“They were in a ragged square, back to back on the hilltop, and even as we watched I saw the glitter of bayonets as they levelled their pieces, and a thin volley crashed out across the valley. The Afghans yelled louder than ever, and gave back, but then they surged in again, the Khyber knives rising and falling as they tried to hack their way into the square. Another volley, and they gave back yet again, and I saw one of the figures on the summit flourishing a sword as though in defiance. He looked for all the world like a toy soldier…”
- George MacDonald Fraser, Flashman
Thomas Hughes’s 1857 novel Tom Brown’s School Days follows the travails of a young student at Rugby School, in Warwickshire, England, as he struggles towards gentleman-hood. The novel is credited as being among the first of a robust literary subgenre, that of the boarding school novel. More pertinent for our purposes is the fact that its antagonist is a drunken bully named Flashman, who is eventually expelled from Rugby School.
Utilizing a gloriously ridiculous conceit, George MacDonald Fraser takes this supporting actor from a mid-nineteenth century novel and repurposes him as the title character in The Flashman Papers, a 12-book series of which Flashman is the introductory volume.
First published in 1969, Flashman and its progeny have gained the status of cult classic, following the exploits of British military officer Harry Paget Flashman from 1839 to 1868. It is presented as Flashman’s own account of his exploits, told in the first-person with Fraser acting as a mere “editor” and commenting on certain points by way of endnotes. Though not as clever as it might have once appeared, Fraser’s gambit remains a solid setup, and is executed to near perfection, with Flashman insinuating himself into the historical record so well that you start to forget he is an invention.
The problem, though, as I will get to shortly, is Flashman himself.
***
Flashman begins in 1839, with Flashman’s expulsion from the Rugby School, his return home to his wealthy father, and his purchase of a commission with the 11th Regiment of Light Dragoons. Much of the early going – which can be tedious – is devoted to giving us a glimpse of Flashman’s nature, which is seldom flattering. His drinking and womanizing force him into a duel, into a marriage, and out of the Hussars. With his career prematurely stunted, Flashman sets out for India, where he joins the staff of General William Elphinstone.
From there, the plot follows the markers of the so-called First Anglo-Afghan War, during which Great Britain marched into Kabul to reinstall Shah Shujah as emir, found themselves isolated by the Ghilzai – who the British foolishly refused to pay – then beat a hasty retreat through the dark defiles of the Hindu Kush, losing almost an entire army along the way.
Flashman, of course, is right in the middle of all of it.
***
The First Anglo-Afghan War is one of a series of grand imperial misadventures suffered by the British Empire, and offers more than enough by way of drama to support a book. At its best – and Flashman can be quite good – Fraser ingeniously puts Flashman right in the middle of things, without ever straining credulity. Having read a few nonfiction titles on this period, I found the historical underpinnings to be quite strong. Even when Fraser twists the accepted story a bit, he does so in a way that reminds us that “history” can never be entirely objective, as it is a collection of subjective perspectives.
Still, getting the history right is the easiest thing about historical fiction. Flashman succeeds because it makes the past live again. This starts with the real-life characters – such as Elphinstone, Alexander Burnes, Lady Sale, and a young Queen Victoria – who spend time with Flashman on the stage. Instead of being gaudy cameos, Fraser somehow turns these personages into meaningful presences, which is kind of amazing, since most of them are only briefly drawn with Flashman’s caustic pen. Flashman’s observations about the men and women he meets, and the events he observes, feels contemporary, which is to say, authentic, and this authenticity helps to keep the oft-careening train of this tale from going entirely off the tracks.
The action, too, is marvelous. There is a deadly game of tug-o-war, a doomed escape through narrow mountain passes, a desperate last stand viewed from a distance, and a bloody skirmish that begins with Flashman weeping uncontrollably. With unerring precision, Fraser nails one set piece after another. For a book that is often sold on the basis of its outré leading man and its dark humor, Flashman does an exceptional job of delivering some legitimate thrills and spectacle.
***
But we have to talk about Flashman.
On the back cover, Flashy is described as an “adventurer,” a “cad,” and an “incorrigible scoundrel.” None of these adjectives are necessarily compliments, but they also connote a certain laddish harmlessness.
This is not an accurate representation.
Flashman has also been widely described as politically incorrect in his views of nonwhite races, and of women.
This is putting things too mildly.
Within the first thirty pages, Flashman tries to rape his father’s mistress, which gives him no misgivings. Later on, he rapes an Afghani woman, which he fully acknowledges. It’s one thing to accept Flashman’s racist views and language – which are noxious, yet also accurate to the setting – and quite another to condone his admittedly criminal behavior.
We live in the age of antiheroes, but Flashman isn’t one of them. There is no complexity to the man. Most of his antics can be attributed to the essential cowardliness and selfishness that forms his core. He fails upwards, constantly. Sometimes, this can be bleakly, even jaw-droppingly funny. At other times, his abusive patterns make it really hard to care about his fate. There came a point about midway through Flashman where Flashman was threatened with emasculation, and I wished fervently for it to happen, for such a reward had been richly earned.
***
Flashman is an intentionally offensive novel, featuring an unreflective and seemingly-sociopathic front-man. What kept me going, though, and what made this fascinating to read, is Flashman’s effectiveness as satire. If you look beyond the too-provocative, in-your-face comicality, there is a quietly savage deconstruction of the British Empire at work.
Up until the mid-twentieth century, the British Empire was widely celebrated as a selfless civilizing mission, rather than a vast commercial enterprise. Numerous novels supported this perspective, centering on the fearless British soldier marching off to pacify savage lands. Fraser’s Flashman is an effortless takedown of those earlier efforts. Who is Flashman, after all, but a funhouse-mirror version of Harry Feversham from A.W. Mason’s The Four Feathers? In Flashman’s unearned success, his lofty elevation to hero, we are given a potent demonstration of how disasters are gilded, how the brutal projection of power is masked from the public, and how terrible deeds are rationalized in the name of god, crown, and country.
Typically, a novel’s central character – however conflicted, haunted, or damaged – moves toward redemption. There is nothing redeeming about Harry Flashman, a reality that emerges early, and repeats itself often. In a way, though, this makes perfect sense. Flashman cannot be redeemed because he is part of an irredeemable imperial project.