If a twelfth century thinker believed in Miracles, Transubstantiation and the Resurrection of the Body, you'd think werwolves would be no problem. But as Bynum explores her topic in these essays, it becomes obvious that the clash between what thinkers accepted as part of their theology, and what they were adamant could not happen in the world they lived in, could be, unsurprisingly, contradictory.
Medieval people were no more gullible than their modern counterparts, indeed, the church's attitude towards miracles was much more skeptical than most modern people might believe, but given some of the 'first principles', medieval theology was a testing ground for even the most subtle of intellects. Bynum does a fine job of tiptoeing through the contradictions of st. Bernard's thinking without ever accepting the conclusion her evidence seems to suggest that the man was essentially confused.
The essays move around the topic, and because they were originally directed at different audiences, they vary in tone from the very specific linguistic analysis of St. Bernard's attempt to have one plus one equal two separate but joined ones, to more general discussions. Rather than driving a straight line towards any kind of conclusion, Bynum provides a great deal to think about.
I read this book because it was cited in a study of The Mabinogion, where metamorphosis and other forms of transformation are an accepted fact of life in the stories. Perhaps the value of Bynum's study, for a reader without a specific interest in St. Bernard, is the opening up of new ways of thinking about what's happening in those stories. Particularly, how the stories might have been part of a contemporary discourse of identity.
Gerald of Wales and his Irish Werwolf make several appearances, but the story seems to be taken out of the context of Gerald's own love of stories, and his willingness to report marvels and attempt to explain them. The story did trouble Gerald, but whether this was because it became the focus of other people's skepticism or his own is hard to tell. It has been suggested by Will Parker that the Irish priest in the story was misunderstood, in a complex interplay between Irish words for outcasts and their latin translations, but a belief in werwolves and transformations was a common belief amongst the people outside the world of Literate Latin theologians.
The focus on Werwolves is understandable, but limiting. While Bynum accepts that transformation was becoming a feature of vernacular literature at the time, her examples are limited. I was waiting for the Fourth branch to make an appearance, but it never did.
Pages 195-275 are devoted to notes. While these refer the reader to a wealth of material, there is no bibliography. Hence four stars instead of five.