What do you think?
Rate this book
Anteros #3
Das Reich der Finsternis
Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso
Paperback
First published January 1, 1995
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
October 30, 2016
A great adventure told in a classical yet refreshing way. I love the Far kingdoms series. Despite that it has been about 15 years since I read book 2, the events of the first two books were still imprinted on my mind- a testament to how good they are.
One of the things I like about the series is how each one is a self-contained story. You could technically read them in any order. One of the things that put me off fantasy books a long time ago is how they tend to have to go for many volumes more than they need to; although the far kingdoms series is 4 books long it doesn't give the impression of being dragged out.
Kingdoms of the Night isn't so much different to the original book in the series, but although the story isn't particularly new, the charm of it, I think, is the adventure. Every chapter has some new danger; some creature or demon trying to pluck sailors to a watery death. A new location full of mystery and lurking threats. It's a classic boy's adventure. I really got caught up in that, and I think that's where the story's simple charm lay. It's good escapism, and although (outside of A song of Ice & fire) I've long ago been put-off fantasy, I enjoyed this enough to have already bought book 4 which is queued up to read.
There were a few things I'd nit-pick though; None of the bad-guys seem to be particularly threatening- except the demon king who really only appears late in the story. I think more could've been made of Amalric's son. Many of the lesser characters seemed that they weren't that well fleshed-out and were perhaps generic archetypes. That said, it fits in with the 'boys own adventure' type tale. A few phrases also bothered me; early in the book they are sneaking up a graveled 'drive' to a mansion. A driveway to me is a modern thing, if it said path I wouldn't have flinched. Also Amalric's journal often read 'Janela and me' as opposed to 'Janela and I' but that can be passed off as the character's voice rather than author's style. And lastly arrows were often 'fired' but of course arrows are 'shot' or 'loosed' rather than fired being as there is no fire involved.
A great, fun book. It's not too deep or particularly thought-provoking, but it's a great adventure well told.
One of the things I like about the series is how each one is a self-contained story. You could technically read them in any order. One of the things that put me off fantasy books a long time ago is how they tend to have to go for many volumes more than they need to; although the far kingdoms series is 4 books long it doesn't give the impression of being dragged out.
Kingdoms of the Night isn't so much different to the original book in the series, but although the story isn't particularly new, the charm of it, I think, is the adventure. Every chapter has some new danger; some creature or demon trying to pluck sailors to a watery death. A new location full of mystery and lurking threats. It's a classic boy's adventure. I really got caught up in that, and I think that's where the story's simple charm lay. It's good escapism, and although (outside of A song of Ice & fire) I've long ago been put-off fantasy, I enjoyed this enough to have already bought book 4 which is queued up to read.
There were a few things I'd nit-pick though; None of the bad-guys seem to be particularly threatening- except the demon king who really only appears late in the story. I think more could've been made of Amalric's son. Many of the lesser characters seemed that they weren't that well fleshed-out and were perhaps generic archetypes. That said, it fits in with the 'boys own adventure' type tale. A few phrases also bothered me; early in the book they are sneaking up a graveled 'drive' to a mansion. A driveway to me is a modern thing, if it said path I wouldn't have flinched. Also Amalric's journal often read 'Janela and me' as opposed to 'Janela and I' but that can be passed off as the character's voice rather than author's style. And lastly arrows were often 'fired' but of course arrows are 'shot' or 'loosed' rather than fired being as there is no fire involved.
A great, fun book. It's not too deep or particularly thought-provoking, but it's a great adventure well told.
April 23, 2022
Gosh, somehow I thought it was only a year since I read
The Warrior’s Tale
, but it has actually been two?? How time flies in this pandemic.
I was in a minor reading slump the week following Untamed , so when I went back to reading I wanted something I knew I could get through, something unchallenging. Kingdoms of the Night fits these criteria. As I have remarked in my previous reviews of this series, these are not exactly your most original or thought-provoking fantasy novels. In his introductions, Allan Cole makes it clear that he and Chris Bunch set out to replicate their science-fiction success in the fantasy genre in a practical, nearly formulaic way. It’s very similar to how David Eddings has approached writing fantasy, starting with his Belgariad series—and since the Belgariad was my gateway into fantasy, I suppose I have a soft spot for these kinds of books. Indeed, my vague memory of The Warrior’s Return, the next and final book of this quartet, is what motivated me to go back and re-read these.
In this installment, Amalric Antero returns as the narrator. He’s an old guy and definitely no longer interested in sex unless you magically rejuvenate him and dangle the sexy granddaughter of his one-time protégé, Janos Greycloak, in front of him … and what are the odds … what’s that? That’s exactly what happens? Oh. OK then.
Amalric and the new Greycloak set off on an adventure to find the real Far Kingdoms, because the one that he and the old Greycloak found in the first novel were but a poor reflection, much like what C.S. Lewis pulled with Narnia. What ensues is very much your typical hero’s journey adventure narrative, complete with a series of obstacles to overcome, a literal demonic villain, and heroism aplenty for all our major and minor characters alike.
I want to say this is better than either of the first two books, that Cole and Bunch have improved, but honestly … it’s more of the same. If anything, The Far Kingdoms had more heft to it because Amalric faced more internal conflict and character development. In this book, as a fully formed adventurer, he is much more confident in himself—but he doesn’t really have to struggle with his inner demons, just the outer ones, and they aren’t as scary. As much as Cole and Bunch try to add depth to their world through spiritual aspects of the study of magic, the characters don’t live up to these aspirations. Most of them are flat, one dimensional, and even the main characters like Amalric are two dimensional at best.
Now, there are some redeeming qualities. Once again, this book features at least a whiff of queerness (though, sadly, the explicitly gay character is killed off page before we even meet him). I say this only to remark on it as a book from the late 1990s including such views.
Also, while the plot is formulaic and predictable, I would hardly call it plodding or pedestrian. I like to think of books like this as B-movies. I’m not going to heap praise on it, but if it’s on TV one afternoon I would watch it (or stream it if I’m in the mood for something mindless). That’s what Kingdoms of the Night provides, exactly what I was looking for: a simple fantasy story with a happy ending that I didn’t have to think too much about.
I’m not mad about it.
Originally posted on Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my newsletter.
I was in a minor reading slump the week following Untamed , so when I went back to reading I wanted something I knew I could get through, something unchallenging. Kingdoms of the Night fits these criteria. As I have remarked in my previous reviews of this series, these are not exactly your most original or thought-provoking fantasy novels. In his introductions, Allan Cole makes it clear that he and Chris Bunch set out to replicate their science-fiction success in the fantasy genre in a practical, nearly formulaic way. It’s very similar to how David Eddings has approached writing fantasy, starting with his Belgariad series—and since the Belgariad was my gateway into fantasy, I suppose I have a soft spot for these kinds of books. Indeed, my vague memory of The Warrior’s Return, the next and final book of this quartet, is what motivated me to go back and re-read these.
In this installment, Amalric Antero returns as the narrator. He’s an old guy and definitely no longer interested in sex unless you magically rejuvenate him and dangle the sexy granddaughter of his one-time protégé, Janos Greycloak, in front of him … and what are the odds … what’s that? That’s exactly what happens? Oh. OK then.
Amalric and the new Greycloak set off on an adventure to find the real Far Kingdoms, because the one that he and the old Greycloak found in the first novel were but a poor reflection, much like what C.S. Lewis pulled with Narnia. What ensues is very much your typical hero’s journey adventure narrative, complete with a series of obstacles to overcome, a literal demonic villain, and heroism aplenty for all our major and minor characters alike.
I want to say this is better than either of the first two books, that Cole and Bunch have improved, but honestly … it’s more of the same. If anything, The Far Kingdoms had more heft to it because Amalric faced more internal conflict and character development. In this book, as a fully formed adventurer, he is much more confident in himself—but he doesn’t really have to struggle with his inner demons, just the outer ones, and they aren’t as scary. As much as Cole and Bunch try to add depth to their world through spiritual aspects of the study of magic, the characters don’t live up to these aspirations. Most of them are flat, one dimensional, and even the main characters like Amalric are two dimensional at best.
Now, there are some redeeming qualities. Once again, this book features at least a whiff of queerness (though, sadly, the explicitly gay character is killed off page before we even meet him). I say this only to remark on it as a book from the late 1990s including such views.
Also, while the plot is formulaic and predictable, I would hardly call it plodding or pedestrian. I like to think of books like this as B-movies. I’m not going to heap praise on it, but if it’s on TV one afternoon I would watch it (or stream it if I’m in the mood for something mindless). That’s what Kingdoms of the Night provides, exactly what I was looking for: a simple fantasy story with a happy ending that I didn’t have to think too much about.
I’m not mad about it.
Originally posted on Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my newsletter.
November 7, 2011
Well, I am not impressed. The book is not bad, but it is kind of borring. It's predictably adventurous. There is the great evil, which of course is overcome in the end, there is the good hero, the love story. Personally I enjoyed the first book the most, but frankly, I read it long ago, and don't remember it much. The writing style is bearable, at least there is some humour.
July 18, 2013
"Там, където отиваме с Джанела, корабите не потъват. Вятърът духа само на изток. Всички брегове са легендарни. И душата на всеки мореплавател лети към хоризонта.
Там мечтите чакат да ги прегърнем...
Там, в Далечното царство."
Край на трилогията на Алън Кол и Крис Бънч.
Беше едно великолепно пътешествие!
Там мечтите чакат да ги прегърнем...
Там, в Далечното царство."
Край на трилогията на Алън Кол и Крис Бънч.
Беше едно великолепно пътешествие!
January 17, 2013
Very good. Just a little bit too similar to the first book for my taste. But if you liked the first one, you'll want to read this one.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews