I picked up this book because a friend was reading it for class, and I was procrastinating. I did not give it a careful read. I read enough of it to know what I thought. The problem is that there is a cult around Bob Dylan that I have never been a part of. Don’t get me wrong. I like his music. But I like most music, but I only know the lyrics to his most popular songs (Mr. Tambourine Man, The times they are a changin', you get the idea...) I think in terms of books on Bob Dylan, this is among the best I have seen. I TA’d a class on the 1960s – and saw a fair number of student papers on Dylan, so I know how autobiographical and lyric focused many books are. This book tries instead to put Dylan in his cultural milieu. It tells the story of political transformation in the 1960s, as much as it tells the story of Bob Dylan. Indeed, the question fueling the book seems to be Dylan’s own political transformation. Apparently the narrative about Dylan is that he started out political, and then got less political as he got popular. This book argues that he became disillusioned with traditional definitions of the political, and saw him self increasingly an outsider interested in his own artistic expression. Yet this desire to remove oneself from society and express one’s creativity is echoed in the increasing politicization of the counter-culture, and even in movements like Black nationalism, where cultural expression becomes explicitly and implicitly political, and where the boundaries of traditional political action are challenged. I like how much the book said about the context that Dylan moved in. I like how much the book said about singers I am more familiar with (Phil Ochs, Bruce Springsteen). If you like Bob Dylan, you’ll like this book. If you are ignorant about music like me, you still might like this book. But if you aren’t looking for a book about Dylan or the 1960s cultural changes, this book probably isn’t for you.