I read this book as an introduction to the history and evolution of oriental dance over the years. Some parts were genuinely interesting, especially the sections about the Ghawazee and Kuchuk Hanem.
That said, I have quite a few criticisms:
- A lot of “historical” information is thrown around without footnotes or sources, which made me question how accurate some of it really is.
- The author seems very attached to the idea that oriental dance started as a “goddess” dance created by women for women. She often presents this as fact, without really backing it up. As a feminist, I would love for that to be true, but at the end of the day, it’s a theory, not a proven fact, and it should be treated as such.
- What bothered me most, though, was the constant Western gaze. You can tell right away that the book wasn’t written by someone from North Africa or the Middle East. I get that a lot of the history of oriental dance wasn’t properly documented locally, and that Orientalist accounts are sometimes all we have. Still, I don’t understand why legends like Badia Masabni, Samia Gamal, Naima Akef, and Tahia Carioca weren’t given more space. The same goes for Egyptian movies from the Golden Era in general, which, in my opinion, deserved a LONG chapter.
Instead, the book spends far more time talking about Ruth St. Denis (and concludes with the American Tribal Style) than about the Egyptian dancers who truly shaped and transformed this art form. These women are still seen as icons by dancers around the world today, and it feels wrong that they weren’t given the recognition they deserve.
The author does acknowledge how important the tradition of women dancing together in private spaces is (supporting and hyping each other up with zaghareet) in the MENA region. Yet, she almost erases the local women who took that tradition and turned it into a real, professional, global art form.
It leaves me wondering: does she really appreciate oriental dance for what it is, an art form intrinsically tied to a specific culture and that cannot be separated from it, or mainly for what it brings to her personally?