I read far too few novels, and my life suffers for it. The same can be said for poetry. In fact, I am one of the dwindling number of people who feels there is more to be done as long as there are unread books which rest upon the shelf. And there are always more bookshelves, somewhere. So I'm glad to say I finished a novel several days ago which still has me thinking about it, pondering its images and intent.
Fishboy, by Mark Richard, tells of a young orphan who spends the first years of his life in an island fishing town. The boy, known only as Fishboy to himself, his acquaintances (he doesn't seem to have any real friends), and us the readers, still has the fantastic, mythic eyes of an ostracized child through which filter everything he encounters. He lives and works in this fishing village, diving for shellfish and submerged sodas, until the day when a strange shipload of men--murderers, freaks, fishermen, and possibly pirates--dock at the town and burn it to the ground before leaving again. Rather than seeking shelter and comfort with the humiliated villagers, Fishboy decides to cast his lot with the dangerous men who have tied his meager belongings to a kite, set them afire, and let them float away into the night.
After this point, most of the book becomes a serial retelling of this band's stories, magical realism relayed to us by the slightly unreliable narration of the boy. It's a clever if easy ruse on Richard's part-- are the fantastic elements heightened or exaggerated because of the narrator's age and mentality? It's entirely possible, although the men in the crew seem quite superstitious and prone to exaggeration themselves. They are storytellers and seamen who seem to simultaneously believe in their stories and recognize them as problematic, larger than life fables. Because of such complicated layers of narrative, the usual function of magical realism-- a forced recognition that the world is not always as simple and straightforward as it seems, that there are many shades of experience which cannot be "rationally" explained--borders on being subverted here.
But the imaginative attractiveness of magic realism is kept intact. There are striking images throughout this series of tales which will haunt me for a long time: the crew member who returned home to find his wife sleeping with another man, kills them both, and then sews their bodies together with thousands of tiny stitches. The body of John, who is the crew's leader-- though not their captain-- is tattooed all over with maps of places he's traveled, with each place corresponding to a notable period of his life. The true captain of the ship, who is hidden away in the wheelhouse, is a fatherly man whose body, crowned by a flowing mane of silver hair which has been that color since birth, is turned inside out so his vulnerable muscles and tissues must always be protected from exposure to the outside world. Watt, the captain, is fatherly and wise, and his most notable line in the book is eventually adopted by Fishboy himself: "I, too, began as a boy."
I've seen a comment on this book which identifies it as a coming of age novel, and notes that learning to tell stories is a crucial part of that process here. Indeed, at one point early on, Fishboy states that he barely knows his own story, and doesn't have much to say about himself. But the stories which he repeats throughout the rest of the novel are so rich that I can't refrain from some analysis which very much lines this piece up in the ars poetica/metafiction realms. As I read it, the fishboy is of course playing the allegorical role of the storyteller, and the tales that are given to him may or may not be his own, but they are heightened by his telling of them. Fishboy is caught between the worlds of the imagination and the devastatingly ordinary, and chooses to set sail with the fantastic interlopers who tear apart his somewhat commonplace world. And also suitably, it is the utterly modern machine--a nuclear submarine-- which destroys the cobbled phantasm of a ship which the Fishboy tries to make his home.
But even with all these strengths of the novel (and the language, oh the language, in which it is told--"I began as a boy, as a human-being boy, a boy who fled to sea, a boy with a whistling lisp and the silken-tipped fingers of another class" is the opening sentence, and the ear is seduced along from there), I'm sometimes left wondering what to do with all of these vibrantly drawn characters: should I read them as archetypes of outcasts, the metaphorically marginalized? Are they simply interesting diversions? Their heightened realizations make me want to do something with them other than let them be foils or guides to Fishboy himself, to read them metaphorically. And somehow they do read as manifestations of possibility for the boy, but if this is so, then the boy's future is bleak indeed.
In any case, this blog entry has now become nearly as long as the book itself-- I do tend to get swept away by ideas when I come across them in an inventive, image-driven presentation, and can sometimes write about them longer than I should. I just wish I weren't such a slow reader, so I could always be caught up in tempests of the imagination and intellect such as this one.