I'm still trying to figure what the title of the novel, ‘Eyes of a Child’ had to do with how the story plays out, written by Richard North Patterson. The character Elena, the child, witnesses and experiences horrible things, but her age - 6 years old - has most of the adults making pretzels out of themselves to contain her experiences and shape her life into normalcy. She primarily is either given a chapter or two showing us bad dreams about a dog, or she is living a normal life while the adults wonder why she is a bit sad. Until all is revealed at the end the reader can only suspect what happened to her, but while she is definitely important to everyone's motivation, Elena's eyes are never part of the plot. I think 'Love is Blinding', maybe or 'Love Hurts' would be more appropriate. The adults were also children with momentous childhoods, but only Teresa (Terri) Peralta's eyes as a child saw things which marked her psychologically. This affected her choices as an adult, but not irreparably or destructively. Terri ended up being a lawyer and a good mother. Her only problem is her choice of husband, which she decides to fix by getting a divorce.
Everything goes horribly wrong when Richie, the husband, is murdered.
Besides the inappropriate title, the book is lifeless for the first 100 pages, killed by too much endless conversation between Richie and Terri. The reader is beaten over the head with Richie's character flaws and selfishness. While it is obvious he is an asshole, he is a remarkably normal ex-husband-to-be kind of asshole towards Terri. He uses Elena for blackmail and vengeance in the usual thousand-cuts manner of a spouse on his way out the door of his marriage, but unfortunately for the reader, it is described too much in too many pages. There is also way too much repetitious spelled-out agonizing by the lovers Terri and lawyer Christopher Paget while they are trying to BE lovers during Terri's separation from Richie. I found myself doubting a love could really develop between a couple so full of resentful emotions and fears.
Once past the first 100 or so pages though, and laying aside the question about how Chris and Terri fell deeply in love despite the severe pressures successfully created by Richie, the novel revs up into a decent legal thriller as advertised. There are twists and turns, with true noir surprises leading to everybody doubting each other. Eventually, everyone is suspecting each other of Richie's murder, yet in court plausible lies must be served up to a skeptical judge and jury. Meanwhile, Elena appears to have been sexually abused, but by who? The evidence seems to point at Carlo, Chris's son. This new suspicion fractures all relationships almost beyond endurance.
I found the trial to be an interesting dissection of what happens when smart and self-serving individuals collide with genuine trouble, especially when everyone is playing for high stakes and protecting peripheral secrets. How most of the characters chose to 'shape the narrative' fascinated me. However, while the psychology behind the action makes this a book worthy of reading as it rings true to life (except for Chris and Terri falling in love in the first place) as does much of the divorce maneuvering, the incredibly awful first 100 pages setting up the thrills and chills really maims the book for me. It was like listening to girl teenagers on a bus talking about what to wear to a birthday party for an hour, agonizing and analyzing. It really needed cutting down, in my opinion.