For those contemplating religious choices, Unitarian Universalism offers an appealing alternative to religious denominations that stress theological creeds over individual conviction and belief. In this new edition of the classic introductory text on Unitarian Universalism, which includes a revealing, entertaining foreword by best-selling author Robert Fulghum (All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, It Was on Fire When I Lay Down on It), a new preface by UU moderator Denise Davidoff, and two new chapters by the authors, John Buehrens and Forrest Church explore the many sources of the living tradition of their chosen faith.
I’ve enjoyed attending a Unitarian Universalist church about every other Sunday for a while, and thought I should know a little more about it, so I picked up this book.
That’s a lie. I have no idea where the book came from, whether it was a gift or a request for review or a purchase I forgot I had made. It just appeared on my bookshelf, without getting logged in my review queue. I love mysteries, so I read it.
U.U. is a merger of two denominations—Universalists and Unitarians—and to be honest, I didn’t learn a lot from the book. That’s because there is no creed to learn, no rituals to perform, no insistence upon a single belief system, while at the same time it demeans none of them. It’s pluralism to the extreme. Fits me to a T, right?
U.U. is a sort of common-sense, practical religion. It feels, to me, open and honest. There is no denial of sin, death, evil, and suffering, but rather there is a humanitarian call to ease or overcome them. Those U.U.’s who have a Christian bent tend to lean toward “works” in the great faith-vs-works debate. I’ve never been good at denying scientific findings (like evolution), and have a tough time believing in any particular afterlife scenario over another, so U.U. fits me there, too. This quote I found absolutely fascinating:
Death is a fairly recent entry in the scheme of evolution. The beginnings of life on this planet were sponsored by single cell organisms, which replicated themselves by division. One generation of beings followed another, each identical to the last. We were immortal, until we became interesting.
But how do I explain the book? I thought I’d just list a few more quotes, and maybe something will resonate with you as well.
Unitarian Universalism might best be described as a life-affirming rather than death-defying faith.
“The Universalists believe that God is too good to damn them, whereas the Unitarians believe they are too good to be damned!” –Star King, p. 34
The light of God (“God” is not God’s name, but our name for that which is greater than all and yet present in each) not only shines down upon us, but also out from within us.
One Truth, many truths; one God, many faiths; one light (Unitarianism), may windows (Universalism).
I had high hopes for this book. I've been tentatively going to a UU church in my neighbourhood for a few months now, and I wanted to do some background research. However, both of the authors of this book wrote from a theistic perspective, so I'm still in the dark as to how atheists (like me) fit into the UU picture.
This is a wonderful little book both as an Introduction/Overview to Unitarian Universalism and as a general work on non-creedal religion. Unitarians do not proselytize or evangelize and do not have any formal doctrine beyond seven basic principles (below). As a result, it can be a bit difficult to tease out the core of the faith. This book is a good, basic summation of the religion and its theology by a former UUA president (Buehrens) and one of its most prominent theologians, the recently deceased Forrest Church. It is a good read for anyone interested in moving beyond dogma to practical religion or just getting a taste of a different approach to devotion. Highly recommended.
The Seven Principles of Unitarian Universalism
1) The inherent worth and dignity of every person
2) Justice, equity and compassion in human relations
3) Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations
4) A free and responsible search for truth and meaning
5) The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large
6) The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all
7)Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part
I started attending a UU church back in November after the election and wanted to learn more about the history and tenets of the church. This book does a great job of outlining both in a way that also held my attention.
I particularly liked this quote, "Faith is not ultimately about believing some proposition in spite of the evidence; it is more like living with courage, gratitude, and integrity despite life's inevitable losses. And hope is not a matter of knowing that everything will turn out all right, either for oneself, or even for all of us on Earth together. It is more like directing your life toward a point on the horizon beyond which none of us can see, but toward which we all have to journey if there is to be a worthwhile future for any one of us."
I've attended a handful of UU services in a couple of different congregations over the years, and I sometimes think back on one of the experiences I recall: the congregation was asked to one by one come to the front of the church and place a rock into a bowl of water as some kind of reflective exercise. I can see and appreciate the idea here, but I felt so incredibly silly doing it that it invariably brings a smirk to my face.
That half-smirking, half-profound feeling is what I had for the bulk of this book. The authors, like most of the UUs I have met, have a way of taking things Very Seriously. Many of them fit the old "spiritual but not religious" cliche. The old tenets of Christianity no longer feel relevant, so UU maintains the form but swaps out the doctrine for a DIY spiritual collage. It obviously works quite well for some people, and when I'm in the right frame of mind, I can certainly get into the vibe. But at other times, I have to wonder why someone would really want to go through these motions.
This book includes several chapters on the history of both the Unitarian and Universalist denominations, and how they eventually came to be joined. It includes chapters on the theology, or lack thereof, of the church. It serves its purpose of introducing the reader to the UU faith and doctrine admirably well. But is it persuasive? I would argue not, unless the reader already wishes to be persuaded. Then again, UUs aren't much for proselytizing, so perhaps that is really keeping in the spirit of the enterprise.
If you're really curious about what a UU community or congregation is like, probably best to just start by visiting some Sunday morning. You'll likely find a group of well-meaning, earnest people with idealism and respect for learning. It may be that you'll fit right in, or it may be that you'll feel that it's a bit overcooked, and choose to sleep in the next Sunday.
My family has started attending the local Unitarian Universalist church in the last couple months and I’ve found it quite invigorating and interesting. As part of the process, we took the “Introduction to UU” class and I bought a book about the religion. Having finished it now, I’m happy to report that I’m even more interested in this community than I was previously.
A couple general thoughts:
* UU started as a Christian sect that held views believed by other sects to be apostasy. Its commitment to reason and science and human values intrigued me, and its renunciation of dogma was the clincher. The value of being able to belong to a faith community that doesn’t demand allegiance to a specific view of the afterlife is intriguing. * I like the idea of showing concern for this life. The one, as the authors of this book put it, that we know for sure we have. * The introduction starts with these two sentences: “All Theology is autobiography. As are most sweeping generalizations, this one is false.” It struck me that the second sentence there was a fractal spiral of meaning, a kind of mobius strip that could stand on its own, like “Cici n’est pas une pipe.”
Below the fold are a few passages I marked that I find particularly enlightening or interesting.
Regarding Unitarian minister Ellery Channing’s experience after going to a revival with his father:
By bedtime, young Channing had an insight that led to questions. His father did not really believe the revivalist at all! Neither did most people. Did people really become better because of fear? He thought not. Was God really so harsh and cruel? Then why praise God in worship? Why did people say they believed one thing when their actions showed they believed something else? Is doctrine the most important thing in religion? or is it the way people live? (27)
Regarding the challenge of humanism:
Too much mercy can squeeze out justice; and too much attention to our better nature can blind us to the awesome human capacity for evil. (43)
Regarding the difference between morality and moralism:
Moral posturing gives us a sense of accomplishment without our having actually done anything. In short, we feel that we have washed our hands every time we wring them. It’s like a mock purification ceremony which gives only the appearance of cleansing. (49)
Regarding prophecy (”liberal” here refers not to political ideology but lack of dogma):
The prophetic liberal church is the church in which all members share the common responsibility to attempt to forsee the consequences of human behavior, both individual and institutional, with the intention of making history instead of merely being pushed around by it. (67)
Regarding reason
No matter how much we value the use of reason, no matter how lofty our spiritual ideals, our common concern is to bring those ideals down to earth and into practice in our daily human lives. Morally, we recognize that our lives are mortared together by our common mortality. (181)
Regarding flexibility of belief
Knowing that we need not think alike to love alike, we acknowledge the integrity of spiritual insights that differ from our own, so long as our neighbor returns the favor. (193)
First, it was dry, dry, dry. Second, it was more of a history of Unitarian Universalism than an understanding of the religion. It's made clear on the outset that the UU religion is one of acceptance and liberal free thinking. I can appreciate that. Bring your personal faith and spirituality, or lack of it, and use it to help the greater good of the church.
What I felt was missing though, was: "What exactly to Unitarian Universalists believe?" Consider you and your spouse as UU adherents. After having children, you wish to raise them in the faith. So, what do you teach them? I don't feel like I got any sort of clear answer.
I can tell you though that I very much did not appreciate the tone of John A. Buehrens as one of the authors. It's clear he's a theist, and doesn't seem to have much tolerance for atheists, pagans, or agnostics. This is ironic, because the core tenet of the faith, is that of acceptance, regardless of affiliation. Buddhists, Christians, Muslims, atheists, pagans, Jains, and so many more are welcome to bring their holy books and their beliefs with them to the UU church. So why does the tone Buehrens puts forth so unaccepting?
Forrest Church however, had a much more accepting, understanding, empathetic tone to his additions to the book.
There was one part of the book that I did enjoy though, and it was this, that each of the great religions has a distinctive note, to be likened to the strings of a harp.
* In Hinduism it is the note of spirit: a universe throbbing with divine energy and meaning. * In Buddhism it is the wisdom of self-discipline: quenching the fire of desire in the cool waters of meditation. * In Confucianism it is reciprocity: mutual consideration is the basis of society. * In Taoism it is to conquer by inaction: be lowly and serviceable, like a brook; become rich by sharing. * In Judaism it is exodus from bondage: the covenant of responsibility in freedom. * In Islam it is the note of submission: "Our God and your God is one, to whom we are self-surrendered." * In Christianity it is that all may become one: "This is my body broken for you." "Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these."
When all is said and done though, I felt like I didn't really learn anything about what Unitarian Universalists believe, other than that they accept others for who they are. 256 pages, and I still need to go to the Internet and figure it out. Le sigh.
This is a great introduction to Unitarian Universalism. It’s very informative, well-researched, and well-thought. At times it seemed to drag a little for me because the material is pretty heavy philosophically and informationally, but I’m glad I pushed through. It was definitely worth it. I would recommend this book to anyone interested in religion and the nature of spirituality in general, as there are a lot of great thoughts along those lines.
I checked this out from the library but I feel like I should buy it because I just found myself wanting to mark so many passages. I love this book and this organization because they give words to the thoughts and feelings I have had for awhile. Interestingly, that is a common sentiment among UU’s, hence the title of the book, “A Chosen Faith”. Rather than a faith choosing me, I am finally choosing my own.
"A Chosen Faith" has really helped me look at my own life’s losses in a different light, one in which I can more easily accept them. It has brought me a kind of peace that I have not been able to find until now.
I didn't particularly care for this book; mainly because it wasn't what I expected. I expected more of a modern take on Unitarian Universalism but it seemed like I received more of a history of how Unitarians and Universalists came together to form UU. There was definitely some contemporary stuff in there, but the book was so dry that I had begun skipping whole sections and I can't really speak to the meat of the book. Not a book I would recommend to beginners wanting to learn about UU.
Well-written book gives a good picture of Unitarian Universalism today, with its inclusiveness and breadth of thought, though being written by two ministers the church aspect is emphasized.
A helpful survey of Unitarian Universalism, recommended by my minister. This book was originally written in the 1980's and thus misses some of the more recent history of the church, namely the ongoing reckoning with racial injustice within the church itself. And at times the book is a bit heavy on the history lessons (a familiar phenomenon from Sunday sermons as well). But with those caveats I really did love this book and will return to it again in the future.
I love that the foreword is a recreation of the awkward conversation that I myself have had multiple times - "So, you go to church? But you don't believe in God? How does that work?" Well, in the UU church you don't need to profess a specific creed in order to belong. Instead, universal belonging is the starting point. It's right there in the name! So the real question is, given that we're all here together, what should we do? How should we live? And I don't think you can figure it out by yourself. This book really helped me fall in love with the church again in a time when our specific congregation is going through a pretty challenging time.
One example of a passage I marked: "Faith is not ultimately about believing some proposition in spite of the evidence; it is more like living with courage, gratitude, and integrity in spite of life's inevitable losses. And hope is not a matter of knowing that everything will turn out all right, either for oneself, or even for all of us on Earth together. It is more like directing your life toward a point on the horizon beyond which none of us can see, but toward which we all have to journey if there is to be a worthwhile future for any one of us."
I must admit I was frustrated by this book as it was partially an apologia for the liberal and inclusive practices of modern Unitarian Universalists--with the dominant form of liberal beliefs reflecting that of the late 1990s when it was compiled--and a history of the development of U.U. beliefs. However, it wasn't completely either and seemed to move between explaining current practices in the U.U. faith, to the U.U.'s development historically, to waxing poetic about the shared nature of spiritual development and the compatibility with humanism, earth-based religions, and non-Christian movements. Ultimately no article satisfied me but elements of each were interesting.
An excellent excuse to broaden your mind, whether you are a Unitarian Universalist or not. As any good UU text should do, it challenges whatever beliefs you had coming into it - not in a threatening way, but in an encouraging, expansive way.
Summarizing the beliefs of Unitarian Universalism, a non-creedal pluralist religion, is a fiendishly difficult exercise. As of yet, I have not encountered an overview I've found satisfying, and this book is no exception. It's acceptable, serviceable even, but really shouldn't be treated as seminal as UU churches often treat it. I imagine a former UUA president being one of the authors is a likely cause for that. This book is as diverse as particle board, as white as a picket fence, and as engaging as a highschool textbook. It's not without its merits, but for those looking for a door into UUism, this isn't it. It's good vibes only here.
I would probably prefer to give this book 3.5 stars. This book is written by two main authors - John Buerhens and Forrest Church. I strongly preferred the opinions of Church to Buerhens. Buerhens is avowedly a Christian, and very anti-atheist. As someone who is decidedly non-theist, that stance doesn't sit well with me. Understanding that UU isn't a faith of creed, it is easy enough for me to read and consider what he has to say without considering it to represent all of UU. Still, that half of book became grating. I much preferred Church's opinions and veiwpoints, which were more theoretical and abstract.
Also, the chapters on prophets were off-putting as an ex-Mormon. I realize that UUs don't view the shared "prophecy and priesthood" the way that a Mormon would, but I have never liked heroes. So, those chapters were annoying.
Still, a good book and a good introduction to a highly diverse religion. I learned some things I had not known and my conception of theology was enlarged.
Not for everyone, it being a mostly spiritual text, but a very good introduction to the seven foundational principles, and history, of UUism (for short). It reminds me why I call myself a Unitarian Universalist, because I don't often have the opportunity to attend services. I would recommend it for anyone interested in broadening their knowledge about spiritual belief systems, and especially for any UU that wants to know more about the basic guidelines of UUism. The authors, both ministers and involved in the administration of the US Unitarian church, are very well-written, and use anecdotes and history to illustrate the meanings of the principles.
This seems more like a book for those who are already involved in the UU church and want to learn more about its history. I wouldn’t expect my religious friends to read this and understand. I think they’d already have to have their toes in the water. Great history and info for current or newer UU members.
An essential book for anyone who has interest inthe current, living Unitarian Univeralist Association. There is some history as you would hope for but much of the information has to do with the here-and-now.
Unitarian Universalists, and those curious about the faith, wishing to understand the religion''s sources, will find A Chosen Faith by Forrest Church and John Buehrens useful. I found it a thought-provoking and enjoyable read.
Great book for a new Unitarian Universalist. Through dueling stories between John Buehrens and Forrest Church, this gives a good sample of the spiritual perspectives that make up this faith.
I had the enjoyable opportunity to read through this book with friends and discuss two chapters each week. (The pandemic hit in the middle of this, and I was pleased that we kept going!) As so often happens, I found I got more out of the content after hashing it over in a live discussion. I've been attending a UU church for a while, and I was interested in learning more about what actually is the core of this rambling, expansive, open-hearted religion. The book alternates chapters between two authors, so you also get slightly different views on the same topics.
My absolute favorite part was chapter 5, which introduces the metaphor of a cathedral to illustrate how we each see a different bit of truth and meaning (through the cathedral's colorful windows), but none of us do (can?) go outside to face the full shining light of truth unfiltered. I also appreciated several Emerson quotes, including the assertion that religious education is "not to stamp our minds upon the young, but to stir up their own" (ideal for all education, actually! but can be hard to remember when you're the one instructing). Chapter 3 is also strong in advocating "deeds not creeds" and warning us to avoid "the sin of sophisticated resignation" (thinking that since your opinions are on the right side of justice, you are done, having just thought a laudable thought, and not actually done anything with it).
Other parts didn't work as well for me. I was particularly disappointed in Chapters 9-10 which were supposed to touch on "humanist" teachings that inform UU beliefs (in contrast to Chapters 7-8 which discussed the religion's Jewish/Christian influences). UUs claim that they get inspiration from all kinds of sources - religious texts but also poetry, nature, and even science (!). So I thought there'd be more secular content in these "humanist" teachings, but Chapter 9 spends most of its time finger-shaking at those who would emphasize freedom TOO much or tolerance TOO much or reason TOO much. An important warning, but why didn't this admonishment appear in the discussion of Jewish/Christian teachings in Chapters 7-8 as well? Everything has a downside if taken to extremes. Chapter 10 is sprinkled with Biblical quotations, not humanist at all. The beginning of Chapter 10 has an absolutely fascinating quote from Freeman Dyson about the possibility of a "Socinian god" which led me into some very interesting Wikipedia territory. That alone could have been GREAT fodder for this chapter, but the author never discussed the quote, just moved on. Chapter 10 mentions the names of some scientists, but not a single scientific *idea* that bears on the pursuit of how to live your life well (the point of religion). I think a lot more could have been done here.
But overall, I enjoyed gaining familiarity with some UU ideas (or at least two people's UU ideas). Discussing it with friends really enriched the book as well!
I found the UU faith while on internship in Muncie, Indiana. In this cold and racist place, the UU church was a beacon of hope. I'll never forget the fist service I attended was about the illusion of separateness and the many programs happening that week in the community. Events like LGBT youth prom and literacy programs for those living without a home. I had found a living faith of social justice oriented people. Ever since, I've been attending service and figuring out what this faith tradition is all about. This book illuminated the history and the heart of the faith.
I deeply enjoyed this book. So many of the UU pillars resonate with me and it feels like I have finally found a spiritual home. I walk away with the following noteworthy understandings of Unitarian Universalism: - We believe in the worth and dignity of each human being. All people on earth have an equal claim to life, and justice. -Resect for the interdependent web of all essences of which we are a part. (protection of nature, desired to live in balance with it) -We have no explicit creed and engage in a practical faith of deeds. -We believe in the unity of experience. There is no fundamental conflict between faith and knowledge; religion and the world; the sacred and the secular.
Favorite Quotes: pg. 16 Awaking is not a moment, but an ongoing process. pg 38. Religion is a way to wonder pg 43 We seek a honest religion. One that afflicts the comfortable and comforts the afflicted. Too much mercy can squees out justice; and too much attention to our better nature can blind us to the awesome human capacity for evil. pg 84 God is that which is greater than all and yet present in each. pg 104 In each of the world's great faith's there is something authentic to appreciate and hear. pg 151 The work of the church is to transform society. pg 159 Science and technology without awe and humility about how they are used too easily become threat to both nature and humanity. pg 191. Having dismissed the supernatural, we may miss discovering the super in the natural. <3 Last page 212. Revelation is not sealed. It is lived anew in every heart.
UU Values: Curiosity, wonder, equity, questioning, dialogue, listening, serving, learning, growing, justice, humility, action, protection, communication, adaptation, self-reflection, critical inquiry, awe, balance, introducing children to all faiths so that they may make up their own minds and see the interconnections.
This was an entertaining read. As others have mentioned, it is pretty esoteric in nature. Don't expect a bunch of direct answers out of this book as their is no set creed to follow. The religion is based on life's shared morals regardless of country, religion, race, culture, etc.
Have respect for others, preferably as you would respect yourself. Be wary of placing greater importance on the tangible than the intangible. If you are not sure what to do, the path of least resistance is probably your best bet. etc.
I've visited a UU church a few times, it was an uplifting experience and the emphasis on community building was encouraging. There was a very noticeable lack of diversity in the congregation but that is not to say the congregants come from very different places and experiences which is its own form of diversity. Some people I met there take their spirituality very seriously, some just say it's a great way to enjoy a safe place to meet with others on Sunday as they are not comfortable with compromising their beliefs in order to be part of another organization.
I am currently taking an intro religious studies course at school, I was asked as one of the first questions "what is religion in your own words?" I would have to say after reading this book "religion is philosophy in action."
A Chosen Faith is an introduction to the principles underlying Unitarian Universalism, a liberal religion most popular in the United States but which still has only a comparatively small number of adherents. The book is structured as a series of essays exploring different themes that make up the foundations of Unitarian Universalist thought, from its history to its emphasis on individual choice to its respect of all religious traditions and the truths that they bring. As someone who is familiar with the general history of Unitarian Universalism but less clear on what the denomination looks like today, Buehrens' book was an interesting and informative read—the writing was extremely clear and the sometimes poetic way the prose was written made it a pleasure to read.
My guess is that those who have been involved in Unitarian Universalist churches have already been exposed to the vast majority of what's written, but for people like me who are actively exploring joining a Unitarian Universalist congregation, the book is a helpful primer into its core beliefs (and notably its lack of dogma) that speaks to many of the reasons why outsiders turn to UU.
Liberal religion. Most people are strangers to it. A creedless faith that accepts humanism, science and pretty much every other religion in existence, including witches. Atheists are also welcome. Friendly to all races and forms of sexuality. Has a great deal of respect for nature. You form your own beliefs rather than being indoctrinated, what you believe is your responsibility. There are many famous Unitarian Universalists, among them- Clara Barton, Ralph Waldo Emerson and, to my surprise, Charles Hartshorne who is the foremost expert in Process metaphysics. The only Unitarian king was from Transylvania, and pre-WW2 the majority of UU's were from Czechoslovakia. Unitarianism denies the trinity and assets that God is one. Heavily influenced by the Jefferson Bible and New England Trascendentalism. Many interesting nuances in the interpretation of Christian terms and many interesting facts. This is a branch of Christianity that I can get behind!
Gives a look into the core principles and sources of the Universal Unitarian association. Not a single religion, but rather a gathering of people with the same core values which includes coming to a personal theology.
Introduction of this edition particularly insightful.
Some of the writing seemed haphazard and not cohesive, but for the most part I enjoyed and learned from the book.
My enjoyment came often in reading ideas that resonated with me. My learning came mostly in the form of learning the history of this movement, from its start as two religions which started as denominations of Christianity that emphasized the teachings of Jesus Christ rather than emphasizing the person. I am more interested in the movement and values *now* rather than its history, but still interesting.