John James Todd is born in Scotland in 1899, and The New Confessions follows his life from childhood to a boarding school, to the Great War, to his work in silent film in Germany, to the Second World War, to America up to the 1970s. Todd's life's work is to adapt Rousseau's Confessions into film. In some ways, this novel can be introduced to prospective readers as a Forrest Gump story--history from the point of view of one man's life. But what makes this novel work is not the sweep of history but rather the convincing way in which Boyd invests his hero with desires, drives, dreams, enemies, loves and lovers, flaws and impulsiveness, and heartbreak.
The most obvious complaint one might make about this novel is that Boyd has written it three times. Any Human Heart, published in 2002, and Sweet Caress, published in 2015, both follow the template established here in 1988. Of the three, Any Human Heart is my favorite, perhaps because I read it first but I suspect that I'd still like it best if I re-read next week. Having said that, many of its transitions and unique scenes seem obviously copied from this one, including a moment of voyeurism, being a prisoner of war, the contrived "gotcha" divorce, going to America only to flee prosecution. Although Sweet Caress comes last, I like Amory Clay most of the three heroes.
There are many things that are remarkable about these novels, but I'd like to highlight how successfully Boyd captures midlife and decline. The most interesting part of The New Confessions is Todd's life after he turns 35. So much of our culture obsesses with coming-of-age and early struggles. Even middle age is usually only of interest if it is tied to a midlife crisis. It's nice to see a novel push through that moment to doubt, heartbreak, disappointment, a second act, and more.
While reading New Confessions, I began to think about Boyd's career. So far as I can tell, he's had a great career. He has had several of his novels adapted for film and TV--two even star Hayley Atwell. And yet, no one I know seems to have read him--I can't even find mention of him on Marginal Revolution, which usually has a few words on everyone. I am surprised how often I look at his books on Goodreads and see no one in my community has read them. Perhaps these are not the places to gauge popularity or relevance, but I usually find them useful indicators. I couldn't find The New Confessions at my library and had to order it through inter-library loan. I have read several interviews with Boyd, and a few theories often occur to me about his enduring appeal and its absence. First, he seems like a writer born into the wrong era. His novels are literary, but they are mostly set in the past, perhaps because the past is a more welcome home for his realistic approach than our postmodern era. I also suspect that Freud's psychology works for novels and it's more convincing when set in the past. Therefore, because a lot of Boyd's work is society, id, sex, and death, these books are set in the past but appeal less to a post-Freudian era. It seems possible to me that several of his novels are excellent in spite of somehow being irrelevant to the zeitgeist, but I'm not even sure I have a word to describe novelists who might fit into such a category. If no other word is taken, how about "Boydian?"
One of my favorite things about these books is the way they take so many twists and turns into one relationship or country and out of it. I sometimes read Boyd's novels, particularly the three that follow an entire life, and think about what might be concluded. It occurs to me that accolades count for little, moments of personal courage count for a lot, setbacks are underrated (for obvious reasons), and that sex and love are more important than we realize, even if neither is as enduringly fascinating as we might prefer.
I expect that Boyd will prove to be one of those authors whose entire body of work I will read, even if his best works don't endure long after his life (or mine). Regardless, this one is a winner.