My edition of “The World of King Arthur” by Christopher Snyder published by Thames & Hudson looks much more like a coffee table book than something that calls for a full-on review. It’s replete with illustrations and paintings, including the prerequisite works of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood who seemed to have an inordinate obsession with anything related to Arthuriana.
As a layman’s introduction to the history of Arthur as a cultural, literary, and (possibly) historical figure, this book is hard to beat. All the illustrations might lead you to think that it was mostly fluff, but it contains a lot of really good scholarship, including the archeological evidence for an “Arthur-like figure,” Arthur’s increasingly important role in medieval literature as time went on, the introduction of new characters into the Arthurian oeuvre, and storytellers who wrote about Arthur who used him to discuss the themes that were resonant in their own time. Snyder even looks at the more contemporary incarnations of the Arthur stories as they appear in the operas of Richard Wagner, books like White’s “The Once and Future King,” Powys’ “The Glastonbury Romance,” and film.
I didn’t realize that a lot of the archeological research in this area has actually been done only in the last several decades. One of the biggest contributors to this area in particular was Leslie Alcock whose “Arthur’s Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367-634” I recently completely and will be reviewing soon. A sizeable part of the book is dedicated to looking at the major archaeological sites, including Tintagel, Cadbury, and Glastonbury Abbey. Snyder also gives a brief review of the post-Roman occupation of Britain, including the Celts, Jutes, Picts, and Saxons. Despite the extensive field research, there is actually no definitive evidence that anyone like Arthur actually existed. There is, however, a preponderance of evidence whose weight does build a good case, and an especially convincing one for those carried away by the romance of the stories themselves.
If you’re unfamiliar with the development the Arthurian legends, you could be forgiven for naively thinking that they emerged fully formed, with all their characters in situ – Perceval, Galahad, Lancelot, Merlin, et cetera. But many of the major figures were introduced piecemeal over long periods of time. One of the tasks Snyder performs best is describing how the canonical stories developed, from the very earliest mentions in the Welsh chronicles to Geoffrey of Monmouth to the 12th century Norman poet Wace, to Malory and so on.
I would imagine that for the serious student of the Arthur legends this book presents precious little in the way of new material to be learned. However for a rank neophyte like myself who just wanted something to supplement my own passing interests, this more than serves its purpose. While it doesn’t look like much in the way of a reference book, I hope to hang on to it for exactly that purpose, since it addresses pretty much every question about Arthur that I had as I read about him in other places without ever needing to sacrifice its readability.