When choosing a book, how important is the company that published it?
I almost never notice who published the book.
I have a few publishers I especially like, but mostly I choose the book based on other criteria (story, author, etc.).
Not very important, but I usually make a note of it.
Very important. I know if [my favorite publisher] published it, it will be a great read!
I notice the publisher if the book is badly edited. Otherwise it's not very important, though I actually check the publisher out just for curiosity. (write-in)
It doesn't factor into my purchasing decisions. (write-in)
Somewhat important - knowing the publisher will give me a vague idea of what the book will be like. It's not generally make or break if I'm deciding what to read, but it can tip the balance one way or another. (write-in)
only if it is a part of a series i'm collecting (write-in)
Wait, WHY would people care who the publisher of a book is? IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!!!!!!!!!!! (at least not to me) (write-in)
it can make a whole lot of difference if it is a translation (write-in)
I always check the publisher, but I base my reading decisions on other criteria, such as recommendations. (write-in)
It's only important when the book has been published by several different publishing houses. Some I love for their lay-outing, so that will influence my choice. (write-in)
I will favor Baen, Random House, and other publishers who do not participate in Apple's Racketeering Model. (write-in)
never ! (write-in)
depends-certain publisher are known for a genre. But most of my authors jump publishers (write-in)
I avoid self-publishing houses, but otherwise the subject, author, and personal recommendations are most important. (write-in)
Very important. I don't support mess. (write-in)
I think it only matters if someone needs to know, or you are doing a work cited. (write-in)
I prefer certain publishers over others when it comes to classics (write-in)
Some publishers are more reliable, carry better made or attractive books and reputable writers. I also find that some publishers are work harder for the best translations, and in classics. I like Scribner, Penguin, and Oxford. However, I don't fully determine my book buying by publishing house, it is only a factor. (write-in)
It matters for eBooks because the quality range is so huge. (write-in)
I've never even noticed. (write-in)
I only check when the book is in the genre I would write, that way I would have a better notion of where to turn to when I look for publishing. (write-in)
I usually don't mind the publisher, but i hate it when a certain publisher has a more attractive book cover than the one i bought first!!..other than that i care more about the book and author itself (write-in)
While selecting a translated book it matters..Sometimes translators differ with publishers and so their translation.. better read the review to find these kind of discrepancies.. (write-in)
Very important, but only because I work in the business. Before then, publishers didn't mean anything to me. (write-in)
If i dont see anything this first time, i go back and look at the publisher of books ive liked in the past. (write-in)
Avoid publishers in general, choose the most obscure editions and especially avoid HarperCollins, Puffin, Random House, Bloomsbury etc. Self and indie publishers FTW. Definitely worth noting though. (write-in)
It only matters to me when buying a physical book (exception: ebooks being free or not). When finishing out a series, I want them all to match. And for classics, I'm almost always drawn to Barnes&Noble. They're the cheapest at my favorite used bookstore. (write-in)
For print books, the publisher doesn't matter to me at all, but for e-books it does, because I only buy DRM-free, (write-in)
I check the publisher because I know which houses publish genres I have absolutely no interest in reading. Other than that, I'm open to any publisher that has produced competently edited books in the past in the wide variety of genres I *do* want to read. (write-in)
Poll added by: Patrick
create a poll
create a poll