"I’m telling you that I have complicated feelings about men, and you are telling me it’s misandry.”
Well ... Yes.
The first time I heard the word "misandrist" was probably circa-2013 on my tumblr dashboard. Littered among gifs of galaxy prints and pastel goth edits of quotes from Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's We Should All Be Feminists (someone who would later go on to be accused of TERF rhetoric, but we'll circle back on that), I found out that there was a word meant to be an inverse of misogyny. It was kind of used as a joke, the subtext being the understanding that it bore none of the systemic bite that misogyny had. None of the 18 year old girls with "misandrist" proudly displayed in their bio possessed any real power to influence the government, the workplace, the home. Most of them hadn't even earned a high school diploma. And yet they felt the bind of womanhood already - a set of expectations, of restrictions passed down from all of the women who had come before them. Women caged by the patriarchal structures that limited their ambition, confined them to the home and childrearing, that institutionalized them for acting out and wanting more than their husbands and fathers saw them fit to achieve. To put it lightly, women have historically had the short end of the stick. Our rage is perfectly valid, and you don't need to have experienced much of the world to feel the weight of history on your shoulders (just ask any of those teenage girls with an internet connection in the early 2010s).
However, at what point does this ambiguous rage rooted in structural oppression stop being useful? At what point does it stop serving us in the pursuit of knowledge, reform, and community and the wound begin to fester? Anne Marie Tendler answers that question quite simply - her self-righteous rage toward men has no purpose at all. It seeks no resolution; it encourages no connection to the women around her. It forcefully propels herself inward on an endless loop, the carousel of indignant rage falsely directed at her romantic partners as she seeks retribution for a lack of identity and self esteem that began and proliferated from within. In this memoir, AMT points the finger at every male figure in her life in place of confronting her own violent insecurity and never seems to scratch the root cause of her own self-imposed misery. It's an arduous schlep through the psyche of a 37 year old woman who moonlights as an artist but can't seem to find anything to hold her attention for more than a year or two, resigning her to survive on the bank accounts of the rich and famous men she attracts. And no, you don't even get to hear about the one she famously divorced, securing her this book deal in the first place.
The book is framed as a trip through Tendler's breakdown and admission to a psychiatric hospital in early 2021, and in all fairness, she was certainly in need of help. With a history of disordered eating, severe anxiety, depressive episodes, and self harm, she was a woman in crisis. At her facility, she meets four women whom she grows close with over the week. In a better version of this book, we spend more time getting to know them and their stories. Being around these women recovering from addiction and mental illness of their own certainly brings out the best in Tendler. They're arguably the only grounding forces in her life, as they force her outside her own head and disrupt her self-absorbed inner monologue for brief periods of time. When we are trapped in Tendler's head, it becomes very clear how much of a competition she wants to make her mental illness. Not only does she share her exact emaciated weight when she enters the facility, something that if you've ever stepped foot into disordered eating spaces you KNOW not to do, but she also makes a point to share that her marks of self harm were so severe, she managed to shock the unflappable nurse. Needless to say, I would not recommend sharing this book with anyone currently struggling with mental illness of their own. There is no discretion in the way she describes some of her self harming behaviors, which can be dangerous when shared with people currently in a crisis of their own.
The problem with the hospitalization framework, and arguably the memoir as a whole, is the John Mulaney-shaped hole in the book. As mentioned, Tendler never once overtly references her marriage to the comedian or his alleged infidelity that lead to their very public divorce over the pandemic. It could be argued, and is my personal opinion, that this was a deliberate choice to serve as a "fuck you" to the onlookers prying into a very personal, distressing time in her life. And to be clear, I agree that the invasion of privacy from the tabloids and self-proclaimed social media sleuths was both cruel and likely contributed to her declining mental state that landed her in an institution in the first place. However, to write this entire 300+ page memoir with the overarching structure of autopsying every man who has ever hurt you which eventually lead to your week-long stay in inpatient care WITHOUT mentioning the Husband Of It All? It's disingenuous at best and only draws more deliberate attention to the omission. Writing a memoir as an expression of empowerment after a painful relationship is a logical move to not only secure your own financial future after surviving off the income of a spouse for almost a decade, but also as a symbol of independence. So why then, taking all of this into consideration, does Tendler choose to frame her entire life story - in her own words - around the opinion of the men in her life?
Simply put, Tendler’s only tether in life is the validation of men. She craves male attention to a pathological point and resents them for both giving and taking it away. It has to be a difficult life to lead without an internal compass. She can’t hold down a job, her family offers her no support, and she feels increasingly alienated by her friends for choosing their own life paths. She is stuck frozen in stasis as every other person moves on around her, but it’s the men she blames for her strife. Not just her ex-husband, as she doesn’t mention him, but every man she has ever had a fleeting relationship with. To be almost 40 years old, ruminating about a boy kissing you as a teenager and never calling you back, reflects a deep emotional immaturity that makes fleeting teenage romance as important as an 8 year marriage. It’s outrageously foul for a man in his late 20s to be dating a 17 year old, but in Tendler’s own words, it was consensual at the time and he was away on tour for most of the year she “lived” with him in LA. In another draft of this book, maybe Tendler dissects these power imbalances with nuance - how your perceptions of equity shifts as you age, the concept of consent and how things you “consented to” as a child may not have been healthy choices in retrospect, how your priorities in a relationship change as you get older. Instead, because Tendler’s worldview hinges with borderline TERF-y gender essentialism in a death grip, all of these relationships are the same to her. She is a victim in every relationship she has ever had with a man and he is the aggressor on equal standing. To her, a relationship with a generous but stupid millionaire in her mid 20s is the same as a boy on the cross country team with whom a flame fizzled out. Her life is flattened into one plane of existence, Tendler Vs. The Patriarchy.
This worldview, framing men as the source of her pain while still using her desirability in their eyes as the litmus test for her worth as a human being, ultimately feels like an unreckoned-with form of self harm. She can quit cutting and starving herself, but how many mediocre men will she churn through before she’s able to be alone with her own thoughts at night? How long can you claim that “dating” is a form of healing because you’re only bedridden from heartbreak for two days instead of a week before you realize your lack of self worth is keeping you swiping, looking for the next man 8 years your junior who will tell you how young you look for your age, how slim you are, how fuckable he finds you? Who would you be if you never had sex again? Would you be able to live with yourself if no one thought you were pretty? Who are you in the dark when there’s nothing left but the sound of your own heart beating? Who are you? Tendler doesn’t know. She just knows that men have called her crazy, and she must exist in defiance of that. Unfortunately, creating a sense of identity that is only in opposition instead of in desire is a deeply vacuous way to live that will leave you searching for something to fill the hole it creates. Until Tendler is able to give up men as a whole for at least a period of time, it is my opinion that she will continue on this path of anger and resentment until it eats her alive. I think waiting on this memoir for another decade before she sat down to write may have been wise, at least to help give her life a better narrative. As it exists now, it’s empty and lifeless, maybe half a book at best.
There’s a distinct sense of omission with regards to analyzing her female relationships at all in this book, most of all the one she shares with her mother. Their relationship growing up, as described through various vignettes, is tenuous at best. Her mother is an adversarial figure in her life, someone with an explosive temper that gave up her own opportunities in the fashion industry to become a stay at home mom. Even as an adult when Tendler, after her mother has “become a different person” after an extended Yoga retreat in India, describes their interactions in a terse and standoffish way. There’s clearly a deep chasm between the two of them, Tendler’s implosive sadness the mirror to her mother’s explosive anger. I can empathize deeply with this situation, I’ve lived through it a thousand times over in my relationship with my own mother. But Tendler is highly defensive of her mother when any of the male physicians attempt to dig into her childhood. She completely shuts down any inclination that her mother could be less than a perfect caregiver, while her mom complains in the present about having to watch her dog Petunia while Tendler spends the week in inpatient care. Her psychologist directly indicates some form of repressed anger toward maternal figures in her discharge paperwork, and Tendler dismisses it entirely as the physician’s inclination toward the sarcastic refrain “let’s blame women”. After spending 300+ pages in her head, it seems like a sharp possibility that she is simply replicating the same freeze and fawn behaviors that got her through a difficult childhood far into adulthood, but this possibility conflicts with her worldview. Viewing everything through the lens of gender essentialism allows her own conflicted relationships with women to fly under the radar because she is so consumed with her anger toward men. It makes me question the quality of her care if she is approaching 40 and still unable to reckon with any shred of nuance in her worldview.
Where do we leave Tendler? Where does she go from here? I guess she’s into photography again and enjoying being “the highest-grossing artist in the history of the fair” she frequently works with. Whether that has anything to do with her own artistic merits or the fame she inadvertently acquired by being the subject of her ex-hubsand’s benign standup routine for the better part of the decade, we’ll never really know. The reality is that she is an amalgamation of all of these things, whether she likes it or not. I am, too. We all are created on our own terms and the terms of those who have loved us, some fleetingly, some painfully. This is a memoir written from the pain of someone fearing they’ll amount to nothing and being nothing more than the sum of the men who have hurt her. And as harsh as I’ve been throughout this review, I DO believe she can be more than that, if she chooses to put in the work. That’s a big “if”, she’s got a long way to go. And so I say from the kindest corner of my heart: Anna Marie Tendler, please go get a real fucking job.