Rating: 5+ / 5
I remember the first time I read this, back when I was a teenager, I thought that it was brilliant. I was so glad that I had taken a psychology course in high school enough to understand it, because from the get-go I was hooked on all its aspects.
That being said, one thing I remember thinking was that the art wasn't really top tier, at least not for what I was used to from shoujo mangas at the time. I saw it as an off-putting element, but thought that the author was contributing what artistic talents he could, and just went with it. When it comes to art vs. storytelling, I'll take storytelling nine times out of ten.
Ahem, but anyway, it's a great and brilliant read--by far my favourite manga out of anything.
I know that some people complain about Nao, the main character, and how gullible she is, but...well, that's the point, isn't it? And while I do acknowledge that it's rather unrealistic for anyone to be that honest to the point of being stupid, I'm not so sure. Since this is a psychological read and all, let me do a bit of profiling on her: she's honest because she's been educated to be so, and chances are that she's led a very sheltered life. She's an only child, so she wouldn't have learned about deception from those closest to her--perhaps a brother or sister would have learned about the lessons of life just as she did, and therefore she would've experienced lying earlier, for example. She seems a quiet, shy type of person, so chances are that she would've have gone partying or really gone out into the world a lot, either. Her main problems were at home with her father battling cancer, so likely she would've have had much opportunity for clubs or even part-time jobs that would put her in an environment wherein lying is normal.
In other words, she is an innocent in the world; and while I can acknowledge that such people are rare, especially nowadays, that doesn't mean that they don't or can't exist. You have to take Nao just as she is, much like you have to acknowledge Akiyama for being a psychological genius, despite being so young and just basing his observations from his university education. I mean, I don't really see people questioning him being able to do what he did so young and so thoroughly, and yet the point is that he DID.
As for the plot itself, I really like how it starts off as one of the simpler psychological tasks/challenges, and that it greets its readers fairly, even those who have only a passing knowledge or perhaps no knowledge at all of psychology. The examples that are used to explain everything just make all the logic super clear, to the point that I remember checking back to the explanations (with their hypothetical examples) over and over again when I first read this as a teen. I see no reason why I won't be doing so again and again.
So, all in all, both in my review for this volume (and more to come, to be sure), and for this series, I cannot recommend it enough!