In tapping onetime reporter and Louisiana native, Leo Honeycutt, to write his “authorized” biography, Edwin Edwards doomed an otherwise intriguing story to a near laughable (if not at times painful) book. Given the rate at which this book was selling before it was even printed, I caution most readers to STOP. It is probably not worth reading. For those of you who are devoted fans of Louisiana political history you probably have to read this book, but only because others are doing so – it is, unfortunately, likely to be discussed over coffee or lunch tables. The writing (and, even worse, the editing) is not quite bad enough to ruin it entirely, but it comes close. For all others more casually interested in this book, skip it.
Honeycutt’s writing is like that of…well, someone trying too hard. His language is oftentimes overly flowery. For example, he has a bad habit of referring to legislators as ‘solons’. True enough, the term is a synonym for legislator; indeed, it even connotes particularly civic-minded thoughtful legislators. Occasionally using the term in an ironic way - perhaps when the Louisiana Legislature did something particularly silly - would be quite clever. But, Honeycutt uses it just about every time he has to refer to legislators. It sounds as if he either is attempting to sound smart by using such an unusual word or that he thinks writing consists of looking up words in a thesaurus and replacing them with the most unusual he can find.
Worse than the writing is the editing. In his introduction, Honeycutt mentions that his original draft was three times longer than the published book. But the cutting comes across as haphazard. In a couple of paragraphs, the book jumps from one topic to a different one entirely and then back again. Even worse, this frequently happens within the same paragraph…without any transition, or hint to the reader that subjects are changing (much less why). Indeed, at a few points, the new material is introduced with pronouns referring to as yet unnamed persons. And, of course, no editing nightmare is complete without grammatical mistakes left in the text; yep, this one has them.
In terms of substance, the book focuses too much on events after the fourth term. Almost half the book is devoted to the investigation, trial, and verdict. Everything before that feels rushed – as if Honeycutt cannot wait to get to the scandal. As you read about this part of Edwards’ life, you soon realize why. Honeycutt is very much an Edwards partisan. There’s nothing wrong with that of course; but, given Honeycutt’s unabashed and frequent swipes at Edwards’ political and legal enemies you start to wonder about his credibility. On the other hand, what he does reveal about the investigation and trial can be disconcerting and leave you wondering how Edwards could have been convicted. Since Edwards is a controversial figure, it would have been nice to feel like you were offered a handle on the complete story. In the end you just don’t know because this book is clearly intended to be a defense of Edwards…it is his ‘authorized’ biography after all.