This is a compelling read for boxing fans, and I would recommend it to those who were fans and recall the period of the 1990s but particularly to younger fans who might have only been kids or not even born then, to help them understand the history of the sport and better assess the legacies of that era at work in the current historical moment. Even non-fans will appreciate the personal struggles, calamities, and successes it documents, for McRae has a gift for getting at the human behind the hype. As Joyce Carol Oates noted in a back cover blurb of the revised second edition I used, “A vividly rendered, immensely readable book.”
As it runs to just over 600 pages, I would recommend reading it over a period of time, dipping into some each day, rather than trying to read it straight through without reading other books while doing so. I found the Intro a lovely piece that could stand alone as a piece of excellent prose, a reminiscence of the author’s boyhood in South Africa and how and why boxing came to have such a power in his life that raises significant questions about the interstices of class, race, and masculinity as defined and demonstrated through the professional ongoing of this blood sport even while speaking to its mesmerizing grace, beauty, and psychological power. McRae went on to live in London, so the bulk of the book traces his following of great boxing legends in the U.K. and the U.S. in the 1990s, including both his intimate interviews outside the ring and his dazzling accounts of the battles within. Among the players he’ll help you come to know well and understand more deeply, count Chris Eubank, James Toney, Naseem Hamed, Oscar de la Hoya, Roy Jones, Evander Holyfield, Don King, Bob Arum, and the enigma that serves as bookends for the beginning and end of the tome (including the postscript to the 2014 edition): Mike Tyson.
Many writers who integrate their own life and experiences into such a study, in the tradition of New Journalism, I often find too self-absorbed and thus off putting in 21st century literature. I want to be emphatic that this is certainly not the case here, and McRae’s blending of his own life and marriage into the narrative works because of his honesty and forthrightness. He is genuine, and this leads me to add great weight to his take on this wide range of different colorful personalities that made up the boxing world then and now. One small quibble: I was a bit distracted by what I felt were too many typos turning up in a revised second edition. Nevertheless, big thumbs up for this classic book on boxing, a must read for those studying the history of the sport.