This book summed up in two words: Plain Ridiculous.
I'm either grouchy, or just in the wrong mood, or Turano's books just don't work for me anymore, or -or...something because I was sure I would love this book and started it with the full expectation of falling madly in love with it.
After all, I read and thoroughly enjoyed all four books of the Ladies of Distinction series, and this one wasn't THAT different in tones and writing, but somehow it crossed the thin line Turano often walks between Plainly Diverting and Plainly Ridiculous. One certainly does not read her books for historical accuracy, and suspension of disbelief is an absolute must when reading her, but I thought that After a Fashion simply carried things too far.
What Exasperated Me Beyond Belief
:
* So the historical accuracy thing. This book is set in New York in 1882. Now, I know, this is Jen Turano; people talk with no filter, ladies dress up as men and walk into brothels, end up in jail, carry pistols like parasols, wear big hats with dangling birds, set fire to the tables at the restaurant, and always try to look inconspicuous with outrageous disguises. Her books aim to be diverting, not accurate, I get that. And to some extent, I can appreciate it, when well done.
The problem in After a Fashion was that the historical inaccuracies were not just matters of improbable situations, but more so matters of incorrect principles and ways of thinking.
- As a supremely wealthy, highly eligible darling of New York high society, there is absolutely no way that Mr. Oliver Addleshaw would randomly ask a hat girl to pose as his companion (gentlemen do not have companions) with the purpose to parade her about town and gain favour with a duke, with whom Oliver hopes to conclude a business deal. Everyone agrees that the plan is mad, but it's just not something that would have been thought of at all in 1882.
- Moreover, when pressed by his best friend to see reason, Oliver declares that no one, no one, could possibly think that by continuously appearing in public on the arm of Miss-Hat-Girl, he'd have any romantic interest in her. This is 1882 after all, not the Dark Ages! Of course going about everywhere with the same woman will not arouse gossip and suspicion, OF COURSE NOT, WHY THIS IS NOT THE VICTORIAN ERA OR ANYTHING, WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!
- The mingling of the various social classes simply did not work in this book, not at all. I don't remember any problems with that in the previous books, but I think it's because all of the heroes and heroines were of the same social classes. But here, I can't even begin to list all that doesn't work. Suspension of disbelief HIGHLY, HIGHLY INDISPENSABLE.
- Mrs. Hart, one of the wealthiest, most influential matrons of high society, would not decide to take three working, nearly homeless young ladies under her wing and her roof on a whim. And she would not ask them to call her by her given name immediately.
-Neither would Oliver's grandfather - who waltzes in out of the blue, and proves to be another extremely-wealthy-and-influential-member-of-the-elite-who-does-not-care-that-his-grandson-has-allied-himself-with-a-working-girl-and-asks-said-working-girl-to-call-him-by-his-Christian-name. IT DOESN'T WORK, KAY!
So, in other words, until Oliver and Harriet actually enter into a fake engagement, the premise of this story does not work, and I felt like I was wasting my time.
* Oliver and Harriet, for the most part of this book, are absolutely insupportable whenever they have a scene together - which surprisingly, isn't all that often, considering how quickly they fall in love. Oliver, frankly, just didn't appeal to me all that much. He didn't have that something special that really made me root for him as a hero. He was a little bland, to be honest.
Harriet was just constantly running away from Oliver; jumping from carriages, dashing down alleyways, running into clothing stores, hiding under tables, the list goes on. I liked her as a person, but whenever she was around Oliver she seemed to lose all her brain cells save the ones who had command of her legs (because she was always running away).
*THE FIRST SCENE WITH MISS BIRMINGHAM AND THE DOG??!?!?!!?!? WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT??!?!?! I honestly considered DNFing this book right then and there. I found absolutely nothing humourous in that completely, COMPLETELY impossibly impossible, supremely irritating scene.
*Which brings me to the general humour of this book. I've read several reviews that mention how funny this book is. Having read other works by Turano, I know how witty she can be, and how hilarious some of her scenes are. In After a Fashion however, while the dialogue is mostly good, most situations were too stupid and improbable to be funny, and too litered with annoying characters to be diverting. I rolled my eyes 90% of the time, and only chuckled for the remaining 10%. Not good.
*I'm also not a dog person, and there was too much dog for me. Buford did not amuse me in the least, and I just found him very superfluous in the book.
*Oliver, for a gentleman constantly described as "fit", "muscled", "well-formed", with a "trim waist" - was remarkably out of shape. What, pray tell, does he do to exercise and keep those muscles well muscled, if he's always sitting down doing business work, and running after Harriet in the street and carrying a dog up the stairs cause him to break into a sweat as though he'd just ran a marathon? Every time he did anything remotely physical, he was out of breath remarkably quickly. Mmmm.
*HOW would he not notice if his jacket is SO ill-fitted that it's missing all its buttons but one?! And if he's usually immaculately dressed in super well-fitting suits, how does he not notice his tailor plays a trick on him and lets him go with a horribly fitting jacket? I believe this was trying to be funny, but it just didn't make sense.
*Harriet, for a lady supposedly endowed with a keen sense of fashion, has absolutely no idea what's up, and is always wearing outdated (albeit original) gowns.
*The main villain of this story really, REALLY lacked motivation and her background story was not convincing IN THE SLIGHTEST. This author is capable of much better.
*The book is literally littered with annoying characters. Like, there is an absolute plethora of them. #why
So yes, anyways, as you can see I had a few problems with this book. I really wanted to love it and I tried my best to just ignore all the pesky little details that bothered me and just have fun with it, but it was just a tad too much. HOWEVER. There WERE many little things about this book that I did enjoy.
What Saved This Book From Earning a 1-Star Rating and An Even More Scathing Review
:
*THE MAJOR TWIST AT THE END. ASHJFKAHSJKDJKA I WAS NOT PREPARED FOR ALL THE ADORBS. I just absolutely did NOT see it coming (and it’s not even that surprising or out there or anything, I just wasn’t thinking), but it was so perfect and it made me so happy!!
*I love the fairytale aspect of the story. Poor hat girl gets embroiled with rich businessman…happily-ever-afters and knights on white horses and flowers and sunsets. YAS.
*I really did like Millie and Lucetta, and since the next two books in this series will be about them, well, there is hope.
*I loved that Harriet was a milliner and wanted to open a dress shop (and I loved her idea for a retractable bustle!), but I wanted more fashion details.
*The dialogue, I must say, is pretty good. Witty and funny as always, and Millie was absolutely priceless with her big words and her dictionary.
So it wasn’t ALL bad, I did enjoy myself a little, and although it’s one of those stories that won’t really stay with me, it was still a fun ride and the ending really delighted me and made up for the first 90% of mixed feelings and too much eye-rolling. 😉 I am looking forward to In Good Company, but I really hope it’ll be a bit less ridiculous and hopefully I’ll be in the right mood for it when I pick it up.