appreciate his efforts to tidy up when he is employed there.
But dammit, there is good stuff in this book. Compellingly, Collins fleetingly addresses the loathing – and even self-loathing even – that comes from an immersion in old books, a topic that keenly interests me. Yes, I “love” books – but I also hate them as well. Why is this? My own dusty piles sometimes bring me great satisfaction, and yet I hate them sometimes too, or they fill me with melancholy. Sometimes nothing is more conflicting for an aspiring, probably already failed, versifier than to contemplate a folio volume of Abraham Cowley’s poems, sixth edition, published in 1684. As a book person, I love the antiquity of it, the crooked type and long-s’s and the archaic spelling (and the fact I lucked into it on eBay and only paid $40). But there is something desolate and futile about all those lines of Cowley’s execrable verse. For about a hundred years it was a given that Cowley was better than Milton (thus the availability of Cowley’s folio works). Then came the long, slow slide. Such reputations! Such oblivion! As for the death of reading culture, Collins says early in the book:
“You see, literary culture is perpetually dead and dying; and when some respected writer discovers and loudly proclaims the finality of this fact, it is a forensic marker of their own decomposition. It means that they have artistically expired within the last ten years, and that they will corporeally expire within the next twenty.” (p. 3)
Yes! And yet throughout “Sixpence House” we are treated to Collins’ worrying and fretting about the final stages of getting his collection of short stories published, which he describes in worried, fretting young author ways. There’s nary a whisper about the likely endurance of any first story collection, or his own slim volume’s chances of winding up on a remainder table, or being chucked into the flames of some desperate used bookseller’s inventory-reducing bonfire forty years from now (if used bookstores still exist then). Collins’ obtuseness about his own literary activities gives the book a blinkered, even selfish cast. His fresh-out-of-the-workshop writing advice he shares doesn’t help the situation (real writers (like Collins) don’t wait for inspiration but instead work really, really hard, you know).
As compelling as parts of the book can be, Collins doesn’t really develop them (often returning to cute baby stories instead). This gives the book an air of superficiality and sketchiness, a feeling of lost opportunity. Perhaps in thirty years he can re-write the book and give it some heft. The kid will be grown up by then, Collins will own a house and he can stick to the books.