“For most of his adult life, Michael had been described as ‘strange,’ ‘weird,’ and ‘bizarre.’ Only now, after he was gone, did people realize that he was what they had in common.” —Randall Sullivan
Most of the biographical Michael Jackson media I’ve consumed in the past were interviews (in the form of books and podcasts) with people he personally knew, which meant there was always a pro-MJ bias. This is what I appreciate about Randall Sullivan’s book, as he didn’t set out to write a book defending or maligning Jackson. I’ve read some MJ books that seemed to be the product of a liberal amount of copy and paste, and Untouchable is nothing like them. This book is very well-researched, with about a hundred pages of references. Sullivan conducted a lot of interviews, read through many legal documents, etc.
I never believed Michael Jackson was guilty of child molestation (I have researched the allegations for over ten years, including reading the court transcripts). Every single one of his accusers first consulted with civil attorneys, not police, and Sullivan clearly highlights this fact. This book gives one of the best accounts of the 2005 child molestation trial I have ever read, and included details I didn’t know about before (such as Jackson angrily standing up in the middle of his accuser’s sister’s testimony). That being said, I don’t think a “guilter” would be persuaded by this book, because I felt unsatisfied with Sullivan’s account of the 1993 allegations.
Throughout the book, he doesn’t seem to have an opinion either way, but makes it very clear that he thinks the Arvizo family were a bunch of grifters. How can someone write a book on Michael Jackson, but be ambiguous about Jordan Chandler? It’s especially odd considering how much he focussed on Jordan’s life as an adult (in chapter 30), which isn’t really relevant to the issue at hand. It isn’t until the final chapter that Sullivan explicitly stated that he doesn’t believe Jackson abused children, but most people who pick up this book probably wouldn’t make it that far.
I do believe Sullivan tried to write an honest portrayal of the singer’s life, even if I didn’t agree with all of his conclusions (because I don’t think some of the people he interviewed are reliable). I feel that there are only two aspects of Jackson’s life that are up for public speculation—the allegations and his art. What he did to his face, his romantic relationships, health, paternity of his children, etc are really none of our business. I will never understand the public’s fascination with these, and it’s in these areas where I find myself questioning Sullivan’s sources.
My main criticism of this book is that it’s not really about Michael Jackson’s life, but more about the controversies and shady people who surrounded him (especially towards the latter half). I feel I learned more about Dr. Arnold Klein and Marc Schaffel than I did about Michael Jackson. The Jackson family (including Katherine) are painted as greedy and opportunistic, but it’s hard to tell what Sullivan thought about Michael. Nearly five chapters are devoted to talking about Jackson’s death (Murray, the will, estate lawyers, etc). There is a lot more focus on the last few years of Michael’s life, and the one chapter that summarizes his childhood and rise to fame rehashes old information that I doubt anyone over the age of 35 doesn’t already know about MJ. I guess Michael Jackson is the only musical genius whose 800 page biography can dismiss his artistry as an after-thought and still be widely published.
Rather than elaborating upon the peaks of his career, the book explains in vivid detail Jackson’s valleys, spending habits, financial difficulties, legal troubles (litigation, not criminal) more than anything else. This is what gives the book a “tabloid” feel, as it seems to be interested in shedding light on the most private aspects of MJ’s life. I don’t see why someone with just a casual interest in Michael Jackson, or the allegations against him, would want to read this book as they would have to sift through literally hundreds of pages to find something of interest. Nor would an obsessed fan find this book appealing, since the author doesn’t mention things like Jackson’s humanitarian work (an important topic when discussing someone who donated hundreds of millions to charity), and believes Jackson was “pre-sexual.” The oddest part is the afterword which outlines the Conrad Murray trial in arguably more detail than the chapters discussing the 2005 Jackson trial (Sullivan already spent a couple of chapters on Murray), and the “Katherine Jackson kidnapping” incident.
While I have my issues with “Untouchable,” it didn’t warrant the fan protest that Jackson’s former defence attorney Tom Mesereau denounced. I guess what speaks volumes is that after reading this book, my feelings toward Michael Jackson haven’t changed at all (but I can’t help but think less of his family). I don’t like Jackson more or less because of the book, or have any lingering questions. Shouldn’t a good book do that? Inspire some change in belief or opinion, or further inquiry?
In summary, this book lacks focus, and jumps back and forth in the timeline of Jackson’s life, and then ends with several chapters about posthumous events and controversies that don’t shed much light on the man himself. The book rambles quite a bit about uninteresting topics while overlooking aspects of Jackson’s life that the public would find interesting. I’m amazed at how Sullivan managed to make even someone like Michael Jackson seem dull, boring, and merely a supporting character in the story of his own life.