Easily accessible lay-man's self-help meets story-telling book.
Let's start with the good: I loved the design of the book, which is delightful, as is the art that decorates the pages throughout the book. Reading about the stories themselves is entertaining and wholesome.
However, there are a couple jarring things that blocked me: I found this book way too mainstream for my liking, and simply had no patience for the tone of the authors. It felt too simplified and New Age-y, and very American, in a pop-y way. It's a book you'd expect from a very famous and popular tarot master and astrologist that has pumped out a lot of books for the masses. And that, Liz Greene has done: she's a major voice in the field. I somehow have the feeling that she's not such a rigorous Jungian analyst and scholar as I expected, which is caused by the fluffy approach, while promising weight and meaning. It feels rather... pretentious. I feel bad ripping into Liz like that, since she's a big name and has done a lot of impressive things.
As a Jungian analyst myself and specialist in symbolism and mythology for meaning, I thought this book was a must. But, I was wrong, it is more like a beginner's book for the lay-person who is just venturing into the world of myth and meaning, and hopes to find (some) solace and consolation, or, in short, a deeper meaning in their own life struggles.
The stories are summarized, which is fine, but tedious when familiar with the material and I found the commentary (unfortunately) rather exasperating and dull. From each story is extracted a single motif (such as parental bonds, love, betrayal, etc), and taken as an analogy to exemplify a certain point of view that may be of comfort to the reader in those situations.
The upside from this approach is that you can just flip open the book and read about the topics you're struggling with right now, and expect at least some resonancy in that particular story, which often works relieving and even a bit 'healing'. It gave me a sigh of relief and recognition myself reading it.
But, the downside, is that when you're not actually living a struggle described in the book, the lack of depth with its summarized style and linear explanations will grind you to a halt, in disconnection and boredom (like me). Furthermore, the biggest loss is that the symbols and characters are not individually amplified (elaborated upon), and only that single motif is described. That way, only that one motif is mentioned, and those are pretty much open doors for everyone, and hence not particularly insightful.
It feels sadly and symbolically, like a collection of moral-implicating fairytales (like Grimm's moral and virtue 'lessons'), which here, in this case, give that one piece of hope and meaning through the analogy in the story. It almost has this sort of berating quality, as it's so dumbed down from what it could have been, if this was a rigorous contribution to the field. Unfortunately, this is a book for the masses, who cannot satisfactorily interpret stories.
That is why I recommend everyone who wants to enricht his or her life with the beauty and power of the symbolism of mythology and fairytales to familiarize themselves with that 'symbolic language', so you can have your own personal experience. If you have no idea how to do that, you may find some practice and sense of meaning in this book as an entry into this field, and that purpose is well fulfilled with this book.
So, recommended for people who want a flip-through once in a while, or to beginners/amateurs, completionists and/or collectors. I would recommend Thomas Moore for material about finding peace and consolation. Joseph Campbell is the man to go to when you want more symbolism, anthropology and history (who is, as a result, more academic). And, I also recommend reading the classics yourself to get a personal taste and feeling for them.
However, it's still a nice little book that you can easily pull out and read a story and its commentary in 10 minutes, potentially fuelling you with some new hope and connection with your heart, which is nice. It's just not rigorous and as in-depth as I want it to be.