This is overall a well written book, except there are every so often flaws in syntax; meaning that one is reading and suddenly a sentence does not make sense at all. This is sad as a good proof reader could have easily avoided this. Though the text is voluminous, and minute mistakes like these can plague manuscripts, one would think that it would behoove the author, editors, proof readers and publishers to make sure that their product is up to scratch.
On the story itself, Fraser does an okay job, but it is clear that she struggled with making her subject a) human and b) sympathetic. This may seem odd, yet while she shows how Princess and later Queen Caroline, was maligned by Prince George and late King George IV, she does not portray her beyond being reckless, silly and vapid. We do not get a sense as to who this woman really was, and why so many people really loved her. Much time is spent on all of the accusations, her unwillingness to kowtow to the times and the court, the various men she slept with, but again, there is little in terms of depth when it comes to her person. What happens is that they come off is players within a drama, rather than people who lived and moved and breathed. There is evidence that she was not only a prop for the radicals, but in touch with many of them. Did they have correspondence with her? While she destroyed all of this evidence, did they? And if they did not, could this have been unearthed? Were there letters for instance between her and Sir Walter Scott? When you have ladies such as Lady Caroline Lamb riding in the rain for the Queen during her trial, and Lady Caroline was very political, then surely there had to be more to the story.
On the personal side, given that her Italian was not that polished, what were her letters like to Pergami? Do they survive? What did his daughter, who she left the estate to, think of her? Did she write anything of substance? These are just some thoughts, but the point is so much time was spent on the Delicate Investigation and the trial, that the woman herself, was left in the shadows. She was surely, given her bravery, more than a silly woman, therefore doesn't it seem imperative that this is shown? I would beg Fraser to go back, rewrite this, especially for errors in syntax, and then do further research on the woman herself. Moreover, as an aside, I think it would be interesting and lend some flavor to it, as well as gain her some modern readers, if she took the tack of comparing her situation to Princess Diana, and Prince Charles, who were also the Prince and Princess of Wales. Their turbulent relationship and that of Caroline and George, have some striking similarities. In any event, Caroline needs to be further fleshed out, as a being that lived; surely she is owed this much.