Does your organization manage complexity by making things more complicated? If so, you are not alone.
According to The Boston Consulting Group’s fascinating Complexity Index, business complexity has increased sixfold during the past sixty years. And, all the while, organizational complicatedness—that is, the number of structures, processes, committees, decision-making forums, and systems—has increased by a whopping factor of thirty-five. In their attempt to respond to the increasingly complex performance requirements they face, company leaders have created an organizational labyrinth that makes it more and more difficult to improve productivity and to pursue innovation. It also disengages and demotivates the workforce.
Clearly it’s time for leaders to stop trying to manage complexity with their traditional tools and instead better leverage employees' intelligence. This book shows you how and explains the implications for designing and leading organizations.
The way to manage complexity, the authors argue, is neither with the hard solutions of another era nor with the soft solutions—such as team building and feel-good “people initiatives”—that often follow in their wake. Based on social sciences (notably economics, game theory, and organizational sociology) and The Boston Consulting Group’s work with more than five hundred companies in more than forty countries and in various industries, authors Yves Morieux and Peter Tollman recommend six simple rules to manage complexity without getting complicated.
Showing why the rules work and how to put them into practice, Morieux and Tollman give managers a much-needed tool to reinvigorate people in the face of seemingly endless complexity. Included are detailed examples from companies that have achieved a multiplicative effect on performance by using them.
It’s time to manage complexity better. Employ these six simple rules to foster autonomy and cooperation and to effectively handle business complexity. As a result, you will improve productivity, innovate more, reengage your workforce, and seize opportunities to create competitive advantage.
Language is needlessly complicated adding to the 'complicatedness' of the book (you'll need to endure the book to understand the word).
The stories, that support the arguments, are ranging from nice to artificially stitched to support whatever idea the authors had.
It's more six cases of the authors experience than a complete, comprehensive model of six rules. Each of the stories had some lead catch phrase, that were coined into six rules.
They try to be controversial by stating that the old ways (hard approach - structures, kpis and soft approach - culture, motivation) are obsolete, but at the same time, they use the old ways as solutions to the problems presented. Granted they take some clever (read consulting) word mincing to prove they bring something original, but no, at the end it's just restructuring, broader targets, performance improvement targets and kpis.
I read this book in a week. I guess the last document I read on BCG was the "matrix" they created several years ago. This time -given the huge expertise they have worldwide - BCG makes everything more simple (not easier) splitting -and fixing-all the managerial aspects of the company into 2 pillars: (1) hard [structure, metrics]and (2) soft [feelings, traits]. However, they say this pillars are obsolete and something needs to be done to create impact and increase employees engagement. That being said, BCG thinks the best way to tackle this issue is by following 6 steps that make complexity go away. - Understand what others do. - Reinforce integrators - Increase total amount of power - Extend the shadow of the future (I loved this one) - Increase reciprocity - Reward those who cooperate (blame is not for failure, it is for failure to help or ask for help). Useful book. Completely worth it and immersive. Yves Morieux also has a TED talk in which he explains all of this.
The basic ideas are good and very useful. It will certainly make me rethink some of the things I was doing and it.
But I found it hard to read it as I felt the language was mostly artificial. For example "They can do so by framing rich objectives and then embedding feedback loops that retain the benefits of specialization while ensuring a synergistic interplay" - sorry, I understand what you mean but you don't have to phrase it like this.
This is the best management theory book I’ve ever read. Bright and explained in such a simple way (as the tittle says: “without getting complicated”)!. I recommend to listen to the author’s TED speech, too. Excellent!.
Much like an osteopath, Yves Morieux details the many blockers organizations generate over time and the simple ways to get rid of them. Excellent read, even more relevant today to stay nimble and go far together.
Organisations struggle to adapt the way they work to the changing (business) environment and therefore lose 'competiveness'. How can we fight this 'decay' within the organisation? Their are literally thousands of books that tackle this topic in one way or another, so what makes this book stand out? The authors define the problem in terms of an ever increasing external complexity that leads to internal complicatedness. The book has resonated with me, because I have witnessed the same symptoms the authors describe too many times myself. But it is one thing to describe the symptoms, it is quit another to come up with a simple framework of rules that should help you tackle this challenge. I personnaly feel the authors have done a very good job of getting to six of the main levers that can help you understand why the organisation is functioning as it is. There is always a logic to the madness. Only when you have well understood the organisational challenge, you can come up with a good solution. That solution should be built together with the stakeholders, supporting collaboration and driving towards the goals of the organisation. There are some minor issues I have with the book, but overall this is a thoughtfull analysis of the problems organisations face in real life and practical cases where the authors demonstrate the application of the six simple rules. Highly recommended.
Very thought-provoking. Nice case studies to illustrate key points/concepts. I kept finding myself recommending it to friends and colleagues. I had long gaps between reading stints, so probably need to re-read (already).
Good, to the point, book on managing compelxity in management work. Not that comprehensive as I expected, it provides good and working solutions in the form of six simple rules: 1. Understand What Your People Do (not what is written on their business cards or in ToRs) 2. Reinforce Integrators 3. Increase the Total Quantity of Power 4. Increase Reciprocity 5. Extend the Shadow of Future (this one was really good) 6. Reward Those Who Cooperate
P.S. I am not completely sure how I got this book, as it was a number of references to it.
This book could have been easily written as an HBR article. The contents dont display enough merit to publish it into a book.
The examples shared to support the hypothesis behind the six rather naive rules sound rather artificial and the solutions developed by the consultants not very inspiring.
I dont understand how the authors developed a rule based on a single example.
Finally, i have to give it to some really bad editing. The language is quite twisted and seems like a simple concept is being stretched to forcefit onto what authors have already concluded to be the approach.
Companies have only gotten more complex since the 1950s. Frequently large organizations just layer on more management and procedures instead of empowering those at the problem with enough authority to fix the problem.
Why I started this book: Quick audio and an easy way to cross off another book from my professional reading list.
Why I finished it: Same reason as above. Very easy to listen to and forget. The key thing that I remember just hours after finishing it is that employees are perfectly adaptable and will adapt to management's actions by positive and negative.
Mainly focussed around co-operation and how to structure organisations and roles to encourage co-operation, with the intent that this will allow solutions you otherwise couldn’t find. Some areas were thought provoking but the overall idea that you should talk to your staff and encourage them to co-operate felt a little simplistic.
According to BCG, in 1955, companies typically committed to between 4 and 7 performance imperatives ; today they commit to between 25 and 40.
6 simple rules : 1. understand what your people do : 1 analyze the work context : goals resources and constraints 2 understand how organizational structures, processes, and systems affect the work context Avoid being led astray by the hard and soft approaches 2. reinforce integrators Find operational units that can play the role of integrators. Among your integrators, remove those who cannot add value, and help the efficient one by removing processes and rules 3. increase total quantity of power Power is the ability to make difference on one issue. When you take decisions, see if you create power that you give to a part of the organization 4. Increase reciprocity The success of one depends on the successes of others. The way to create that reciprocity is by setting rich objectives and reinforcing them by eliminating monopolies, reducing resources and creating new networks of interaction. 5. extend the shadow of the future 4 ways to extend the shadow of the future : tighten the feedback loop, bring the endpoint forward - by shortening the duration of projects, tie futures together, make people walk in the shoes they make for others 6. reward those who cooperate « When another unit causes you to be late, you are going to be the one that takes the blame » Jorgen vig knudstorp, CEO of the Lego group : « blame is not for failure, it is for failing to help or ask for help »
Conclusion : 1. Use pain points to discover interdependencies and cooperation needs 2. Discover obstacles to cooperation 3. Capture the benefits
A very relevant book which should be read by all existing and aspiring managers. It would be particularly useful, if read by top management, which so often remains set in the old ways, which the book appeals to abandon in the modern world, fraught with complexity. “Old ways” in the book encompass both hard, and soft, methods of management. The former based on structures, procedures, detailed fixed processes, KPIs, complex reporting lines, precise job descriptions, the latter - on motivational speeches, company off-sites, annual appraisal pep talks. In the authors’ opinion, easily shared by the reader, these methods fail to deliver former value in the modern, fast-changing, and multi-dimensional, world. The six simple rules should to a large extent replace these old methods. So far, so good...
The issue with the book is that, without it being read, and absorbed, by top managers of companies, the six simple rules seem unlikely to end up ruling the world of business, as the principles described can only permeate downwards. The top managers, however, will not allocate time to a book which explains “simple rules” in 200 pages. The book contains many repetitions. For a reasonably bright person, and it has to be assumed that CEOs fit in this category, a concept does not need to be described in fine detail, and repeated three times again, in order to be understood. It is for this reason why the book was not accorded a full 5* rating.
I'm still processing how to apply all of the ideas in this book to my work context... But while reading it, I've already come up with ways to improve what I do, and how to help others promote autonomy and cooperation in their departments as well.
It should be obvious that cooperation is the key to success in business, but for those of you that still don't get it, take the time to read this book. All businesses are people business, and business outcomes are based on the work that those people do, how well they do it, and how they work with others.
This book brilliantly explains how to transform your business to deal with modern complexity without complicating things.
The actual rules reflected are really good. The book is not the most enjoyable to read though. When I've read something similar in the past, I'm left wondering what the authors priorities were. Was imparting the knowledge to help others make improvements at the top of the list or was it to sound very, very smart? It's kind of a shame. As a librarian, I do love a big vocabulary, although...well, I don't want to beat the proverbial dead horse.
The smart simplicity model makes absolute sense in the current over complicated and distracted world today. The six rules contain practical methods to make a shift into this way of working eminently achievable. I thoroughly recommend this book.
Moim zdaniem szkoda czasu na tę książkę. Jest to typowy konsultingowy BS. Poszczególne "zasady" nie wynikają z systematycznych badań z obszaru zarządzania, a raczej są zbiorem rad, które zagrały w różnych przypadkach, z którymi autor miał styczność. Warto sięgnąć po pozycje mające bardziej systematyczne podejście.
Creo que es muy útil para quienes trabajamos en multinacionales ya que da una visión diferente de cómo organizarse para mejorar los resultados apartándose tanto de las teorías más de corte “hard “organizativo puro y duro como de las más soft que ponen el foco el motivar y dirigir coMportamientos , poniendo el foco en el COLABORADOR E INTEGRADOR como pieza clave en una organización.
A great book to learn best practices for change management within complex systems that often stubbornly resist innovation. Keep in by your bedside and read it again and again!
I hate this book. It's a brilliant book, I gave it 4 stars, but I hate it. Very insightful. But written for old school managers who see their job as getting other people to do things they otherwise would not.
Some parts are really good, but others are very long to explain a simple idea or put an example. Nevertheless, some cases helped me to identify patterns in organizational behavior.
An eye opener. It will give you a different perspective on management. Worth the read. Sometimes it gets ‘jargon filled’ but it will definitely help you in your business life.
Six Simple Rules provides managers with an alternative to the two management approaches (hard, metric driven; and soft, mind-set driven) that the authors suggest have overcomplicated, and thus diminished the ability of organizations to achieve their full potential.
The underlying point of this analysis is: the biggest problem faced by organizations is that people in the organization don't do their best work and don't cooperate with one another to achieve the best results for the organization.
Managers and leaders have been trapped by management theories that abstract employees into mechanistic parts or strive to grasp organizational zeitgeist (intellectualizing collective behaviors). The solution proposed is for managers to get out of the office (where they can safely intellectualize about how to solve abstract problems), engage with employees, figure out what they actually do, and empower them to do their work in ways that require them to cooperate with one another for the good of the organization.
The six rules are illustrated with case studies of anonymized corporations (service, transportation and production) with which the authors consulted.
There are sidebars that synthesize the key points of the rules. This is more effective in the print than the Kindle version. In the Kindle version the sidebar is plunked into the middle of the chapter. I think publishers with an eye toward digital content need to spend a bit more time thinking about digital layout on the kindle. Cooperation between publishers and Amazon would be beneficial for consumers. Sadly there is no way to apply pain points since digital books are generally not returned if they have some value. In this case, the "sidebars" aren't terribly distracting, but they'd perhaps be better placed in a consolidated appendix or maybe between chapters.
There also seemed to be a gap between the abstracted rule and the case study, leaving me wondering how I would go apply the rule inside my kind of organization (education sector). This was in part remedied in the Conclusion, where the authors laid out a process that helps one envision implementing a conversion to a six rules approach.
Overall an interesting and thought provoking read.