What do you think?
Rate this book
Revolutions in the Earth: James Hutton and the True Age of the World
A compelling biography of the visionary founder of modern geology—a man who challenged orthodox beliefs to prove the antiquity of the earth.
Paperback
First published August 1, 2004
1 person is currently reading
70 people want to read
About the author
Stephen Baxter
405 books2,622 followersStephen Baxter is a trained engineer with degrees from Cambridge (mathematics) and Southampton Universities (doctorate in aeroengineering research). Baxter is the winner of the British Science Fiction Award and the Locus Award, as well as being a nominee for an Arthur C. Clarke Award, most recently for Manifold: Time. His novel Voyage won the Sidewise Award for Best Alternate History Novel of the Year; he also won the John W. Campbell Award and the Philip K. Dick Award for his novel The Time Ships. He is currently working on his next novel, a collaboration with Sir Arthur C. Clarke. Mr. Baxter lives in Prestwood, England.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
July 13, 2024
Stephen Baxter is best known as a science fiction author, and a damn good one at that. This is the second of his non-fiction works that I've read, and I must say that his fiction is his strength. "Revolutions in the Earth" is a fanboy history of James Hutton, an 18th-century intellectual who laid the groundwork for modern geology and, in the process, eventually banished the so-called "young Earth" theory from the halls of science. But Hutton's story was not nearly as straightforward as that. In leading us through the weeds, Baxter loses sight of the possibility that his reader may be less interested in the minutiae of Hutton's life and journey through the swamp of academia than Baxter himself is. In summary, this subject captivated Baxter's imagination and enthusiasm, without him considering its potential appeal to others. So I'm not saying that you won't like this book; I'm just saying that a substantial essay on the topic would have suited me fine.
It doesn't help that Hutton's life story is somewhat anti-climactic. He was a brilliant thinker but a muddled writer, unable to put his theories into concise enough language to capture the imagination of most contemporary readers in his lifetime. Because his prose was so impenetrable and poorly organized, many of those who did read it fundamentally misinterpreted it, including other scientists with their own axes to grind. Consider the following facts: He left his major work on the subject, which described his theories, field work, and a synthesis of experiments conducted by him and various colleagues, half-complete at the time of his death. In addition, the predominance of the so-called "Neptunist" theory of the origins of the Earth's geology that held sway at the time rendered Hutton a fringe figure within academia. Finally, much of his work in manuscript was either destroyed or lost (including his entire collection of geological specimens, collected over the course of a lifetime). Given these facts, it is not surprising that it took several more generations to fully recognize his central accomplishment—establishing a probable time scale for the age of our planet.
Does Hutton's story have interest and appeal? At times, yes, and this despite the fact that insights into his personal life are spotty at best. But all too often, Baxter draws us into tangential details about secondary figures in Hutton's tale, which often come off as mere padding on a subject for which insufficient primary source materials exist. Obviously, this would be a fascinating read for anyone with a direct interest in geology or earth sciences. For the rest of us, unless you're a Baxter completest (like me), you might want to stick to "Evolution" or "The Light of Other Days."
It doesn't help that Hutton's life story is somewhat anti-climactic. He was a brilliant thinker but a muddled writer, unable to put his theories into concise enough language to capture the imagination of most contemporary readers in his lifetime. Because his prose was so impenetrable and poorly organized, many of those who did read it fundamentally misinterpreted it, including other scientists with their own axes to grind. Consider the following facts: He left his major work on the subject, which described his theories, field work, and a synthesis of experiments conducted by him and various colleagues, half-complete at the time of his death. In addition, the predominance of the so-called "Neptunist" theory of the origins of the Earth's geology that held sway at the time rendered Hutton a fringe figure within academia. Finally, much of his work in manuscript was either destroyed or lost (including his entire collection of geological specimens, collected over the course of a lifetime). Given these facts, it is not surprising that it took several more generations to fully recognize his central accomplishment—establishing a probable time scale for the age of our planet.
Does Hutton's story have interest and appeal? At times, yes, and this despite the fact that insights into his personal life are spotty at best. But all too often, Baxter draws us into tangential details about secondary figures in Hutton's tale, which often come off as mere padding on a subject for which insufficient primary source materials exist. Obviously, this would be a fascinating read for anyone with a direct interest in geology or earth sciences. For the rest of us, unless you're a Baxter completest (like me), you might want to stick to "Evolution" or "The Light of Other Days."
Displaying 1 of 1 review