Queen Esther is the subject of our school play this year, and the teacher writing the script said she started from this book, so I thought I’d read it and get a little head start. I expect us to do a much better job than this, though, since I was severely unimpressed.
First of all, Esther is just exceedingly passive. She’s just there being beautiful and humble and obedient and all, for pretty much most of the book. (And it took a long time just to get past the beauty pageants.) Her main accomplishment is getting a message to the king a couple of times. There was much more of an interesting plot with the king and Haman and Mordecai.
And I don’t know how much of this book was based on historical fact, vs. how much was the author’s fault, but an awful lot of the story just didn’t hold together. Why was is such a big deal to get messages to the king? It said they sent notes back and forth all the time, since he couldn’t often visit her. And the law about not approaching the king unbidden also specifies that he can just override that by pointing his sceptre, so why was she so concerned that he wouldn’t? And then he supposedly can’t undo a decree that he already passed, but then he effectively does (with the letter saying the Hebrews were “free... from the punishment decreed in our former letter”) but then for some reason they all still have to fight? And finally, after waiting to make sure the Jews killed all the Amalekites, Esther is now the queen of love and peace? Seems like she could have earned that title better by preventing the bloodshed in the first place.