In the cracks and interstices of modern states (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran) live people who do and do not belong; nomads and other tribal peoples who negotiate a life with several governments.
This short work is a tribute to them, an account of them in concise stories and anecdotes. The slow courtesies of speech; a tribes’ immense tactfulness towards an old chief who has lost most of his eyesight but leads them out in action nevertheless, when obligation calls; this same chief with his antiquated ethic of an uttered word being a pledge, in a court of law that treats his party as bandits and in their eyes, in turn, is rude, inhumane and uncivilized.
In an interview the author says, “…it appears this type of collectivity is less tyrannical, more just, and has very simple rules of right and wrong, compared to other society. In fact, if you think about it, the amount of brutality committed in the cities and what we know as civilised society is far more than has ever been committed in tribal areas.” He is then asked about what makes them ‘harsh’, and he answers, “I don’t think I would call them harsh. They are, of course, hard – the land makes them hard, their fight for survival makes them hard. But they also have enormous tenderness, and love, and civilised behaviour. That is there too. So, it’s not all brutality and harshness, no, no.”
I am sad to see professional reviews reach for the word ‘brutal’, one after the other, and the worst of them fail to look past the ideas on ‘tribal Afghanistan’ they have brought to this book – fail to notice these elegant turns of mind and speech that he painstakingly portrays. The author wrote in the 70s, in a world innocent of Osama bin Laden or the Taliban; so that if I see another newspaper review telling us these are implicit in the setting or the narrative, I’ll scream. (Because history happens to these people, on the whole; history invades them. This is not a contemporary story, the author says in the interview; haven’t nomads been fettered by states for 2000 years?) Even so, in the 70s, this tribal world was on the brink of extinction; he almost claims so for the Baluch, with an exquisitely-written epitaph; and then there is the story of the nomad people whose ways are shut off one year by the government; it ends with a massacre, and after the massacre, starvation.
A few of these tribes live in poverty, either humbly or with an adversarial attitude; a few live well on the milk and fat of their flocks, until the state intervenes. They have relationships with governments home and foreign that go back to the Great Game and WWI, that are as various as the tribes themselves, their lifestyle, their ethics, the behaviour of women. Women play a large part in these stories, from the one who leads that disastrous crossing of an international line, under threat of guns, to those who abandon husbands, for better or worse fates. One important thing – he says this too in the interview – is that he wants to write how different the tribes are from one another. Those unfamiliar lump them together as an age-old cultural world.
The stories are not even in quality. Neither is the writing. I felt the three early stories were head and shoulders above the later. Once, just once, I thought he defected from his task, when he made a judgemental, outsider’s statement about the ‘character’ or ‘morals’ of a tribe entire – which is what this lovely book avoids. People have bad stories. A deeply ethical mullah ends violently insane. A girl scores a husband with the asset of a performing bear – wealth and status to her poor family’s eyes; but he is more concerned about his single asset than about her. The author’s aim is not that we universalise these stories (they have cruel husbands – mullahs were odd fish). He took these stories from life, from his experience as an administrator for decades around the tribal areas. He writes of them with respect and lament. Although his ethnographic fiction from the 70s was published to acclaim at the end of his life, he has the sorrow – as he alludes to in the interview I read – of knowing that the tribes, whose near-eradication he complained of then, have not won their battles for existence since.