Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Last Sherlock Holmes Story” as Want to Read:
The Last Sherlock Holmes Story
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Last Sherlock Holmes Story

4.06 of 5 stars 4.06  ·  rating details  ·  3,269 ratings  ·  116 reviews
For fifty years after Dr Watson's death, a packet of papers, written by the doctor himself, lay hidden in a locked box. The papers contained an extraordinary report of the case of Jack the Ripper and the horrible murders in the East End of London in 1888. The detective, of course, was the great Sherlock Holmes - but why was the report kept hidden for so long? This is the s ...more
Paperback, 72 pages
Published 1995 by Oxford Uinversity Press (first published January 1st 1978)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Last Sherlock Holmes Story, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Last Sherlock Holmes Story

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Oh my god. Literally. Just don't read this book. That's all I can say. Promise me? PROMISE? Don't do it. It'll ruin you for at least a whole day with rage and an intense feeling that you just wasted two hours of your life that you can't get back. But you know, if you want someone to take Holmes and mostly destroy him as a character then yeah, go for it. This is JUST the book for you. Otherwise, STAY AWAY.
Amy Sturgis
I understand why this Sherlock Holmes-meets-Jack the Ripper novel is controversial among (even hated by) some Holmes fans who are wed to one interpretation of the detective, but I found it to be fascinating and very well rooted in the canonical Holmesian texts. Its sophisticated (and darkly Gothic) psychological look not only at Holmes (whom I found to be poignantly redeemed at the end, contrary to what I'd expected from other reviews) but also at the wonderful Dr. Watson kept me very interested ...more
Dibdin is a decent writer, and I found the writing itself rather enjoyable. That's the upside. But I absolutely detested this particular book because of the story and the premise. When I finished it, I wanted to throw it across the room, stomp on it, and then tear it into little pieces. I settled for fobbing it off to a used bookstore, where hopefully it languishes unread, instead of infecting the psyche of some other poor sod...
I do not consider myself a Sherlock Holmes purest, but I confess that a certain revelation in the story, when I came to it, did give me a few minutes of angst. I spent more than a few minutes thinking about whether I could accept the story line and keep reading. I admit, my first reaction was “No, this is not my Sherlock Holmes!” It has happened to me before.

I was enjoying the writing style. I thought Mr. Dibdin had caught the flavor Holmes and Watson very well. Everything Author Conan Doyle wa
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
If you're a Sherlock Holmes fan, I don't think this is a book for you. This is supposed to be a Holmes story written by Dr. Watson and held back for 50 years as provided in his will. Perhaps it is a good reading novel, though you pretty much know what is going to happen part way through, but I didn't care for its portrayal of Holmes. The Holmes in this story is not "my" Holmes.
I found this book truly disturbing.
I hated, hated, hated this book.

To be perfectly fair, I was fourteen or fifteen when I found this on the shelf at the public library. I was a recently-minted Sherlock Holmes fan, and had been devouring The Original Illustrated Sherlock Holmes, so I was eager to read anything that had "Sherlock Holmes" anywhere on the cover. So this depth-plumbing horror was my very first Holmes pastiche, and probably a bit "mature" for me at that particular stage in my reading life. I consider it possible that s
Natalie Dale
When I first began reading this I thought it was a good read which stayed true to the previous works of ACD but also gave some inventive explanations and changes to give a different perspective on the infamous Sherlock Holmes. However, the twist is revealed half way through the book and, although abandoned by Watson as ridiculous at points, still does not lead to a surprise ending and appears to be very much an anti-climax after a trundling narrative in parts. Although it is still worth a read, ...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

Looking through the other reviews, I can see that either you love this book or you hate it. I'm in the first group. First, Dibdin shows you that he can capture the flavor of the old Arthur Conan Doyle stories perfectly; then, not content with merely imitating, he adds some disturbing new elements to the legend. In the afterword, he asks you to forgive him. It's heresy, he freely admits, but the heresy of the true believer. An eloquent and accurate summary!

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
An abomination of a Sherlock Holmes novel for the purists. On its own merits a weak story. Unsealed Watson papers cover Holmes' seeking to solve the Ripper murders. If this sounds lazy it's because it is.
Riju Ganguly
An extremely clever take on the whole Holmes v/s Ripper concept, with a twist-ending that will take your breath away! I know, it reads like those blurbs that we get to read on paperbacks ('The cover will show you somebody shot/the back will tell you what is the plot'!), but that is the most succint description of this book that I can produce without producing spoilers en masse! Read it, curse Michael Dibdin to the core (the guy is dead, so really can't effect any harm), and then keep thinking: w ...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Alan Brindley
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Jib Jetrsinpaisan
I wasnt quite sure what is my feeling about this book. YES! I DO LOVE HOLMES. After i finished this book, my first thought was like what the hell! Dibdin just completely destroyed my holmes.

But at the same time, i think he is kinda great writer. Considering the writing itself, i found it's quite enjoyable. Holmes met Jact the Ripper and then what? Holmes met Moriaty an then what? I just couldnt put my hands off the book ( i finished it like 2-3 hours).

It almost a good book until i read the las
Mitsuki Mizutani
1. Publisher/Level: Oxford/3
2. 06/17=200minutes
3. Seven-word summary: 1)real story 2)Jack the Ripper 3)women 4) 5)ripped up 6)clever 7)Moriarty

4.(a): "The letters E,S,C and N are Eddowes, Stride, Chapman and Nicholl, the last four women he has murdered,' Holmes said. 'The diagram shows the place where each died. 'And X, I suppose, is some unknown woman, the one that he plans to kill tonight,' I said. 'But how do you know where to put the X on your diagram?' 'Look again, Watson,' Holmes said with
Patrick Hilyer
OK, so this was a second-time read, but despite knowing the ending I enjoyed the clever way Dibdin dovetails Holmes and Watson into the grisly events in Whitechapel in 1888 – an over-used fictional conceit these days, but pretty original when the story was published in ‘78. A compelling and authentic voice that stops short of lampooning Conan Doyle’s bumbling Doctor or his enigmatic ‘consulting detective’.
I am a true and loyal fan of Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes, however, I can accept Holmes as portrayed by other writers. Some other writers, that is, but not this one. I wanted to like this book but I couldn't. Michael Dibdin was a fine writer and I was fully expecting to enjoy this book. After all, it has great subject matter...Sherlock Holmes and Jack the Ripper. It turns out I didn't enjoy anything about this book.
There is no mystery in this novel because the mystery is given away half
Every once in a while, a contemporary author feels the need to confront Sherlock Holmes. Especially if the author works in genre literature. Dibdin, a justly acclaimed mystery writer in his own right does the tradition a classic tribute in this very clever take on the Holmes legend.
An amazing idea to combine the most notorious unsolved crimes of Jack the Ripper with the most notorious crime solver, Sherlock Holmes. Made me want to research both more after finishing this book.
This was horrifying.
I feel I can say very little about The Last Sherlock Holmes story without spoiling the plot. It's clearly aimed at fans of Sherlock Holmes, but I'm not sure many fans will like it. (I gave it four stars because I feel Dibdin did a good job, rather than actually *liking* it.) It's certainly unique in my experience.

Dibdin accounts for differences in writing style and character behavior by attributing the familiar stories as fictional works by Doyle loosely based on Watson's notes of cases Holmes s
Sarà che forse sono nel pieno della mia fissa per Sherlock Holmes, per questo sono rimasta così presa da questa lettura, che oltre ad essere scritta magistralmente ha anche il pregio di sembrare fino a metà un normalissimo caso alla ACD, per poi diventare improvvisamente tutto il contrario e tenerti comunque incollata alle pagine fino alla fine.
Un finale così potrà far storcere il naso a molti, ma io l'ho trovato molto bello, specie per il dialogo tra Holmes e Watson nelle ultime pagine. L'idea
'The Last Sherlock Holmes Story' by Michael Dibdin is just one of the many Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper fictions that exist within the world of Holmesian literature, but this story is has very singular factors which separate it from other stories written.

The story exposes the reader to an entirely different perspective on Holmes that is entirely possible, given Holmes’ history and the canonical details referenced. I think the fact that it’s so possible, and so undesirable at the same t
Jamie Bernthal
The 'horrifying twist' is painfully obvious. I mean, if you can't guess it after reading the blurb or reading between the lines of any individual response to the book then you'll never make a Sherlock. And of course, I came to it all post-Robert Lee Hall so nothing struck me as revolutionary.

That said, the story is well-told. Dibdin is a little restrained at times as though afraid of developing too much of a narrative voice. But I loved his explanation for the discrepancy between the canon and h
My first introduction to Sherlock Holmes was through his 'last' case with Jack the Ripper in this very book. I was very young when I read this, and it left such an impression-- I still remember passages from the book that rings sometimes in my mind, and a particular illustration near the ending. I suppose it had to do with the fact that I was impressionable when I read this book, but it doesn't take away the influence it had.

Fans would probably revolt at the idea of Sherlock Holmes as a villain
This book started out with a strike against it as the Holmes vs The Ripper idea has pretty much reached a complete saturation point. In fact, often while reading this novel, I felt that I had read it previously only to find a new bit here or there that would have left enough impression on me to precisely remember having read this book or not.

That being said, the quoted reviews on the back cover claim the book to be "controversial", a claim with which I can readily agree. As a traditionalist, I f
Steven Espinosa
I gave this book 3 stars because it was promising. NO SPOILER here. Once the big revaluation was made I went into a tirade. If I rant here, those who have not read the book will certainly know what is going on. So suffice it to say that it was not my favorite story of Sherlock Holmes by authors other than Arthur Conan Doyle. There was also a great deal of "fluff" pages that tried to let you into the mind and feelings of Dr. Watson that were unnecessary. There is mention of Dr. Watson impending m ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Baker Street Irre...: The Last Sherlock Holmes Story ****SPOILERS**** 5 56 Dec 01, 2012 04:15PM  
  • Sherlock Holmes in America
  • The Mandala of Sherlock Holmes: The Adventures of the Great Detective in India and Tibet
  • Sherlock Holmes: The Unauthorized Biography
  • The Revenge of the Hound: A Sherlock Holmes Mystery
  • Gaslight Grimoire: Fantastic Tales of Sherlock Holmes
  • The Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: War of the Worlds
  • Sherlock Holmes vs. Dracula
  • The Whitechapel Horrors
  • The Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: The Man From Hell
  • The Mammoth Book of New Sherlock Holmes Adventures
  • My Dearest Holmes
  • Sherlock Holmes and the Red Demon
  • The Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: The Giant Rat of Sumatra
  • The Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: The Veiled Detective
  • Sherlock Holmes in Orbit
  • Shadows Over Baker Street
  • Sherlock Holmes of Baker Street: A Life of the World's First Consulting Detective
  • The Crimes of Dr. Watson
Michael Dibdin was born in 1947. He went to school in Northern Ireland, and later to Sussex University and the University of Alberta in Canada. He lived in Seattle. After completing his first novel, The Last Sherlock Holmes Story, in 1978, he spent four years in Italy teaching English at the University of Perugia. His second novel, A Rich Full Death, was published in 1986. It was followed by Ratki ...more
More about Michael Dibdin...
Ratking (Aurelio Zen, #1) Dead Lagoon (Aurelio Zen, #4) Vendetta (Aurelio Zen, #2) Cabal (Aurelio Zen, #3) Così Fan Tutti (Aurelio Zen, #5)

Share This Book