I have long been drawn to Erasmus on a number of counts. I share his aversion to contention, his abhorrence of war, his wistful skepticism with respect to that which transcends the verifiable…I relish his whimsicality and satire.
Roland H. Bainton, from the Preface
I too, am drawn to Erasmus for the reasons the author states in his preface. He was a remarkable man, a remarkable mind. As the first widely published author after the invention of the printing press, Erasmus became a celebrity scholar, the original public intellectual of the Northern Renaissance.
”No man in Europe had so many friends in high places in Church, state, and school. He was invited to take up his residence in the entourage of crowned and mitered heads, of kings and emperors, burgomasters and town councillors, cardinals and popes.”
I find Erasmus the most fascinating man of his age, greater in wit, reason, and wisdom than his famous contemporaries, Thomas More and Martin Luther. Bainton draws a comparison between Erasmus and Luther in their shared monastic experiences, which I find illustrative of this point:
”Luther entered the monastery to save his soul by good works, Erasmus to enlighten his mind by good books.”
But despite his stature among his contemporaries, despite his contributions to lasting scholarship (his dual Latin/Greek translations of The New Testament became the foundation of the Luther Bible, the Tyndale Bible, and the King James Bible), despite his remarkable (and still humorous) satire In Praise of Folly, Erasmus has been far more neglected than other great men of his era, and that largely because he attempted a wise middle course in the great conflict we call the Reformation. His non belligerence left him as no one’s hero and no one’s saint.
”Erasmus, ever the prophet of peace, pled, exhorted, and essayed the role of mediator with fruitless persistence. He drew fire from both sides in the controversies and ended his days as both the arbiter and the outlaw of Christendom.”
So it was with great excitement that I came to Roland Bainton’s book, hoping to find the scattered, fascinating facts I knew of Erasmus drawn together into a dramatic biography. Bainton had done just that with his excellent bio of Martin Luther, Here I Stand, and I expected no less here. I was left disappointed. The book is uneven and disjointed, never really jelling into a dramatic flow. It was pieced together from five, separate lectures, which perhaps explains both its disjointed feel and it tendency toward a dry, academic tone. There is definitely valuable information here on the great Erasmus, but a great biography this is not.