The authors present some extremely useful ideas for how to work with students who are very comfortable using current technologies. Their criticism of the educational system's over-reliance on large-scale standardized testing is spot-on, and I agree with them that we need to find ways to move away from this outmoded form of evaluation, towards a system which engages creativity and critical thinking. However, I take issue with the authors' characterization of people as fitting into essentially two molds: digital and non-digital. These two categories miss the majority of people who fall somewhere on a spectrum in terms of ability to use and try new technologies. Reading this book myself, I felt that I was neither a part of its intended audience (way too young, and much too comfortable with computers and the internet), nor was I a member of the "digital generation" as they defined it (I love to read paper books, for instance, and more broadly I have interests outside of the computer and the internet). Yet I exist, as a student, teacher, and technology-user.
Additionally, I think the authors have a poor sense of history, as their book seems to be contending that now the ONLY time in history we have seen this level of change between what two generations experienced as children. I would be willing to bet that teachers who grew up in the 1920's experienced some level of disconnect with their students in the 40's and 50's who were growing up in the shadow of WWII and the Cold War. Similarly, I would guess that teachers who grew up in the 1940's and 50's experienced some level of disconnect with their students in the 60's and 70's who grew up in an era of extreme civil rights change and unrest.
I think that to make sure we readers feel their points about technology are crucially important, the authors have overstated and presented a biased view of the effects of technology now and throughout history. There is also NO evidence that the authors actually communicated with anyone under the age of 30 in researching their points. Characterizations about young people are made mostly in sentences that start "In talking to teachers of young people...". This is a major omission from what is presented as a book ABOUT young people and their habits and view. These deficiencies are a shame because the points the book does make about the current state of education and an over-reliance on testing are very good and very timely. I would like to see a more academically-researched version of this text (the current edition relies heavily on citations from non-academic sources, and from the authors' own previous work) which does not use hyperbole or historical exaggeration to make its point, but rather presents a balanced view of the role of technology in the lives of today's young and not-so-young people. As is, I cannot recommend this text as an accurate picture of how people under 30 engage with technology, despite its good points.