Patricia Cornwell published her 24th Kay Scarpetta novel – “Chaos” – back in 2016. At that time, I was more than willing to let Kate and her family of supporting characters ride off into the sunset because the books had gotten very formula-matic and repetitive. How many times can a villain supposedly die and then return to rage havoc on our protagonists? Also, the characters were so predictable that they had become caricatures of themselves. The time for a break felt right.
Five years later and a couple of other less than stellar novels, Cornwell returned to her primary series and most popular character, Kay Scarpetta, publishing “Autopsy” in 2021. However, I struggled with the primary characters because they didn’t change. Marino was still belligerent and disrespectful of everyone he came into contact with. Dorothy was selfish and ignorant. Lucy was brilliant, yet socially inept. Benton was handsome, quiet, and a great profiler. Kay still new her stuff, but remained challenged in her professional life, constantly having to defend her decisions. And yes, that led me to give the book a disappointing two-star review.
Because of that, I have read and reviewed the 25th Kay Scarpetta novel – “Livid” – under a bit of self-induced protest. You can do that when your read a free copy from the local library. No money out of pocket and the only risk is the time spent reading it in case there’s no improvement in the storytelling and development in the characters.
“Livid” kicks off with Kay sitting on the witness stand, testifying in a major murder trial. Kay’s testimony is causing serious trouble for the prosecution. As the Chief Medical Examiner, she is supposed to defend their case and the cause of death. Unfortunately, in this case, the original autopsy was not performed correctly by the pathologist who is no longer alive, and Kay’s subsequent follow-up work has caused her to change the cause of death from asphyxiation to drowning. At least that’s her professional opinion – accident rather than murder.
Then things get worse when Kay receives even more disturbing news. Judge Chilton, presiding over the case, gets a shocking surprise. The judge’s sister has been found dead. The initial evidence seems to present a home invasion situation that went wrong. However, there didn’t seem to be anything stolen. Even more strangely, her garden is full of dead plants and insects, which seems very unusual and makes no sense.
Kay, her family, and work team are suddenly thrust into a 48 hours storm of multiple murders, a jury deciding a national case against the backdrop of violent turning protests, and enemies who want to destroy her professional career…
There were some interesting moments in this book, but the return of Kay Scarpetta continues to be a disappointment for me. Cornwell is not creating something new and refreshing, but rather continues to rely on her plotting methodology of solving a mystery over a condensed two-to-three-day timeframe, an approach that she established and perfected, then used repetitively over and over again until it just got old. Would the readers be happy with the same old or want something new? To be fair, I can only answer that question for myself.
As stated in my previous review of “Autopsy”, my problem is simply this. The characters never develop, grow, change, or evolve. They are way too predictable and obvious. I challenge anyone to name one book in the series in which other members of the family did not know more about one of Kay’s murder investigations than she did herself. There probably is one, but I cannot think of it. In addition, the plotlines also follow the same formula and structure, which includes weak, frustrating, and unfulfilled endings.
WARNING - **SPOILERS AHEAD** - you will want to have read the book or your reading experience may be negatively influenced.
Just like her previous outing – “Autopsy” – the structure of the novel was the same. Everything takes place over a period of less than 48 hours. It is all slammed together in a wham-bam-thank-you-reader storytelling experience.
Day 1 - The first 139 pages covers Kay’s appearance as a witness in court and then travel to a murder scene. Granted, background was filled in, but wow. The next 113 pages up through page 252 covered the inspection of the body, inspecting the murder site, going home, and debrief in the kitchen while eating. This covered from about 3 pm – sometime past midnight.
Day 2 – covers pages 253 – 339, including the culmination of the primary two mystery plotlines, but not several of the inter-related sub-plots.
Epilogue – The following Saturday night covers pages 340 -351, which tries to wrap up those various sub-plots in a very weak and frustratingly incomplete manner.
The reason that I share this outline is because it has become a repeated pattern for each of the Kay Scarpetta novels. It’s predictable and over-used by Cornwell. It also contributes to some major problems.
- Way too much time spent on the scientific research, which overwhelms and almost drowns out the story at time.
- No character development whatsoever. As I’ve noted in previous reviews, there hasn’t been any for many books now and no hint of change.
- The primary action and major plot developments occur outside of the primary characters and offstage from the reader. The core people involved are constantly informed of the key activities propelling the plot forward. They don’t actually experience the events first hand. They come in after those events and then react to what has already happened.
- There’s more frustration. Cornwell spends 339 pages having multiple bad guys/ladies treat Kay horribly and being downright abusive – politically, physically, and verbally – to say the least. More than most any character deserves in my humble opinion. Then to make matters worse, Cornwell doesn’t really provide any sense of redemption or closure for Kay. Instead, in the epilogue a text is sent informing that two of those abusers will be transitioned into different professional jobs so they won’t interact with her (supposedly). What??? Seriously??? After 339 pages of mistreatment, that is how the author wishes to payoff of the reader? This passive ending is so frustrating, and I should mention it is the identical weak ending that was in the previous novel, “Autopsy”. It’s so disrespectful to the reader that words don’t describe how disappointing this was to experience, not only one, but two books in a row.
Overall, I cannot give it more than two stars. I can only hope you enjoy it more than I did. I really do…