It’s easy enough these days to pick out those among us consumed with puritanical fanaticism: “The Puritan’s idea of hell is a place where everyone has to mind his own business,” as Harold Frederic writes in The Damnation of Theron Ware. What’s harder sometimes – and perhaps it’s as difficult in our day as it was in Frederic’s – is to pick out the mentally flabby, the spiritually corrupt. Frederic’s 1896 novel tracks the progress downward – or upward, depending on your point of view (the British edition’s title was Illumination) – of a young Methodist minister whose faith crumbles on first contact with intellectualism, Bohemianism, Darwinism, and the more tawdry aspects of organized religious life.
Theron Ware and his wife are assigned to a backwater Methodist congregation in upstate New York, though they had hoped for something more glamorous. The rigorist trustees of their new church (two of whom own mortgages on the church property) don’t appreciate his reputed oratorical gifts or the flowers the young Mrs. Ware likes to wear in her Sunday bonnets. They certainly don’t want any subtlety or soft-mindedness from their new minister. As trustee Brother Pierce puts it to Theron:
“They tell me there’s some parts where hell’s treated as played-out – where our ministers don’t like to talk much about it because people don’t want to hear about it. Such preachers ought to be put out. They ain’t Methodists at all. What we want here, sir, is straight-out, flat-footed hell – the burnin’ lake o’ fire and brimstone. Pour it into ‘em, hot and strong. We can’t have too much of it. Work in them awful deathbeds of Voltaire an’ Tom Paine, with the Devil right there in the room, reachin’ for ‘em, an’ they yellin’ for fright – that’s what fills the anxious seat an’ brings in souls hand over fist!”
Theron surprises himself by making friends with Fr Forbes, an alarmingly liberal but dedicated Catholic priest serving the town’s burgeoning Irish population, and through him is swept off his feet by other new acquaintances more worldly than he’s used to: Dr Ledsmar, the town atheist who loans Theron books by Renan and the German philosophers; and Celia Madden, an over-educated, attractive young woman who introduces Theron to art and music and a moral laxity he finds intoxicating.
Attempting to enter the ranks of scholars in his own right, Theron sets out to write an investigation into the ancient Chaldaeans (from whom patriarchal Abraham sprang) but his former heroes of the Old Testament now limp pitifully across the page:
“Heretofore a poetic light had shone about them, where indeed they had not glowed in a light of sanctification. Now, by some chance, this light was gone, and he saw them instead as untutored and unwashed barbarians, filled with animal lusts and ferocities, struggling by violence and foul chicanery to secure a foothold in a country which did not belong to them – all rude tramps and robbers of the uncivilized plain.”
At the same time his own church finds itself in a dire financial predicament and he’s forced to bring in Brother and Sister Soulsby, a husband and wife team of itinerant “debt raiser” revivalist preachers, whose theatrical performances fill the pews (and the coffers) but whose savvy worldliness disillusions him further. Theron plays sick at the parsonage while they wind up the congregation next door, until Sister Soulsby (who ought by rights to be a classic character of American fiction) comes to cheer him up and help him see the bigger picture:
“Did you ever see a play? – in a theater, I mean. I supposed not. But you’ll understand when I say that the performance looks one way from where the audience sits, and quite a different way when you are behind the scenes. There you see that the trees and houses are cloth, and the moon is tissue paper, and the flying fairy is a middle-aged woman strung up on a rope. That don’t prove that the play, out in front, isn’t beautiful and affecting, and all that. It only shows that everything in this world is produced by machinery – by organization. The trouble is that you’ve been let in on the stage, behind the scenes, so to speak, and you’re so green – if you’ll pardon me – that you want to sit down and cry because the trees are cloth, and the moon is a lantern.
Under such tutelage, Theron somehow revives, but only outwardly, and temporarily. His preaching, everyone says, was never better; but he doesn’t believe a word of it. Half-initiated into a free-thinking fraternity the outlines of which he only vaguely intuits, he begins to feel like a new Adam:
“Evidently there was an intellectual world, a world of culture and grace, of lofty thoughts and the inspiring communion of real knowledge, where creeds were not of importance, and where man asked one another, not ‘Is your soul saved?’ but ‘Is your mind well furnished?’ Theron had the sensation of having been invited to become a citizen of this world. The thought so dazzled him that his impulses were dragging him forward to take the new oath of allegiance before he had had time to reflect upon what it was he was abandoning.”
Is The Damnation of Theron Ware, as some have said, an overlooked masterpiece of American literature? It may be. I stumbled on it serendipitously at the bookshop. I’d never heard of it – or its author – before, though I have a degree in English Lit and have been a reader all my life. But it is a near perfect performance of a novel, an outrageous satire, and great fun to read. It’s a novel, in my opinion, to launch a thousand term papers, if the themes it trades in still have any purchase in contemporary American society, which is questionable.
Part of its success, I think, is wrapped up in the ambiguity of the author’s own judgments and the equivocal nature of the story’s conclusion. It’s not quite – though partly – a burlesque of Evangelical revivalism; not quite – though partly – a sendup of American nativism; not quite – though partly – an indictment of what passes for enlightenment in secular culture. In The Damnation of Theron Ware Harold Frederic is an equal-opportunity tipper of sacred cows.
Anticipating what arguably became the self-demolishing motive force of mainline Protestantism and its secular inheritors in the United States, Theron near the end of the book says to Fr Forbes: “It seems to me that as things are going, it doesn’t look much as if the America of the future will trouble itself about any kind of a church. The march of science must very soon produce a universal scepticism. It is the nature of human progress. What all intelligent men recognize today, the masses must surely come to see in time.”
Fr Forbes responds with a laugh: “My dear Mr. Ware, of all our fictions there is none so utterly baseless and empty as this idea of human progress.”