I really haven't known quite what to make of this book. It details the hounding, torturing, life-threatening behaviour of a husband enraged partly by his wife's infidelity with another woman (Patricia Cornwell, no less) and partly by the wife finally confessing to fraudulent practices by both of them against their employer - the FBI! It certainly does read as if Gene Bennett put his wife Margo through hell; in fact, he sounds like the archetypal badass narcissistic powermonger and did go to gaol. But my problem is: how come the author couldn't at least get an interview with Bennett? Unfortunately for the sake of balance, all we get is Margo's point of view, immeasurably weakening the book, in my view. In many ways, this is just a marriage-breakdown story - admittedly a scary one - so what you really need is the other side. Okay, maybe Gene was everything Margo painted him to be, but was Margo perfect? She went along with his frauds - took part in them - and cheated on him as well - before dumping him in it. Not to mention the damage to her children - although this is always the way of it with traumatic marriage breakdowns.
As for Patricia Cornwell, I can understand her reluctance to open up on it. For her it was just an episode, obviously of less importance for her than for Margo, who was an emotional mess at the time. But this is not to criticise Cornwell; things like this can just happen. Cornwell was only mentioned, really, because it added titillation to the tale.
All in all, an uneven, oversensationalised account. Given better treatment, this story could have amounted to something.