Do you ever read a book and wish the author would just shut the fuck up? Because I just did.
If my dad hadn't given this to me for this past Christmas, I would have DNF'd it from the very first page. I don't fuck around with books or people who clearly hate men and walk around like they're the most “woke” person to ever exist and if you disagree with a single thing they have to say you're clearly a trash human being.
Buckle up because this is going to be a scorcher of a review.
First off, I don’t like anthologies. But I do love me a badass bitch. So my dad saw this somewhere online and figured my love of badasses would override my dislike of short stories, which is fair. This could have been really interesting and I could have learned a lot about the women featured, if only this book had been about them, and not the author’s personal thoughts and opinions on all of the men in their lives and the surrounding circumstances.
From the absolute get go, the author is rude, aggressive and wholly unappealing to read. The Q&A at the beginning is unnecessary, I do not care why this woman has decided to write this book. I want to read about cool women, not the author. For someone who CLEARLY hates men, boy does she give a lot of her time, energy and paper space to talking about them. She complains about them in the intro, she responds to their social media posts in the book and responds with such vitriol and anger towards everything that put me in a constant state of eye rolling. My gripe with this is the fact that who does this woman think she’s speaking to? If men have given her shit online (which I’m sure they have), they sure as hell aren’t reading your book. If you want to appeal to women (which I’m assuming she did), why are you screaming about men and preaching to the choir? You’re shouting just because you learned how to be bitchy and sarcastic and come off as not giving a fuck about men in any way but you VERY clearly do. Wait till we get to the Trump part.
In any of the biographies that dealt with women in politics, the author somehow brings up Trump. She only calls him 45 but we all know who she’s talking about and it is almost never relevant to bring him up. Why she felt the need to, I don’t know. AND THEN!!! I am turning the page to chapter 45 (out of 50) and the whole page is taken up with “you know how some cultures skip floor 13 in tall buildings? We’re going to do the same for 45” and then it becomes chapter 46. I almost screamed. This author, this woman wastes AN ENTIRE PAGE of her own book(!!!) dedicated to a man she hates. FOR WHAT. For a book about women, my main takeaway shouldn’t be how much the author hates men!!! It shouldn’t be about an entire page dedicated to a terrible man! It should be about the WOMEN and the impact they have made on the world and yet I barely remember anything about the women because all I can recall is all the shitty comments she made about men. It’s asinine.
There was also at least one line that struck me very wrong, in that the description of one of the women was inherently sexist. She describes her as “she may have been a woman, but she was tough as shit and stood approximately six feet tall and weighed around 200 pounds.” …does this mean she was not the normal standard for a woman? For the time period (late 1800s), sure but it seemed so weird to me to point this out like why are we commenting on what she looked like with the prefix of “she may have been a woman”? It’s gross.
Another line was about Josephine Baker, who was described as performing an act “she knew the whole theme was problematic and gross, but she was making a fuckton of money and living her best life, so she figured she was the winner here.” It’s implied that Baker thought this (I don’t know if she did, the author has clearly never learned how to cite a damn thing) but it is also implied that the author knows it’s gross but doesn’t care, because… women? And like what the fuck, bestie. Do we only care about gross and problematic things when men do them? Because that certainly ain’t the vibe now, is it?
About halfway through the book the editing quality plummeted, all of a sudden there were words missing in sentences and missing spaces between words. I truly thought the author had written this with ZERO editing until I read the notes at the end that thanked the editor. Then I was shocked someone could have done such a bad job.
There were also a few women included who I thought hadn’t really done enough to be a part of the book, I wasn’t impressed nor did I think they were “a badass.” The author didn’t really give a criteria on what she thought made these women worthy of inclusion, so I guess that’s just based on personal preference. I did think the inclusion of the author’s mom as the final chapter was a nice, unexpected way to close the book. It sounds like that woman went through a lot, unfortunately.
My end take on the book is I REALLY wish the author would have kept all her personal thoughts/opinions etc to her damn self. They added literally nothing to the book or to these women’s stories, they were just expletive-filled filler sentences. And I love swearing lmao but this woman honestly took it too far. You don’t need to use “fuck” all the time. And it seems like the author was aware of how much of her opinions she inserted because there was a LOT more of it in the entries that the woman was dead, those that were still alive at the time of writing were given a lot more respect and dignity to their stories. It’s unfortunate that the author thought her thoughts and opinions were so important to override the stories of these women. I would recommend skipping this entirely, and just looking up the women on your own time, in their own words (as much as possible). These women honestly deserved better.