Kind of a strange little edition/reprint with the spine printed upside down/backwards (also on the dust jacket). Cover art is a little blurry, as are the illustrations throughout--which is really too bad as this edition doesn't do the artwork justice the way it's rendered. I do so wish the publisher would have chosen a different, better illustration than the "Ribwort Plantain" one for the cover as, for one (and this may just be a personal idiosyncratic gripe) I happen to be deathly afraid of snails, but regardless, there are far better illustrations in this book which would be much better suited to the cover.
I love all of the Flower Fairies books, but specific edition aside, this definitely isn't my favorite in the series. Rather than following the formula of the fairies teaching about/introducing the corresponding plant to the reader by describing themselves, there are a few sections in (or flowers for) which the text/poem is entirely based on dialogue between the fairies and some this-worldly creature (the aforementioned "Ribwort Plantain" among them--after reading this I know almost nothing about ribwort plantain other than that snails apparently love it and I should therefore avoid it at all costs)--which does less to directly inform the reader (of any age) about the plant in question, and some of these (e.g., Red Clover) seem rather low-effort on Miss Barker's part. Perhaps she ran out of steam a bit regarding the poetry.
The unnecessary, appended "Author's Note", too, is irksomely redundant (C.M.B insults--in my view--her little readers a bit by feeling the need to explicitly explain that the fairies in the books are "pretend" and "not real" but that it is "nice to pretend about fairies" but that the flowers and facts about them are "true"/"real ones". Come on, now! Really?! Ugh. These are things that every child over a certain age intuitively knows, and that any child under that certain age does not need to "know" or have spelled out to them) and adds little to nothing of value to the book as a whole, except mentioning a few of her sources.
Any of the Flower Fairies books (at least the ones I've had the privilege of reading, thus far) are timeless childhood classics for all ages and highly recommended; however, when it comes to overall quality, while the illustrations (if you can find a version with them rendered correctly, w/no blurriness!) remain top-notch, this entry in the series (Flower Fairies of the Wayside) is of discernibly lower quality, just isn't up to or quite on par with the impeccable standard set by the much earlier seasonal ones (or the seasons quartet, for that matter, including the posthumously published of the Winter book), nor is it Miss Barker at her best. Unsurprising perhaps given that Wayside was originally published over twenty years after the germinal three seasonal books, but just something to bear in mind.