✰ 3.25 stars ✰
“Prophecies are not about accidents, or random caprices of the gods.
They are about what you will do, in defiance of everything you thought you knew about yourself.”
There comes a moment in every reader's life that they begin a novel and can't quite understand what exactly it is that they're reading. When they fail to figure it out on their own, they turn to our lifeline Google to better explain that which the writing has been unable to do so a few chapters in.
That moment has finally arrived for me. 🙃
“I suppose only a few men are ever really granted a vision of their fate. We all may have our fortune told, or we may guess it on our own.”
And after a brief search on the Internet, I returned to Pyrrhus' journey with a slightly better understanding of what was to come. Published in 1998, An Arrow's Flight is Mark Merlis' literary fiction of the gay retelling of the loosely inspired Sophocles' story of Philoctetes and Pyrrhus, or Neoptolemus that has been recounted for almost three millennia. Set during the days cataclysmic Trojan war, it is a unique if not ambitious blend of modernity with mythology - of tragedy, identifying with identity. It weaves the tale of twenty-one year, Pyrrhus, son of the fallen Achilles, from the days of which he listlessly makes his way through New York as a self-employed hustler - a rent boy who sold his body, ironically to pay off the rent, and then simply because he was bored ('I'm not doing anything wrong')- he suddenly finds himself on a quest meant to find his purpose, to realize that maybe he already recognized a part of him, he for so long scorned and chose to deny. 😟
For when he embarks on what he initially thought when his late father's proverbial adviser arrives regaling him with the idea of setting sail to find himself, he soon finds that he has been beguiled into yet another mission - believing that his destiny was more than just being used for someone else's pleasure. A mission that Odysseus and co feel that as already an existing whore he'll have no qualms of servicing himself for political means - 'this isn’t a private affair. It is an affair of state, if you will. And a rather protracted one' - winning the affections of the banished and deliberately stranded Philoctetes - owner of a magical bow - that Oracle portends that whoever has it in their possession will turn the tide of war in their favor. 💔💔 Amidst those who are also eager to win his favor, and also struggling to find himself as he argues with himself to either charm Philoctetes with his own charm, only for him to slowly discover that the disillusion of himself may have more faults in the cracks than he may have realized.
“He couldn’t be two people. If one of them was going to have a future, the other one would have to die.”
It took me a while to adapt to the writing style; but once I understood the mission, it was easy to get swept away - wondering what fate awaited all those involved. Can you sympathize with a character like Pyrrhus, beautiful and empty, a vessel for your dreams - who did not carry the weight of his father's expectations on his shoulders, but wished to prove his own? Who loftily took in stride his overzealous sexual endeavors, not realizing how it would literally come back in his face, when those who preyed upon his existing nature to make him of use for their own political gain? A honeytrap, for a lack of a more suitable if not unpleasant term - who had no past worth recalling and no destiny - other than making a name for himself. 😢 And even then, his innocence was robbed of him, when he was compelled to act in a service unbecoming of his nature, and yet, what others felt he was only capable of.
I did - at times. From his roommate days with Leucon, a less than dazzling counterpart to Pyrrhus' beauty, you could tell that it was gearing up to be a tragedy, if not a travesty, in which he lost the chance to speak up on his own behalf. The odds were never in his favor, and that hurt to know. Even with the unnecessary chorus of interruptions from the omniscient chorus, it was disheartening how 'the casting call was for a whore, and one had shown up just in time. History turned on him; the world was waiting.' I did not pity him, but I sympathized with him.
He was someone who could not discern the difference between care or love - empathy or compassion - or simply seeing that he was worth something more than being a cheap rent for hire. 'God, you poor little shit. If you don’t even care what you feel, who the fuck will.' 🫂 Through his trials and ordeals of trying to understand the difference between a meaningful relationship or meaningless sex was a catalyst that drove him to care for hurting Phioctetes - that he did not want to falsify his feelings for him for the sake of beguiling him. It's the subtlety in which the author slowly led to that final breakdown - where its fight or flight - that determined what his destiny was.
“We don’t seem to have a great deal of control over events. You were … my only arrow. Now we’ve shot it.”
It was his courtship of Philoctetes or rather the attempt to woo him in their favor that stirs his heart to better understand the kind of person he wants to be. 'He was a queer, he got hurt, Odysseus got rid of him. / A bit oversimplified, but: in essence., Philoctetes was an older man who has lived the scene longer than he has, witnessed the aftermaths of affections and withstand the nature of those who seek him for their own pleasures, without really knowing him. ❤️🩹❤️🩹 But, they developed a kinship between them not based on mutual pleasure, but of understanding and seeking out warmth and solace in their presence - 'as if he believed that there was a hero inside there, one who would sooner or later manifest himself.' 😔
There is some twisted irony in the symbolic way both sides were desperate to claim the bow for themselves - covet something he held close, despite its purpose, lacking. To get deeper into that would almost be like saying we envy those who live life as they feel best. To be most comfortable with our truest nature and spite those who have to live a life of shadows because of the discrimination of moral ideas. 😟 For the very snake bite - a tiny wound that people couldn't even see that cost him to be cast asunder was described as almost an affliction that was catching - a grievance that made him an untouchable. That very comparison to that of how being gay is a stigma was a painful contrast that resonated with me deeply. 🤧
Or perhaps, I'm just reaching. 😔
“Perhaps this was all written somewhere. But all Destiny’s scribblings, if compiled into one unimaginable volume, would not yield a message.
She has no point to make. Corythus was innocent. Even the snake was innocent. Philoctetes innocently misstepped, the snake innocently bit.”
It's funny. Until the very end, there really was no indication of what time period the story was taking place in; if you had told me it was the 90s, I would not have argued with that. But, it was not until, the author describes the green walls of the hospital room - family members arriving in silence and solitude to grieve for the sick, did I realize that Pyrrhus' coming-of-age adventure was actually set in the '70s - the era of clandestine gay liberation. 🥺 'We had a long time. I don’t know, it seems like a minute.' It was a quiet portrayal of the sinking feeling of the despair that the 80s would bring in - an aching sadness of time lost for love unfairly and tragically lost too soon...
Perrhaps, now knowing what I was getting myself into, I just might appreciate the little details I overlooked upon a reread. The writing definitely is a strange contrast of parallels of the events of the Trojan War, heralding for Pyrrhus to act fast or forever lose face in front of the gods and his father's legacy. It builds on the suspense of wondering which side the tide of fate would favor, which never allowed me to feel bored. There is a certain tacit humor to the comments that arise, speculating on the influence Pyrrhus' persona has had on others - an influence that is allowing others to spread their own wings and fly. There is a certain novelty to this - like I mentioned earlier, it was an ambitious endeavor. 👍🏻👍🏻 Ambitious in how it exemplified the presence of homosexuality in the form of a Trojan story - the idea that Lemnos, the very island Philoctetes was sentenced to live out the rest of his years - simply for being different than the rest of his crew, and destined to carry the stigma of a mark that set him apart - was a bit of a gay refuge, where no one was questioned for their beliefs, principles, or affections was an interesting sentiment. Almost as if Pyrrhus had been heading towards the light of Lemnos all along... 🙏🏻🙏🏻
It it is an ode of finding yourself and embracing your identity and not hiding behind a false image and being content with that feeling - a struggle that Pyrrhus did not realize he was grappling with - weary of having to explain himself, until he set out for his own quest to find his true calling. The inclusion of the Greek narrative made for a rather interesting take - a candid, if not bittersweet portrayal imbued with the longing of self-acceptance and self-worth, but also one that showed how there were those who stayed in the shadows for fear of being smited by the gods - a predominant feeling that still sadly rings true to those who still are too afraid to be true to themselves. 🏹