Traces the dramatic events surrounding the Wall Street scandal of 1905, during which a young heir to a billion-dollar company was accused of misusing funds, exposing a tangle of financial chicanery involving the period's most noted tycoons and politicians. Reprint.
Excellent history on the corruption involving the Big Three life insurance companies at the dawn of the 20th century, though Equitable is the focus of this book. Beard did a terrific job of organizing her information into shorter chapters that helped me stay on track (no simple feat, with all of the blind trusts, circuitous business transactions, and tangled affiliations amongst the MANY players). Perhaps the best move, Beard shifts gears about midway to write about the ball that touched off the firestorm - the recklessly expensive fluff of these parties to show off one's financial and social power was mind-boggling, and also hilarious at times. Two incidents, one involving imported butterflies and the other decorative swans, had me laughing out loud at the humbling of the hosts. The Gilded Age really was off the charts - in both the social scene and the financial dealings. This book also reads as very contemporary, of course - this scandal wouldn't look dated at all on the front page of any newspaper today. Kudos to Ms. Beard for her excellent research and writing here.
When I picked this book for book club, I was really excited about it--what a great way to talk about past and present! And it started off really good--all the juicy details of the power people at the turn of the last century. And then it just sorta fizzled. I think part of my issue is I just don't know that much about economics and buisness. Part of me wishes the Planet Money team could just explain the Equitable Life Insurance thing. But it's still fascinating and well written. I just felt like some stuff went over my head. And the similiarities between today and then are pretty amazing. Recommended, but only if you are already a fan of Wall Street scandals
An eye-opener when it comes to once-wealthy moguls. Though James Hyde pillaged his father's hard-won money via a big insurance agency at the turn of the 20th century, Hyde's sad story could as easily be written today. While the craving for more and a hankering after enormous purchases of items that were "hot" at the time, the materialism and obsessions are the same today. Hyde panted and salivated after carriages and other lesser modes of transport, while within a handful of years those items were virtually obsolete. The wealthy contemporaries of current lust-ers for MORE are the same concerning cars and jewels, the latter of which will at least increase in value. Or theoretically.
Pretty dry and objective. Most of the research was taken from newspapers and court records. The book would have been improved with sources such as personal letters.
A story of a man who, at the age of 23 in the year 1899, inherited a majority of shares in a mammoth Equitable Life Insurance Society but was much more interested in being a socialite, housing grandiose balls, and admiring French art. It only took several years for his business empire to fall apart in a scandal oddly similar to the demise of Drexel Burnham Lambert or Enron decades later. And Patricia Beard knows how to tell a story of glamour and greed at the beginning of the twentieth century.
From the lens and perspective of an amateur historian the writing was too detailed on topics that were either not important or became confusing with a conflicting narrative among too many 'players'- would not recommend
I enjoyed this book. It gave me a window into a different time (well, a few different eras). The details were things I never knew from history books (like the carriage racing hobby some rich gentlemen had, as an example). The author did a great job of fleshing in what could be (and sometimes was, a bit) boring financial details with really interesting color about people's social hobbies, looks, habbits, and so on, mostly of the very wealthy and of industry leaders from the early 1900s. Extremely well researched. I've never read a book like this before, don't know that I will again, but I liked it!