Review Title: Fiction or journalism?
In the second half of his short brilliant career Dickens returned to the short sketch style that made his first fame in the literary world as "Boz". The 37 pieces here were written in three separate periods—1860, 1863, 1868/69—when his personal and professional life had radically changed, and when his pace of writing longer fiction serially had slowed down. The results are good, if uneven, but always recognizably Dickens.
By 1860 Dickens was separated from wife Catharine and his affair with Ellen Ternan was in full swing. He had become a restless and almost obsessive traveler, trying to find a place to settle his mind or at least mask his guilty conscience. He would soon have the idea of the readings from his books which combined that frantic travel with his drive to earn increasing amounts of money to fund his and his large extended family's profligate habits. So here he writes in the guise of the "uncommercial" traveler, who works for no one but the firm of "Human Interest Brothers, " in contrast to the growing community of business travelers (salesmen, professionals, and upper middle class business men) who rode the expanding rail network from place to place.
Published originally in his monthly serial journals before being collected, the pieces are aimed straight at the heart of his target audience: travelogues of London, poignant humor highlighting the plight of the poor, pointed humor driving at the heartlessness of the government. Most pieces are a blend of all three. Editor Daniel Tyler provides footnotes for topical and literary references, and also documents the (mostly very minor) textual differences between the pieces as originally published and as later collected for book publication.
By 1868/69, when the last pieces were written, Dickens's time and energy were consumed by the reading tours that killed him just a year after the last of the pieces was published. I found these last few some of the least successful in the collection. Especially cloying is number XXXII, "A Small Star in the East," when during a ramble through a very poor section of East London he describes knocking on doors of random poor people's flats and writing about their straitened conditions. Yes, he was the famous Charles Dickens, known for his sympathy for and with the working poor, and would have likely been known by them. But at this point of his life one days earnings from his many profitable ventures could have sustained one of these needy families for a year. And he doesn't name names, but surely there was an underlying tension between being visited by the famous Inimitible, and the humiliation of being an exemplar of grinding poverty.
But by this stage in his career Dickens had so refined his craft that he could (seemingly effortlessly, although if you read his letters you learn the toll such effort took on his mental and physical health) turn his keen eye for observation of people, places, and dialogue into a seamless blend of journalism, essay, fiction, and poetic description. Which makes me wonder if he really did so brazenly invite himself in to these poor hovels, or was this an example of the fertile writer at work? Is this journalism or fiction, a question without a verifiable answer, which makes it unquestionably art, and Inimitibly Dickens.