I am currently studying abroad in a non-English speaking country and as much as I would like to say I'm handling it with the pizzazz of Professor Smith's students who go native, the truth is I more often stumble around feeling lost and frustrated. So every time Professor Smith loses her cool in this book and describes snapping at the people around her, I felt secretly vindicated.
See, Mom? I'm not the only person who whines about feeling beat down and exhausted while living in a foreign country.
Of course, Professor Smith has an excuse. She contracted a jungle fever. I guess I am just whiny.
But I read for those moments. Those moments when Professor Smith stops reporting monotonous, unoriginal inanities about readers' reactions to Jane Austen and just...reflects on travel. The moments when she wanders around bookshops and chats with strangers. The moments when she actually shows some realness.
Because for the most part, this book comes across as a very careful, very sanitized, and fairly politically correct look at a few reading groups she managed to pull together while traveling around South America. And as much as that sounds exciting...it really wasn't.
The book clubs all sounded the same. It did not matter if they were discussing Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, or Emma. The same comments about Jane Austen and her applicability to modern audiences get rehashed ad nauseam with the same results and conclusions. While this ought to have been "further proof" of the author's hypothesis about Austen's universal applicability, it mostly left me saying, "Yeah, duh."
Perhaps because the author is translating conversations that took place in Spanish, or perhaps because her own Spanish was still rather basic, the conversations and commentary all sounded very...basic. Juvenile, even? Partially I think the fault lies with me. I've read a lot about Jane Austen so I approach some of these questions with a lot more nuance and background than the readers Professor Smith picks up almost at random. But also partially I think the problem lies with the fact that despite Professor's Smith optimistic and grand plan to form Austen reading groups across South America, most of her readers are exhausted, regular people who often either didn't finish the book or want to comment on the movies instead. Does it still make the writing interesting? For sure, but it lacks the academic edge I was looking for. It turned any "evidence" the book provides about readers and Austen into little more than anecdotes.
I like what the author tried to do. I just don't think it worked the way she planned and it falls short of really making much of a difference in the Austen literature.
Finally, though, the author includes her own romance into the storyline...and it kind of drove me bonkers. It was cute, sort of, by the end. But for the most I kept wanting to shout:
"DIEGO CAN GO DIE IN A HOLE FOR ALL I CARE."
Not that I have anything against this Diego person. Okay, maybe I hold his mustache against him. But I'm sure he is a great guy.
The thing is, the author keeps harping on him like we should care. Yet since her book emphasize Jane Austen and travel, the main characters of this work are Jane Austen and travel. Any interruptions to talk about Professor Amy Elizabeth Smith and her Maybe Boyfriend always felt like a distraction from the main theme. And since the resolution to her romance doesn't really come about till the very end, the distraction for the most part felt repetitive and pointless.
Just because Jane Austen focused on relationships does not mean we care about Professor Smith's relationships.
Actually, though, I think I would have been more interested in Professor Smith's relationships if it didn't feel so very...un-Austen. If you're semi-dating/shacking up with someone, casually wanting some other guy to kiss you or mentioning you expect your significant other to also date around while you travel really kills any sense of romance.
To summarize:
Travel = sanitized. (She clearly does not want to offend any of her hosts which makes sense but also drops any drama)
Jane Austen = Jane Austen is popular with readers?! Who would have thought!
Romance = Cute but why?
Best parts was when she was sick and hated everything and everyone.
And finally, because I want to out of context vent my spleen:
THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA ARE NOT ALLEGORY AND I WILL FIGHT YOU.
MR. KNIGHTLEY IS THE BOMB.COM AND DON'T YOU JUDGE HIS CAPACITY FOR ROMANCE.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH MR. BINGLEY.
And in lower case letters because I officially call this Jane Austen themed season over (for now), we all need to seriously chill with the Mr. Darcy love. He's good but have you met Mr. Tilney?