So what's up with the highlander on the cover? Hero is an English Border Lord and heroine is also English...even the one Scottish guy is a lowlander. Methinks this is slightly deceiving..
Anywho. The story. Three years earlier, Bridget basically married our hero, Curan, and only "celebrating" the marriage remains. For all intents and purposes, she is a bride, but not yet a wife. Curan had to go off and do his knightly thing with the king and has been waiting to get back to make his wife permanently his. However, Bridget suddenly gets a letter from her father stating that she is now arranged to marry some Lord at court and all that previous marriage stuff is irrelevant. He commands her to come to London. Bridget, wanting to be a dutiful daughter, agrees and packs her things. Then, Curan shows up and is none too happy that Bridget and her family have broken their promise to him. He insists she come with him so they can celebrate their marriage.
Now this is where it gets dicey. Initially, I'd say that Bridget is just stupid and makes plans to escape this man that she is wildly attracted to and kind of wants to stay married to. She only insists that she wants to be dutiful to her father and if that means marrying an old, decrepit guy at court even though she doesn't want to, so be it. And that excuse for me, doesn't hold up for long...because Bridget knows this is out of character for her father and that she also owes obedience to her husband. But she starts thinking a bit smarter. The man who has arranged this marriage, Chanellor Wriothelsy (or something like that spelling) is awfully powerful and if Bridget goes against the wishes of the Chancellor, now that the king is nearing the end of his reign, Curan stands to lose everything he's worked hard to achieve. And the more she cares about him, the less she wants that. So, her excuse very quickly turns into having to escape in order to protect an innocent man (and one she's falling in love with). She kind of found herself between a rock and hard place, so I could understand this dilemma.
The relationship between Bridget and Curan was okay. They definitely had quite a lot of sexual chemistry and often times this reads a bit more like erotica than straight up historical romance. No doubt, some of their scenes are steamy. And the whole thing with the courtesan "demonstrating" how to please a man, while sexy, felt a bit contrived...like maybe looking for a way to hook the reader (which it does). It also gave a very convincing excuse for Bridget's not being a sexually inhibited - she's quite bold and confident because of her experience watching the courtesan. Where this fell short for me was with Bridget and Curan's emotional relationship. It didn't really FEEL like these two were in love and Curan's frequent emotional shut downs where he becomes cold and unfeeling contributed to this because he never softened even for her. I didn't think he loved her until she found the letters and he revealed he'd loved her all along. I doubted. I couldn't feel the emotional connection here.
So, as a result, this ended up being a mediocre historical romance for me. I liked it, but I didn't love it. I didn't have to slog through it or force myself to keep reading, but I wasn't eagerly turning pages to find out what happened. I definitely liked the steam factor, but was hoping for the emotional punch to go with it. I'll probably continue reading this series for now.
Also - for those with infidelity issues - Curan does appear to have been unfaithful while "married" to Bridget, though it's not 100% certain. He monologues about thinking of her when "taking his leisure" (which could be masturbation, but I doubt that) and he had a mistress, Justina, who is in this book, but the timeline of their relationship isn't clear. It could have been more than 3 years earlier, but I didn't get that impression. This of course is all revealed before Curan claims to have loved the heroine all along, so I didn't think anything of it at the time, since I didn't think he loved her at all. In retrospect, I think he was probably unfaithful while he loved her. But I try to consider this in historical context as well...YMMV there.