Management of Organizational Behavior is a classic example of reconciliation and synthesis. It makes a valiant attempt at combining and aligning many different types of behavioral, social, psychological and leadership theories. One cannot help wondering how much the data was massaged to make it fit the sythesized model. However, most of the theories mentioned are well established and respected, so they should not be ignored. Discovering your own leadership style strengths, or how to negotiate leadership styles with subordinates have highly developed systems, and the book describes them, but using the tools requires further steps. Those steps involve understanding and being able to apply all styles of leadership to all styles of worker behavior. The adaptive mechanism is asserted rather than explained.
On the whole, the theory makes a great deal of sense. When a person is behaving a certain way, if I lead them in a corresponding way I should see good results. Insecurity requires detailed direction. High competence and willingness means I can delegate. The workers in a work environment should respond well to such individualized treatment.
It is a rather complete package, though the book begins, after awhile, seeming like it is merely introductory. The authors have available a number of evaluative and diagnostic tools as part of a larger package which the book merely describes.
This is a book best digested slowly. If the reader ascribes to the method, then there are detailed theories and skills to be absorbed and can only be absorbed with practice. The authors ascribe openly and apologetically to a behavioristic theory of human interaction. We do not act according to what our leaders think but according to what they do. What they say will stimulate certain behavior. As a leader learns to identify certain organizational dynamics, he must learn the appropriate approaches to implement effective leadership. This cannot happen quickly. The model is so complex as to require the memorization, application, and developing competency in a number of high level functions of reasoning and inter-personal dynamics. It would be easy to see an organization using this model finding it difficult to reproduce in the management structure, since it would require so much work for managers to learn and even learning it would not guarantee competence. No room is given in the book for the idea that a person may have difficulty balancing the complextiy of the process, or that all people actually can do it, even if they knew how.