“India Calling” is a book about the modernizing India of the 2000’s from an interesting perspective: that of a second-generation Indian (Anand Giridharadas) with immigrant parents. Sometimes derisively known as “ABCDs” (American-Born Confused Desis), their knowledge of their parent’s homeland is limited to infrequent visits during school vacations and the aspects of Indian culture that were retained by the parents, primarily language, religion and food. I have a similar, though not exactly the same, experience, with my school years (2nd to 9th grade) spent outside India. My exposure to Kerala and Malayalam was limited to the shared experiences with my parents. But I went to an Indian school which had its syllabus dictated from Delhi, so like other children there, we had a better understanding of India than I would suppose an American-born citizen of Indian origin would have. And also since I returned to India as a teenager and remained there for a decade, much of Indian culture seeped into me, though a few foreign elements would remain.
But back to Anand. He spent most of his childhood and college years in the United States and England, and then moved to Mumbai as a consultant for McKinsey. During this time, he started writing pieces about India and became a full-fledged writer. This is his first book and details many of his experiences and his impressions of the new India. It covers a lot of ground from the Reliance empire of the Ambanis to the Maoist threat facing the country. It uses the detailed profile of Ravindra, a young man who is able to make use of new opportunities to become the most respected man in town. We also learn of the new found confidence in Indian-ness. Anand also takes a look at changing social and sexual norms and how the older generation feels threatened.
There is much to like about the book. Anand is an excellent writer and the book is a beautiful piece of work. Anand also does not hesitate to bring in discussions of the divisive elements of caste and religion into the book. I don’t think an Indian-born writer would have done the same. Most Indians have a big blind spot when it comes to caste and how it affects society. When Anand talks about the question of whether an Indian Hindu would rather have cocaine than marry a Muslim, it strikes the target perfectly. There is so much pressure to conform to social norms that bigotry and oppression is normal in Indian society, even today. Anand does not intend this to suggest the superiority of the West, as he explains that several generations ago, Western societies too had similar standards – slavery, few rights for women and so on. Also, while Anand draws some comfort in the friendliness of Indian society, he is frustrated by the lack of empathy that seems at odds with the expressed values of the culture.
The book does have some weaknesses. One, I venture to say, is that the book is written too beautifully and the descriptions too flowery and insightful for a person of Anand’s limited years and experience. There is something that doesn’t quite feel real and it took me some time to understand it. What Anand tried to do in this book is not only explain the new India, but also try to analyze the minds of Indians. He tries to imagine what Indians must have thought in the past (before economic reforms took place) and what they think now. It is a risky exercise because quite honestly, you cannot know what someone is thinking. You can look at their actions, you can listen to what they say, you can even ask them what they are thinking. But ultimately you are guessing. And so when Anand writes an eloquent paragraph about Indian culture and why something is happening, he is making a hypothesis, an educated one, but still only a guess. And when that guess is wrong, you suddenly see the weakness in Anand’s approach.
Take for example, Anand’s amazing assertion of no sexuality in past Indian movies. Only someone who has zero knowledge of the content of mainstream Bollywood movies (even from the 1960s) would even suggest that. It is clear that Anand never watched (or doesn’t remember) older Indian movies with his parents or when he came to India. Because he gets this point wrong, a significant part of his writing about the changing romantic scene in India strikes one as silly. I remember reading front-page stories in India Today and the Illustrated Weekly in the early 1990s saying essentially the same thing that Anand writes, and I bet similar stories were written in the 1980s and even before. Urbanization has always changed the conventional family and Indian urbanization is not a new phenomenon – it has simply accelerated in the last decade.
The same mistake happens with the examples used by Anand, whether it is Ravindra or Mukesh Ambani. There has always been the aggressive, non-gentile, entrepreneurial personality in India and it has not been limited to the bania class. Almost everyone in India was and is hustling, trying to make a few extra bucks, starting a business and so on. But India was starting from a lower economic base, she shackled herself with socialist economic constraints, paid little attention to fundamental needs (primary education, health, social reform) and failed to address rampant, endemic corruption. In fact, in such a country, the people who rise to the top tend to be the corrupt, cheating hustlers, unlike a developed country where if you have one good skill, you can try to capitalize on that without worrying too much about government and mafia interference.
Also, there were several important holes. There was very little about Eastern India or South India, despite the fact that Bangalore is the hub of the technology revolution. Cultural differences between different parts of the country were missing. Anand seems to have taken a billion people and stuffed them into one pigeon-hole. Property rights, dowry, politics, systemic corruption, infrastructure, pollution, education, etc. all either unaddressed or given a cursory glance.
I guess the last few paragraphs may have given a bad impression of the book. But as I said, I liked it. It offers a great view into India and provides good insights. Just be clear that it is not complete (and I think the author will probably say that it cannot be complete) and the analysis not always right, especially when it comes to psychoanalysis.