Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture” as Want to Read:
The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture

3.88  ·  Rating details ·  169 ratings  ·  15 reviews
"A startling argument . . . provocative . . . absorbing." --The Boston Globe

"Ambitious . . . arresting . . . celebrates the importance of hands to our lives today as well as to the history of our species."
--The New York Times Book Review

The human hand is a miracle of biomechanics, one of the most remarkable adaptations in the history of evolution. The hands of a concert
...more
Paperback, 416 pages
Published September 14th 1999 by Vintage (first published 1998)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Hand, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Hand

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.88  · 
Rating details
 ·  169 ratings  ·  15 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture
Nick
Apr 19, 2009 rated it it was ok
A disappointment. The book promised to talk about the connection between the hand and the brain, and to reveal the hand' role in making us the brainy creatures we are today. But there is very little of neurology in here, and lots of "gee, isn't the hand an amazing bit of bioengineering!" As well as stories of people who can do remarkable things with their hands, like play the piano and juggle. OK, that's cool -- though it would be even cooler if we were talking both at once -- but not cool ...more
John
Feb 19, 2015 rated it liked it
Two and a half stars. This was very promising at the beginning: the story of how the evolution of the human hand led the development of the human brain. The first 4 chapters or so deliver on this promise, and are utterly fascinating. But then the book degrades into a collection of musings on human nature. I think the blame lies with the editor... this should have been a shorter and tighter book. I recommend the first half.
Zechy
Sep 30, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: science
The subject is fascinating, the author is a bit of a twit.
Megan
Jan 24, 2018 rated it it was ok
Shelves: 2018, anthropology
I liked the beginning chapters on the whole and their focus on anthropology, evolution of primate anatomy, and linguistics – particularly sign language (p.200) and apraxia (p. 205). I enjoyed Anat’s story about practicing Feldenkrais therapy (p. 247-57), but felt disappoint that Wilson’s point to telling her story was to demonstrate, “how the hands can bring an individual not into a distinctive kind of work but into transforming relationships with people and ideas” (256) –uninspired.

There was
...more
Gary McCallister
Boring, opinionated, dry, and one-sided. Like a lot of science.
Clayton Grames
Feb 05, 2020 rated it liked it
A very interesting premise with a fascinating main thesis but the book strays into tangents that can be hard to connect to anything meaningful. The first half was the most worth the time.
Soren Kerk
Sep 17, 2017 rated it it was amazing
You could not ask for more if you want to learn about the hand - and the brain.

My favorite lesson was about polypod and polylith creations. Proud to be a homo sapiens.
Jonathan Powers
Jul 17, 2014 rated it it was amazing
While _The Hand_ is far from being a perfect book, it never ceases to fascinate. Perhaps one third of the chapters are given over to an impressively compelling argument that the development of the human hand was the proximate stimulus for the development of the human brain. We could climb and throw and catch and manipulate before we could think or reason (in the most technical sense). Another third of the chapters discuss some the quite astonishingly varied feats of which the hand is ...more
Jim Omlid
Jan 02, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: educators, educational policy makers, parents
Recommended to Jim by: Nate Jones
The author builds a strong case for the value of incorporating hands in the learning process. He documents how the human hand evolved uniquely (the ulnar opposition) to give us special tool-making and tool-using skills; these skills gave us the ability to kill prey that added protein to our diet fueling our brain growth at a rate far beyond the brain growth of our chimpanzee cousins. We became human because of our new capacity to grasp, shape and point tools and weapons; no other creature has ...more
Kristi
Jun 16, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: nonfiction-other
This book was so interesting. I didn't actually read much of it, only a few chapters and then it was due back at the library. I would like to pick it up again sometime. It was a little more techincal than I thought it would be and I wasn't completely sure I was understanding things correctly all the time, but it was interesting read.
Jillymom
Jul 17, 2012 rated it it was amazing
I have actually read this book all the way through! (Without understanding quite all of it.) Fascinating and worth while, in so many different directions. Just finished my paper on the hand, thank goodness.
Lindsay Evermore
Nov 19, 2010 marked it as to-read
milford orange stratford
Lilly Irani
I'm expecting this book to give me lots of scientific and athropological fodder for phenomenological theories of cognition like the kinds that Dourish and Winograd / Flores summarize.
Kim
Apr 07, 2015 rated it it was amazing
Fascinating look at the relationship between the hand, the brain, language, and human beings, including specific implications for learning and education.
Lynette
Dec 24, 2008 rated it liked it
Fascinating study of influences on the brain by actions of the hand. Good especially for pianists!
Leah
rated it it was amazing
Jul 26, 2008
Paul Derricott
rated it it was amazing
Apr 15, 2012
Thomas Riccio
rated it really liked it
Aug 06, 2015
Liz
rated it liked it
May 27, 2015
Omar Castro
rated it it was amazing
Feb 14, 2019
Luke
rated it it was amazing
Jul 11, 2016
Ellen Hendriksen
rated it liked it
Sep 20, 2017
Laurenellen McCann
rated it it was amazing
Oct 20, 2010
Min Min
rated it it was amazing
Dec 14, 2017
Ross Laird
rated it it was amazing
Mar 27, 2016
Rory McGuinness
rated it did not like it
Feb 17, 2016
Erin
rated it liked it
Jan 23, 2009
Alexandra
rated it liked it
Sep 14, 2012
Dean
rated it liked it
Jan 21, 2008
Stuart Card
rated it really liked it
May 16, 2017
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Leonardo da Vinci
  • The 4-Hour Body: An Uncommon Guide to Rapid Fat-Loss, Incredible Sex, and Becoming Superhuman
  • Annapurna
  • The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
  • The Winter Palace: A Novel of Catherine the Great (Catherine, #1)
  • The Nazi Officer's Wife: How One Jewish Woman Survived the Holocaust
  • Rule of the Bone
  • The Family that Couldn't Sleep
  • Continental Drift
  • Snoop: What Your Stuff Says About You
  • Peter & Max
  • The Way to Rainy Mountain
  • The Lost Choice: A Legend of Personal Discovery
  • Song of Solomon
  • Essex County
  • Before I Wake
  • Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn't Want You to Know
  • The Year of the Flood
See similar books…
“Buttressing this argument (that you can prevent children from learning to read or ride bicycles but you can’t stop them from learning to talk), Chomsky had pointed to two other universals in human language: that its emergence in children follows a very precise timetable of development, no matter where they live or which particular language is the first they learn; and that language itself has an innate structure. Chomsky has recently reminded audiences that the origins of the structure of language—how semantics and syntax interact—remain as “arcane” as do its behavioral and neurologic roots. Chomsky himself finds nothing in classical Darwinism to account for human language.* And for that reason, says Plotkin, linguistics is left with a major theoretical dilemma. If human language is a heritable trait but one that represents a complete discontinuity from animal communicative behavior, where did it come from?” 0 likes
“It is probably not a joke that computer games, spectator sports, television violence fantasies, and weekend hunting and fishing expeditions are the necessary transformations of outmoded but undiminished vestigial drives and skills that humans still carry with them. But is the creation of a menu of imaginative diversions our only recourse to the unremitting sway of an obsolete “hunter-gatherer” heritage?” 0 likes
More quotes…