Let me start by saying I have read a ton of historical fiction- Phillipa Gregory, Jean Plaidy, Sandra Byrd, etc. I am not new to this genre.
I picked this book up at the library thinking it would be very interesting to read a novel from the point of view of Madge Shelton. I hadn't read anything from her POV before so I thought it would be very fresh.
It was not. I mean, it kind of was. Her pov was new and her character was fresh. But other than being very loyal to Queen Anne and feeling like adultery was a sin and Henry Norris was despicable, "Pretty Madge" really had little actual character. You don't feel like she is a strong main character or like her character will stay with you after you put the book down. Thats a similar problem that I had with a Sandra Byrd novel I read recently. It seems like a lot of historical fiction is more focused on telling the story (in Tudor novels, usually the story of Queen Anne or one of Henry's other Queens) and less about developing a deep and lasting actual character. Madge could have been a dozen other girls and it wouldn't have made any real difference.
Beyond that, I just found the book very lacking in depth and meaning. It felt more like a light romance between Madge and Arthur, with a light story of her dealings with Queen Anne, than the riveting and meaningful drama of a story like Gregory's "The Other Boleyn Girl". I thought Madge's affair with King Henry would be a focal point of the book, when in fact it was handled (with the exception of their first time together) to be very lacking detail. There was no exploration of the relationship between Madge and the King. He wanted her for her body, and she found him horrid. The end. There was little conversation between her and the King or any real meaning in it.
Speaking of Queen Anne, I felt like her character was just...off. Queen Anne was not the enticing, clever, ambitious woman I've come to know and love through dozens of other authors. In this novel, Anne is closer to the original Queen Catherine than the firebrand I am used to. Although she does fly at Henry in rages and argue with him over his romances, in general she is peaceful and seeking religious reform for the good of her people, sewing shirts for the poor, and accepting the possibility of going into a nunnery because "she only wanted to be Queen out of love for Henry" and that she really, truly loves him as a calm, gentle wife who seeks to please him above all things. This just did not fit with everything I've read about Anne Boleyn before. Granted, I didn't know her, I don't know how she truly was, but the picture of Anne history has created is a vivacious, flirtatious, firey, dangerous, strong, ambitious and even petty woman. That was not the woman portrayed in this book by any means.
But what bugged me most is this: AND IF YOU READ NOTHING ELSE IN THIS REVIEW, READ THIS:
The author claims her family descends directly from Madge Shelton. At the end of the novel, Madge is pregnant with Arthur Brandon's child. Arther's father is the infamous Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, most powerful man in England besides the King and Duke Norfolk. This man was married to the Kings own sister, Mary Tudor. At the end of the novel, it is implied that Arthur gets Thomas to break his marriage with Madge, since Arther is the father of her child, and Madge marries Arthur Brandon and lives happily ever after with their family.
THIS WOULD MEAN THAT THE AUTHOR HERSELF IS A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF MADGE SHELTON, CLOSE COUSIN OF QUEEN ANNE BOLEYN, AND CHARLES BRANDON (VIA ARTHUR) HUSBAND OF PRINCESS MARY TUDOR, ESSENTIALLY MAKING HER FAMILY PRACTICALLY ROYAL.
FALSE. FALSE FALSE FALSE.
IF you read the Q&A in the back of the book, you will see a SMALL SECTION that clarifies that Madge Shelton did NOT end up with Arthur Brandon, but did in fact remain married to Thomas and have seven children from him- meaning their authors family is descendant of Madge Shelton and Thomas Nobody.
It really, really bugged me that the author chose to end the book in this way, when there is no reason at all, historically speaking, to believe that Madge was ever pregnant with Arthur Brandon's child nor did she end up marrying him. I just find it very arrogant to mislead the reader into thinking that her family is descendant of a much-closer-to-royalty-line than they actually are. Yes its clarified in the back of the book, but not everyone sits and reads the Q&A at the end of a novel.
Anyway really, overall, I'm glad I got this book from the library and didn't actually pay for it. It isn't pure terrible, its decent if there isn't much else to read, but I would not particularly recommend it to anyone or read it again myself.