What do you think?
Rate this book


297 pages, Paperback
First published July 29, 2003
come to my blog!1. The author’s insistence on calling the children’s stepmother “The Stepmother.” Less irritating was occasionally calling Magda, “The Witch.” Was the idea here that people couldn’t figure out that it was a retelling of Hansel and Gretel (despite calling those characters “Hansel” and “Gretel” the whole time) unless core characters retained their simple descriptions instead of names?
2. The way the story uses mental illness to retain some semblance of an antagonism between the witch and the children. Especially since it goes nowhere. The claim that the witch tried to kill them would be interesting if it resulted in a consequence for any of the characters. As it is, whatever the children believe about the witch is irrelevant because THERE ARE PSYCHO NAZIS and all plots are derailed when they show up.
3. The elements of the Grimm fairytale seem pasted onto another story. The breadcrumbs here are pointless. Arguably, the oven episode has no point except to put flares on the idea that the Nazi ovens were crematoriums.
4. The title and its implication that starving children in the woods are less true when they’re starving from being poor rather than from being Jews, escaping from Nazis.
5. There’s no meta awareness of the Hansel and Gretel story. This one is much more subjective than the last four, and the story could have worked without it but it seemed like it should have been there since their names came when “their Stepmother shook loose an old memory.”