Oh my god, guys, I finished it. This thing. This collection of...I have no idea how many stories. 600ish pages doesn't sound like a lot, but in this case, it has been experience. I'd like to thank my cat, for crawling on top of me while I was trying to concentrate. I'd like to thank my insomnia, for giving a few sleepless nights to get a few more in. I'd like to thank Joe Hill, Phil Rickman, Reggie Oliver, and all the other authors that I read when taking a break. Love to my mom, etc etc etc
Now that that is out of the way, let's talk about how to review this book. There would be, as is true of all collections of short stories no matter the number of authors or years contained within, two broad strokes that can be applied: heterogenic vs monolithic. In the former, there is the general idea that the collection is just that, a basket of fruit and individual fruits may be eaten and the rest left, so that any review in general can only generally talk about the goodness and badness of this or that apple, with maybe some comment on the basket-preparer's general sense of what goes where. Except, to someone thinking of buying this book, hearing that there are "some good stories" and "some poor stories" does not quite fulfill their question. On the other hand, the monolithic approach does not treat the subject as itself. No one is required to eat all the fruit in the basket, and the fruit comes from wholly different seasons. If the middle third of the fruit is too sour for eating, it does not mean that the basket as a whole is a lesser thing, maybe just of lesser overall value. The usual response to a reviewer like me is to try both, give a run down of stories good and bad, and then to sum up feeling as a whole, but that feels wrong, here, so I will try a different tack.
If you were to take the 54 stories here (I went and looked it up after starting the review), my guess would put 27 or so of them as unnecessary. In that 27, you have repetition from better stories - another middle-aged bachelor sees something after playing bridge and finds his friend's new house has an odd past that will be vanquished in the last few paragraphs without proper resolution - and even, in a few cases, truly poor stories without even Benson's generally charming writing to make it feel worthwhile. The other half, the 27 kept, range from the spectacular to the wonderfully mediocre. Benson, as a writer, feels like he builds off of a toolkit. He has a box of spook story creation, and largely uses the same pieces:
* A middle-aged, middle-class man (who is broadly Benson himself, though not always a perfect fit) becomes entangled with someone else's horror story.
* A discussion of the nature of haunting, time, spiritualism, evil, and/or fear will develop at some point between characters, often at the beginning or at least by the middle, which will explain the nature of the horror being faced.
* There will be a vacation, a trip, or some new real-estate bought to set up the story.
* Smoking cigarettes, playing bridge, playing golf, and just walking about (and, to a lesser degree, fishing, hunting, or other outdoor pursuits) will be mentioned. [I would have to go back and count, but I would wager that characters smoke cigarettes in something like 95% of these stories, and play bridge in around 80%.]
* There is often some sort of malaise upon a character: a change in life is needed, a tiredness, a need to escape for a short time.
* The ghost will generally just be seen as a person, sometimes with a limp, mostly at a distance, and will largely be unterrible except that the text makes sure to tell you the character is terrified by the very thing.
* There are often non-specific hints at a certain wickedness at play, people who live sinful lives without a definition of their sin [it a few places, it makes you wonder if Benson is playing at his own homosexuality].
* The final resolution is generally short and incomplete, and not in a good way, mostly in a "darkness cannot overcome light so why did it ever bother" kind of way.
* There might be a coda that just wraps everything up in a quick explanation, and more than once (much more than once, even), it starts with something like "You might remember the murder trial at X" and then just tells you what the ghost was.
And here is the rule of Benson stories, the great law I found: the further he deviates from this path, the better his stories often are. Those 27 or so I discarded so rapidly to start, those probably ticked just about every point off on the list. The kept stories play with them to lesser or greater degrees. This is where the meat of the collection is, a man who knew ghost stories, who knew spiritualism, and was willing to play in the toolbox from time to time (when, I suspect, he wasn't merely trying to make money from publishing safe tales to press).
There you have stories like "Caterpillars", where strange, fleshly caterpillars with pincer feet crawl about a house at night and infect their victims with cancer. Here you have "The Face", where a loving wife/mother is haunted by a future vision of her own death and is driven to it by chance. You have the more playful "Spinach" and "Psychical Mallards" and "Mr. Tilly's Seance", where he takes friendly potshots at spiritualists and makes humorous and likeable protagonists. There is "The Man Who Went Too Far" and "The Thing in the Hall" (which is a broadly weaker story, overall) where a proto-Lovecraftian character pushes too far into the realm of knowledge and is punished for it. You have the sluglike elemental that punishes sinners in "Negotium Perambulens" (and a similar one that haunts the woods in "And no bird sings..."). You have the wicked man haunted by his own sins, eventually realized in a faceless but fleshy spectre, in "The Step". The Satanic cult of "The Sanctuary". The slightly saucy ghost of "Thursday Evenings". The experiment upon dead brains in "And the Dead Spake--". The Machen-esque survival of the "Horror Horn". The famous future haunting of "The Bus-Conductor". There is a hint of folk-horror in "The Temple". There is the moral incertitude of "The Hanging of Alfred Wadham". Even in the depths of his toolbox, the melodramatic "How Fear Left the Long Gallery" has heart.
Those stories, and more, are a tribute to the genre. There are others, such as "The Room in the Tower" and "Mrs. Amsworth" that play at the line between ghost and vampire that are well loved (but while the former is interesting in its imagery, the latter is mostly about a lovely woman being evil, something Benson plays around with a bit too much overall). Benson plays at future hauntings, at occasional moral ambiguity, at horror hitting upon somewhat normal folks (if country estates and lots of leisure time is "normal"). His stories have elements that show a foot firmly in the past and the future of the genre. It is phenomenal. BUT, if you read this collection from page 1 to page 600+, you are going to find those stories at best every-other-story and sometimes with several milder or poorer tales in-between. In this way, I think a better curated collection of maybe 15 or so stories would be a much more potent way to learn Benson. Or, use this review as a way to get something of a map of stories to start with, and then bounce around a few of the more "typical" tales like "The Tale of an Empty-House" that are fair in their own right.