Morgan is My Name is a feminist retelling of the Arthurian legend, told from the perspective of Morgan Le Fay.
I've always been fascinated by Arthurian legend, and as such was interested to see what this new take could bring to the table. The book is I believe the first part of an intended trilogy, and I did perhaps find this first part to be rather drawn out at times. Still I am interested to see where the author goes with the series, as this first book seemed very much a set up for events to come.
Morgan Le Fay of legend is an intriguing character, often morally ambiguous, and Keetch does a decent job I thought of her Morgan's character journey thus far. She is spirited and rebellious from the off, intelligent, with a thirst for knowledge and often feeling trapped within this man's world she lives in. She is also subject to tragedy from an early age, losing her beloved father and having to suffer at the hands of her cruel stepfather, Uther Pendragon. Through the course of the book we see her try to pursue her passion for knowledge and her innate gift for healing, only to be denied to follow this path by the men that dictate her life, be it Uther, or later her husband. We follow her as she makes enduring friendships, falls in love, and knows betrayal and loss. Through it all her spirit never breaks, and by the end of the story one can begin to see the sorceress of legend take shape.
I enjoyed the various nods to Arthurian legend, and there were characters and aspects here that were new to me, such as Accolon of Gaul and Urien. Though only featuring in the story for small parts, I thought the character of Niniane particularly intriguing. Queen Igraine was a particularly sympathetic character, and Alys another favourite, her friendship with Morgan a highlight.
The novel features romance, hints of magic and political intrigue, but more than anything it is the story of a woman's journey and growth. There are various settings within the story, but I think my favourite was Tintagel Castle, and the wild and mystical atmosphere of the Cornish coast.
The book is not without its criticism. Whilst I appreciated the strong female characters, I did find the depiction of most of the men rather one-dimensional in their villainy, as if they were merely tools for Morgan's own character arc, without any nuances of their own. In this way, I found the book rather simplistic, and would have preferred more shades of grey. I'm not sure how the story will progress, but I would personally hope that as Morgan becomes more of a villainess, there is more culpability given to her own decisions and choices, as opposed to all the blame being laid on the men around her. I want her to have flaws, and feel the author needs to be a little braver and bolder in her depiction.
Of the men, I did think that Accolon and Arthur were at least given some qualities and likability, and whilst Morgan feels betrayed by Accolon, I personally could appreciate his perspective. Arthur, we do not yet see too much of, and going forwards, I would be particularly interested in his character development. I will say that I was disappointed in Merlin's depiction. It is not that I mind him being portrayed as untrustworthy, but that I just didn't find this rendition of him in any way compelling.
I did also find the book rather slow-paced and a bit repetitive at times.
Overall, as a fan of Arthurian legend, there were aspects here that I enjoyed, and I am interested to see where the story goes. However, thus far I don't think the true potential has been achieved, and would say this pales in comparison to another Arthurian retelling that I have read in recent years, Lancelot by Giles Kristian. 3.5 stars