Quick synopsis
: A city dog is abandoned, finds a new dog-family, then finds a new owner.
Brief opinion
: This book was a rollercoaster, but not in a good way. At first I thought it would be a great talking animal book, but I quickly grew to not like it so much. Plus the message it sends in the end is the most confusing part of all.
Plot
: A puppy is adopted by a family. Days later the wife gives birth to a baby. The puppy shows curiosity about the baby, so the father abandons the puppy in the park. (Let's ignore all the logic holes of this whole part.)
In the park, the nameless puppy is found by a pack of dogs (in the book it's called a "team" of dogs, which makes sense for city dogs). He gets a name (Waggit, stupidest name ever, because he wags it (his tail) a lot). The dogs teach him how to survive in the "wild" of the park.
There's a war with another team, lots of fight and hunting for food, and more horrible naming. (A loner dog joins the team, so they name her... Alona. A loner. A lona. Ugh.)
All in all, most of these team dogs were abandoned by their humans, and most are really abused/have a hard time as wild dogs, so rightly so they hate humans.
In the end, Waggit gets caught and taken to the pound. A woman adopts him, and nearly instantly Waggit settles down and gets used to being owned again. He makes one trip back to the park to let his team know he's alive and okay, then he settles back into a life of "slavery" because at least that way he gets a warm place to sleep and three meals a day.
Writing/editing
: Technical-wise it was fine, but very soon into the story, the dogs seemed really not very dog-like. Their language use was also odd (territory was called a "realm" for example, and all female dogs were "Lady [name]"). I liked "team" instead of "pack", but since the dogs didn't "speak human", how did they pick up "team" to use?
For some odd reason, accents seemed to come and go. The dog characters would sometimes talk very "street" ("I ain't got no time for dis!") and a couple paragraphs later they talked in a normal way.
What I Liked/What I Didn’t Like
: The only character I liked was Tazar, the leader of the wild dog team. He was the only character that was more than one-note.
I really, really, really do not understand the message this book was trying to send. Waggit and his pack were in full agreement that being enslaved to humans was the worst possible state for dogs. Life was hard, but the park dogs never starved. But in the blink of an eye, Waggit was fine going back to being under a human's control again. I wish the author would have explained it more (in the story's world, is it the natural state for dogs to want to be owned?). The seeming message (it's okay to not be free as long as you get food and shelter) is uncomfortable to me. (In real life, of course dogs should all have good homes as opposed to living on the street in packs, but the dogs in this book could talk, store food for winter, build simple shelters, plan battles, used newspapers as blankets... they weren't real dogs).
Rating: 1-Hated / 2-Disliked / 3-Okay / 4-Liked / 5-Loved
: ⭐️⭐️ ½ - 2.5 stars. I didn't like the book, but I didn't hate it either.